Booney wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Mark Yeates got away with attempted murder
Good bump.
It actually was.
He'd get games for intent today but didn't hit him in the head from memory.
by tigerpie » Tue Apr 16, 2024 2:48 pm
Booney wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Mark Yeates got away with attempted murder
Good bump.
by woodublieve12 » Tue Apr 16, 2024 2:58 pm
tigerpie wrote:Booney wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Mark Yeates got away with attempted murder
Good bump.
It actually was.
He'd get games for intent today but didn't hit him in the head from memory.
by whufc » Tue Apr 16, 2024 3:17 pm
MW wrote:sounds good in theory, but if we go back to the 90s when knocking people out legally was a thing, then after the law suits have finished we will not have a game left.
Need to protect the head, and if that means the game changes then so be it.
by Armchair expert » Tue Apr 16, 2024 8:01 pm
locky801 wrote:Cameron cops a week for the Lever tackle
by Booney » Wed Apr 17, 2024 7:30 am
Armchair expert wrote:locky801 wrote:Cameron cops a week for the Lever tackle
Downgraded to a fine at the tribunal
by Wedgie » Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:10 am
Booney wrote:Armchair expert wrote:locky801 wrote:Cameron cops a week for the Lever tackle
Downgraded to a fine at the tribunal
Well, he is a good bloke who does a bit in the communities.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by MW » Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:43 am
Booney wrote:Armchair expert wrote:locky801 wrote:Cameron cops a week for the Lever tackle
Downgraded to a fine at the tribunal
Well, he is a good bloke who does a bit in the communities.
by Bum Crack » Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:05 am
Booney wrote:Armchair expert wrote:locky801 wrote:Cameron cops a week for the Lever tackle
Downgraded to a fine at the tribunal
Well, he is a good bloke who does a bit in the communities.
by tigerpie » Wed Apr 17, 2024 2:13 pm
by mots02 » Wed Apr 17, 2024 3:41 pm
tigerpie wrote:The good bloke clause? WTF???
I didn't think it was a reportable offence anyway but just wow!
by wenchbarwer » Wed Apr 17, 2024 4:37 pm
mots02 wrote:tigerpie wrote:The good bloke clause? WTF???
I didn't think it was a reportable offence anyway but just wow!
Peter Wright must be an absolute shite bloke then!
by mots02 » Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:26 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:mots02 wrote:Spargo wrote:mots02 wrote:For How much longer does Clarkson avoid scrutiny? Not a lot of tangible improvement to be seen with North.
You are kidding? Hardest draw in the first 5 weeks for a team that finished equal bottom last year.
GWS, Carlton, Brisbane (all predicted as probable top 4), Geelong at Geelong & Freo who should really be 5-0
Imagine if we got WC, Rich (hello Port) to start the year, the Crows or Hawthorn…
It’s all about perspective, we know where we’re at, it’s going to take time.
Scrutiny after 17 games, turn it up.
Well you answered my question… so thanks.
Every draw is hard when you are at the bottom, you are often going to play teams that finished above you last year, I get that.
You have the crows and hawthorn in the next 2 weeks, so that should balance out the tough start a bit then.
I read a lot of comments today asking similar questions, about when the questions can be asked of the Clarkson period, so I asked that question on here.
17 games is too early. Noted.
I dare you to ask again next week.
by daysofourlives » Sun Apr 21, 2024 9:43 pm
by mots02 » Mon Apr 22, 2024 8:26 am
daysofourlives wrote:This will only end one way Mots02, North are tough to beat in Tassie, theyll be equal with the Crows after this week
by Spargo » Mon Apr 22, 2024 10:15 am
mots02 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:This will only end one way Mots02, North are tough to beat in Tassie, theyll be equal with the Crows after this week
No doubt, we are garbage at the moment and North should be feeling confident playing us in Hobart.
Beating the crows in Hobart still won’t make my original question last week any less relevant.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |