Booney wrote:So we're all in agreeance it should be 5 weeks?
Should be 5 but we've already seen the conditioning from the AFL that this is only going to be 3 so he can play the grand final.
He didn't self report Self reporting has to be on the same day initiated by the player There was contact made between the two clubson Sunday that forced them to report it The AFL are going to get absolutely roasted if anything less than 5 games
I'm fine with 4. Let the crows drop the qualifying final if they desperately want him to play the GF.
Precedent says he has to get 5+, but I'm a big believer that you can set a new precent if the old precent was wrong. Getting 5 games for using words is massive overs when you compare it to actions like Liam Baker thumping Peatling in the back of the head while he was face down on the ground and defenceless, yet Liam is being cleared to play the next week.
Danny Southern telling Plugga he's fat, I'd like to see that!
Booney wrote:So we're all in agreeance it should be 5 weeks?
Should be 5 but we've already seen the conditioning from the AFL that this is only going to be 3 so he can play the grand final.
He didn't self report Self reporting has to be on the same day initiated by the player There was contact made between the two clubson Sunday that forced them to report it The AFL are going to get absolutely roasted if anything less than 5 games
So; yes they will give 3.
Jack Graham fessed up a week after saying it but your point remains it wasn't Rankine who came forward.
My issue with more than 3 is that it says that this is worse than the hit the Connor Nash did to Gyran Miers. I don’t think it is
It can’t be done this time but I’d like it to be a two week ban plus a $25,000 fine donated to a charity that helps the group of people they have vilified.
July 11th 2012....
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
2024 Melbourne Cup Punting Challenge winner knocking off the Pirate King!
Brodlach wrote:My issue with more than 3 is that it says that this is worse than the hit the Connor Nash did to Gyran Miers. I don’t think it is
It can’t be done this time but I’d like it to be a two week ban plus a $25,000 fine donated to a charity that helps the group of people they have vilified.
Money is no object to these blokes and fines mean nothing to them even if it was $25,000. Rankine is probably on $800-900k, a monthly pay would be $50k plus.
Brodlach wrote:My issue with more than 3 is that it says that this is worse than the hit the Connor Nash did to Gyran Miers. I don’t think it is
It can’t be done this time but I’d like it to be a two week ban plus a $25,000 fine donated to a charity that helps the group of people they have vilified.
Money is no object to these blokes and fines mean nothing to them even if it was $25,000. Rankine is probably on $800-900k, a monthly pay would be $50k plus.
The punishment doesn’t fit the crime here He needs to be penalised but missing finals is a massive penalty
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
Brodlach wrote:My issue with more than 3 is that it says that this is worse than the hit the Connor Nash did to Gyran Miers. I don’t think it is
It can’t be done this time but I’d like it to be a two week ban plus a $25,000 fine donated to a charity that helps the group of people they have vilified.
Money is no object to these blokes and fines mean nothing to them even if it was $25,000. Rankine is probably on $800-900k, a monthly pay would be $50k plus.
The punishment doesn’t fit the crime here He needs to be penalised but missing finals is a massive penalty
Brodlach wrote:My issue with more than 3 is that it says that this is worse than the hit the Connor Nash did to Gyran Miers. I don’t think it is
It can’t be done this time but I’d like it to be a two week ban plus a $25,000 fine donated to a charity that helps the group of people they have vilified.
Money is no object to these blokes and fines mean nothing to them even if it was $25,000. Rankine is probably on $800-900k, a monthly pay would be $50k plus.
The punishment doesn’t fit the crime here He needs to be penalised but missing finals is a massive penalty
It does. Sucked in, be better.
I won’t lose sleep over it but we can’t just go from nothing to heavy to even heavier penalties Surely some form of education(yes I know they get plenty already) is more appropriate than just suspending them
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
Trader wrote:Words are only offensive if you chose to take offence. Being punched in the back of the head while face down on the ground is always dangerous.
Trader wrote:Words are only offensive if you chose to take offence. Being punched in the back of the head while face down on the ground is always dangerous.
Trader wrote:Words are only offensive if you chose to take offence. Being punched in the back of the head while face down on the ground is always dangerous.
5 weeks vs free to play.
Oh, that's a slippery slope...
Are you offended?
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
Trader wrote:Words are only offensive if you chose to take offence. Being punched in the back of the head while face down on the ground is always dangerous.