gazzamagoo wrote:Psyber wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:And just when I thought the world is f*****, a 3 month old baby has been found in it's mothers freezer............................and she has been released with no charge?
If she was psychotic she may be regarded as not responsible due to her mental disorder.
You have to be fairly seriously ill for that defence to work, but there are a lot of seriously psychotic people not in hospital or not being treated, as they need to be clearly "a danger to themselves or others" to be held in hospital against their will, or forced to take treatment they don't believe they need. That is not always easy to make stick even if you think it is true due to law changes that started back in the mid-1980s...
Helps to have a vagina.
Walsh's son is psychotic too & he's locked up.
True - the tricky bit is whether they are so Psychotic they don't register that what they are doing is "wrong" morally or in the eyes of the law.
Personally I think only a small minority of people with psychosis reach that point of
not knowing their action is wrong and I've given evidence in court a few times on that issue.
Some of the more severely ill are detained in hospital for assessment and determination of that issue. Sometimes a clever lawyer gets someone off on the basis of psychosis, and it turns out they were not that psychotic.
Another issue that gets some people off is having a rage reactions due to Temporal Lobe Epilepsy which can cause automated behaviour in a technically unconscious state. That is rare but perhaps more convincing that just having psychotic delusions.