by knowledge » Mon Nov 07, 2016 4:37 pm
by Wedgie » Mon Nov 07, 2016 8:45 pm
by JK » Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:26 am
knowledge wrote:Sturt didn't use it in 2016, doubt that West Adelaide did in 2015, either. Not sure about the Norwood 3 peat, but, I'd doubt that Nathan Bassett would be the type of coach who'd warm to the Leading Teams model.
by Booney » Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:54 am
by whufc » Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:34 pm
by DOC » Tue Nov 08, 2016 10:44 pm
by Wedgie » Wed Nov 09, 2016 7:44 am
by Booney » Wed Nov 09, 2016 8:06 am
DOC wrote:Leading Teams has probably saved South significant money and time.
Over time, we have had a succesion of coaching, captain and team personnel changes that has cost us plenty, and not just money.
Under Gotchy and the Leading Teams people, we have become a far more cohesive unit which has resulted in stability and accountability through the senior playing group.
Especially when money is tight, it is the wise investment that gives the best dividends.
by JK » Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:23 am
Booney wrote:As you well know though JK, on field success doesn't always equal off field financial security. Spending vital funds on leadership ( on field ) programs when the off field is struggling seems counterproductive to me.
by JK » Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:24 am
Wedgie wrote:Load of wank IMHO.
Some teams that have used it have been top, some have been bottom, some have been in between. Hardly compelling.
by heater31 » Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:26 am
JK wrote:Booney wrote:As you well know though JK, on field success doesn't always equal off field financial security. Spending vital funds on leadership ( on field ) programs when the off field is struggling seems counterproductive to me.
Yeah it's a fair argument mate .. Thankfully we were in a position where we could afford it, but for all clubs with a perilious bottom line it's just another expense, the benefits of which need to be weighed up against cost.
by whufc » Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:37 am
Wedgie wrote:Load of wank IMHO.
Some teams that have used it have been top, some have been bottom, some have been in between. Hardly compelling.
by Wedgie » Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:49 am
whufc wrote:Wedgie wrote:Load of wank IMHO.
Some teams that have used it have been top, some have been bottom, some have been in between. Hardly compelling.
Having been part of both the greatest dynasties in SANFL and AFL history is a pretty handy side note to add to your resume and marketing.
Leading teams strike rate is pretty handy especially when you throw in the on field turn around see saw at Norwood and South as well.
by Booney » Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:50 am
whufc wrote:Wedgie wrote:Load of wank IMHO.
Some teams that have used it have been top, some have been bottom, some have been in between. Hardly compelling.
Having been part of both the greatest dynasties in SANFL and AFL history is a pretty handy side note to add to your resume and marketing.
Leading teams strike rate is pretty handy especially when you throw in the on field turn around see saw at Norwood and South as well.
by Wedgie » Wed Nov 09, 2016 9:51 am
by whufc » Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:03 am
Wedgie wrote:whufc wrote:Wedgie wrote:Load of wank IMHO.
Some teams that have used it have been top, some have been bottom, some have been in between. Hardly compelling.
Having been part of both the greatest dynasties in SANFL and AFL history is a pretty handy side note to add to your resume and marketing.
Leading teams strike rate is pretty handy especially when you throw in the on field turn around see saw at Norwood and South as well.
Throw in North Adelaide, Gold Coast, St Kilda and Melbourne and it's even more impressive.
I'm going to send a Xmas card to all 18 AFL clubs and 10 SANFL clubs.
If any of them win a flag it will be my Xmas card that caused it.
by Wedgie » Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:12 am
whufc wrote:There not at 100% of the clubs and as I said they can lay claim to be involved in both the AFL and SANFLS greatest dynasty.
by Magellan » Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:17 am
Wedgie wrote:whufc wrote:Wedgie wrote:Load of wank IMHO.
Some teams that have used it have been top, some have been bottom, some have been in between. Hardly compelling.
Having been part of both the greatest dynasties in SANFL and AFL history is a pretty handy side note to add to your resume and marketing.
Leading teams strike rate is pretty handy especially when you throw in the on field turn around see saw at Norwood and South as well.
Throw in North Adelaide, Gold Coast, St Kilda and Melbourne and it's even more impressive.
I'm going to send a Xmas card to all 18 AFL clubs and 10 SANFL clubs.
If any of them win a flag it will be my Xmas card that caused it.
by whufc » Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:37 am
Wedgie wrote:whufc wrote:There not at 100% of the clubs and as I said they can lay claim to be involved in both the AFL and SANFLS greatest dynasty.
They were involved with Collingwood in the 1920s and Norwood in the 1800s?
How did the only club in the NRL involved with Leading Teams, Newcastle go this year?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |