Coronavirus (Covid19)

[Jimmy_041]

There may have been a fair bit of red wine involved in those posts

[Armchair expert]

Clive Palmer rushed to hospital with covid-like symptoms

[Lightning McQueen]

#isolyfe

I haven't shaved all week.

I go shower and put on a shirt for my 10:15am daily zoom.

I get excited hearing the postie coming up the street and watch him drive past my letterbox.

I actually talk to people when they ring.

[Jimmy_041]

#isolyfe

I haven't shaved all week.

I go shower and put on a shirt for my 10:15am daily zoom.

I get excited hearing the postie coming up the street and watch him drive past my letterbox.

I actually talk to people when they ring.

Have you bought solar or blue pills yet?

[Lightning McQueen]

#isolyfe

I haven't shaved all week.

I go shower and put on a shirt for my 10:15am daily zoom.

I get excited hearing the postie coming up the street and watch him drive past my letterbox.

I actually talk to people when they ring.

Have you bought solar or blue pills yet?

No but I'm now with AGL, Simply Energy and Alinta, some nice bloke from Telstra also rang me to help me with my internet because it was apparently being hacked, I hadn't noticed but he's going to fix it for a small fee, how nice.

[stan]

Should interesting to get Daisy's views as he's back now from his UK trip.

[Jimmy_041]

Is the “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” over?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-04/ ... /100881214

10 days before the Court case - WAFP.

They should change their claim to a loss of wages if it wasn’t already in there

And down they go in NZ: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/462 ... orce-staff

[Jim05]

Is the “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” over?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-04/ ... /100881214

10 days before the Court case - WAFP.

They should change their claim to a loss of wages if it wasn’t already in there

And down they go in NZ: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/462 ... orce-staff

Caveat on that is that SAPOL personnel not fully vaccinated have to undertake mandatory RAT before every shift and must wear a mask at all times

[Jimmy_041]

Is the “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” over?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-04/ ... /100881214

10 days before the Court case - WAFP.

They should change their claim to a loss of wages if it wasn’t already in there

And down they go in NZ: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/462 ... orce-staff

Caveat on that is that SAPOL personnel not fully vaccinated have to undertake mandatory RAT before every shift and must wear a mask at all times

Could have done that from the start but coercion makes them feel more powerful
Oh hang on; back them RATs were deemed unreliable. Something changed (& it’s not the RATs)
The timing is exquisite with the Court case in the next fortnight
It may not go the same way - Australians don’t have the protection of a Bill of Rights like NZ

[MatteeG]

Day 5 of positive for me. First 2 1/2 days i felt shocking. Fever, Lethargic, cold sweats, headache.

Have improved enough today to ring work and tell em I'll log in tomorrow at this stage (home based).

2 juniors also positive, we've been isolated up in the external rumpus room. Son had a bit of a temp on his day 1. Daughter, not a single symptom.

As someone who is OK fitness wise, double vaxxed- those first 40-60 hours I can see how it would really knock around someone with more predominant co-morbidities.

[Jimmy_041]

Pfizer-clinical-trial-1.jpg (89.21 KiB) Viewed 2827 times

What Pfizer didn't want you to know for 75 years

https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/chd-s ... 00826.html

[am Bays]

Is the “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” over?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-04/ ... /100881214

10 days before the Court case - WAFP.

They should change their claim to a loss of wages if it wasn’t already in there

And down they go in NZ: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/462 ... orce-staff

Caveat on that is that SAPOL personnel not fully vaccinated have to undertake mandatory RAT before every shift and must wear a mask at all times

Could have done that from the start but coercion makes them feel more powerful
Oh hang on; back them RATs were deemed unreliable. Something changed (& it’s not the RATs)
The timing is exquisite with the Court case in the next fortnight
It may not go the same way - Australians don’t have the protection of a Bill of Rights like NZ

The data on RATS test reliability hasn't changed in the last 18 months, still 80%.

Basically 100% reliable if it says you're positive. The issue is 15-20 % of negatives RATS are actually positive, PCR tests less ~ 3% of negatives are actually positives

Meanwhile almost 20% of the NT population ahs had COVID (~ 46K cases) compared to ~ 10% in SA (~160K cases)

[Wedgie]

What Pfizer didn't want you to know for 75 years

https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/chd-s ... 00826.html

Not a great source. Credibility zero.

Children's Health Defense is an American 501 nonprofit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine activities and has been identified as one of the main sources of misinformation on vaccines.

[Booney]

What Pfizer didn't want you to know for 75 years

https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/chd-s ... 00826.html

Not a great source. Credibility zero.

Children's Health Defense is an American 501 nonprofit activist group mainly known for anti-vaccine activities and has been identified as one of the main sources of misinformation on vaccines.

[Lightning McQueen]

The data on RATS test reliability hasn't changed in the last 18 months, still 80%.

Basically 100% reliable if it says you're positive. The issue is 15-20 % of negatives RATS are actually positive, PCR tests less ~ 3% of negatives are actually positives

Meanwhile almost 20% of the NT population ahs had COVID (~ 46K cases) compared to ~ 10% in SA (~160K cases)

The information supplied is only 100% accurate 70% of the the time, only 50% of them occasions depend who made the RAT.

[amber_fluid]

The data on RATS test reliability hasn't changed in the last 18 months, still 80%.

Basically 100% reliable if it says you're positive. The issue is 15-20 % of negatives RATS are actually positive, PCR tests less ~ 3% of negatives are actually positives

Meanwhile almost 20% of the NT population ahs had COVID (~ 46K cases) compared to ~ 10% in SA (~160K cases)

The information supplied is only 100% accurate 70% of the the time, only 50% of them occasions depend who made the RAT.

And three fifths of **** all is still **** all!

[Lightning McQueen]

The data on RATS test reliability hasn't changed in the last 18 months, still 80%.

Basically 100% reliable if it says you're positive. The issue is 15-20 % of negatives RATS are actually positive, PCR tests less ~ 3% of negatives are actually positives

Meanwhile almost 20% of the NT population ahs had COVID (~ 46K cases) compared to ~ 10% in SA (~160K cases)

The information supplied is only 100% accurate 70% of the the time, only 50% of them occasions depend who made the RAT.

And three fifths of **** all is still **** all!

Only 60% of the time.

[stan]

Is the “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” over?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-03-04/ ... /100881214

10 days before the Court case - WAFP.

They should change their claim to a loss of wages if it wasn’t already in there

And down they go in NZ: https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/462 ... orce-staff

Mandates should be scraped now, if SAPOL have scraped then why bother on other work places.

[am Bays]

The data on RATS test reliability hasn't changed in the last 18 months, still 80%.

Basically 100% reliable if it says you're positive. The issue is 15-20 % of negatives RATS are actually positive, PCR tests less ~ 3% of negatives are actually positives

Meanwhile almost 20% of the NT population ahs had COVID (~ 46K cases) compared to ~ 10% in SA (~160K cases)

The information supplied is only 100% accurate 70% of the the time, only 50% of them occasions depend who made the RAT.

What's your standard error of estimate on those percentages?

[Lightning McQueen]

The information supplied is only 100% accurate 70% of the the time, only 50% of them occasions depend who made the RAT.

What's your standard error of estimate on those percentages?

43%