Booney wrote:Darcy Tucker, for North v Port.
97 minutes on ground. 0 touches. 3 tackles. 9 AFL Fantasy points.
How do you not get a touch in 3 quarters of football?
I made a career out of it
by MW » Mon Apr 28, 2025 10:12 am
Booney wrote:Darcy Tucker, for North v Port.
97 minutes on ground. 0 touches. 3 tackles. 9 AFL Fantasy points.
How do you not get a touch in 3 quarters of football?
by Spargo » Mon Apr 28, 2025 12:56 pm
by bertiebeatle1 » Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:03 pm
Spargo wrote:North challenging the Paul Curtis farce.
by Jim05 » Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:16 pm
We have got you this week and even I don’t think he should’ve been suspended for thatSpargo wrote:North challenging the Paul Curtis farce.
by MW » Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:19 pm
by bertiebeatle1 » Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:48 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:57 pm
MW wrote:So you now cannot tackle from behind for fear of them falling forward with their arms pinned.
Slowly slowly removing all methods to tackle or bump.
by Booney » Mon Apr 28, 2025 2:04 pm
by whufc » Mon Apr 28, 2025 2:06 pm
Booney wrote:The Tribunal will say Curtis should have done something else.
The player / club will ask what he should have done.
The Tribunal will say he should have done something else.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Apr 28, 2025 2:19 pm
Booney wrote:The Tribunal will say Curtis should have done something else.
The player / club will ask what he should have done.
The Tribunal will say he should have done something else.
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Apr 28, 2025 3:01 pm
Jase wrote:Go the Baggers…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by Jase » Mon Apr 28, 2025 3:04 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Jase wrote:Go the Baggers…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Give me my dog back
Oh..... hang on.......... mine wouldn't be seen dead in that shite outfit
by Dutchy » Mon Apr 28, 2025 3:16 pm
by MW » Mon Apr 28, 2025 3:18 pm
by Armchair expert » Mon Apr 28, 2025 3:47 pm
MW wrote:So you now cannot tackle from behind for fear of them falling forward with their arms pinned. Slowly slowly removing all methods to tackle or bump.
Lightning McQueen wrote:You're a legend
by whufc » Mon Apr 28, 2025 3:51 pm
by wenchbarwer » Mon Apr 28, 2025 4:01 pm
Armchair expert wrote:MW wrote:So you now cannot tackle from behind for fear of them falling forward with their arms pinned. Slowly slowly removing all methods to tackle or bump.
Curtis should have copped a week for his tackle last week so this should have never happened.
Having said that , arms pinned, drove his head into the deck (accident or not it still happened) = gone
by Armchair expert » Mon Apr 28, 2025 4:09 pm
MW wrote:Crows challenging Hinges 1 week suspension. Waste of time.
Lightning McQueen wrote:You're a legend
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Apr 28, 2025 4:41 pm
Dutchy wrote:Well it was nice to see us competitive for 3 quarters on Saturday, can we deliver that more consistently will be the challenge, if we can then we will start winning games.
The over reaction about the umpires is so annoying as usual, the most critical one was missed with Willie illegally blocking Comben which resulted in the match sealing goal when we had momentum, but why focus on them? As I keep saying players make many many more mistakes which is well within the teams control. i.e. Larkey missing 3 sitters, Durrsma chosing to handball instead of kicking late in the game, SPP kicking into the man on the mark in the goal square, JHF elbowing Simpkin in the head giving away to 50m penalty/goal etc etc
The Curtis ban is predictable, as someone said, just come out and say it - if you concuss a player you will be getting a minimum of 3 weeks.
by Zelezny Chucks » Mon Apr 28, 2025 4:42 pm
wenchbarwer wrote:Armchair expert wrote:MW wrote:So you now cannot tackle from behind for fear of them falling forward with their arms pinned. Slowly slowly removing all methods to tackle or bump.
Curtis should have copped a week for his tackle last week so this should have never happened.
Having said that , arms pinned, drove his head into the deck (accident or not it still happened) = gone
I missed the incident over the weekend, just watched now.
It's an illegal tackle to start with, in that it was ruled in the back.
Pinning of the arms and the faceplant add to it, given what we've seen this year it's clearly reportable.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |