RB wrote:As a Swans fan, it's most satisfying to see guys like Kennedy, Mattner, McGlynn, Richards etc. do well after being surplus to requirements at other teams.
I think you guys have done well in that area.
by stan » Mon Apr 18, 2016 2:15 pm
RB wrote:As a Swans fan, it's most satisfying to see guys like Kennedy, Mattner, McGlynn, Richards etc. do well after being surplus to requirements at other teams.
by JK » Mon Apr 18, 2016 3:08 pm
by RB » Mon Apr 18, 2016 4:37 pm
by stan » Mon Apr 18, 2016 4:44 pm
JK wrote:Reckon Sydney have been the best "recyclers" for a long time. Players like Lockett, Roos and Schwass came as established stars, but Hall, Bolton, Kennedy, McGlynn, Mumford, Richards, Maxfield etc really found new levels with the Swans.
by JK » Mon Apr 18, 2016 5:23 pm
RB wrote:Throw in Jolly, Schauble, Paul Williams, Jason Ball, and Nick Davis.
by JK » Mon Apr 18, 2016 5:23 pm
stan wrote:JK wrote:Reckon Sydney have been the best "recyclers" for a long time. Players like Lockett, Roos and Schwass came as established stars, but Hall, Bolton, Kennedy, McGlynn, Mumford, Richards, Maxfield etc really found new levels with the Swans.
I dont think Lockett was anymore "recycled" than Buddy and Tippett were.
by stan » Mon Apr 18, 2016 6:39 pm
JK wrote:stan wrote:JK wrote:Reckon Sydney have been the best "recyclers" for a long time. Players like Lockett, Roos and Schwass came as established stars, but Hall, Bolton, Kennedy, McGlynn, Mumford, Richards, Maxfield etc really found new levels with the Swans.
I dont think Lockett was anymore "recycled" than Buddy and Tippett were.
Yeah I kinda said that mate
by woodublieve12 » Mon Apr 18, 2016 8:46 pm
JK wrote:RB wrote:Throw in Jolly, Schauble, Paul Williams, Jason Ball, and Nick Davis.
Yeah knew there were others, would guess there still is.
by heater31 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:13 am
bennymacca wrote:Tony Armstrong
by woodublieve12 » Tue Apr 19, 2016 10:18 am
heater31 wrote:bennymacca wrote:Tony Armstrong
They improved him and then passed him onto Collingwood....
by MW » Tue Apr 19, 2016 3:40 pm
by woodublieve12 » Sun Apr 24, 2016 10:40 am
by daysofourlives » Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:42 pm
by woodublieve12 » Sun Apr 24, 2016 2:57 pm
daysofourlives wrote:What a load of crap, Sydney not even on the same planet when it comes to age compared to 93 Essendon and they were given a chance to win the flag at the start of the year.
No surprise they are better without a certain flog in their team.
Im more than happy to play any team that has "footsteps"Grundy as a key defender.
by woodublieve12 » Sun Apr 24, 2016 3:06 pm
by daysofourlives » Sun Apr 24, 2016 3:07 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:What a load of crap, Sydney not even on the same planet when it comes to age compared to 93 Essendon and they were given a chance to win the flag at the start of the year.
No surprise they are better without a certain flog in their team.
Im more than happy to play any team that has "footsteps"Grundy as a key defender.
Another quality post by you..
by woodublieve12 » Sun Apr 24, 2016 3:10 pm
daysofourlives wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:daysofourlives wrote:What a load of crap, Sydney not even on the same planet when it comes to age compared to 93 Essendon and they were given a chance to win the flag at the start of the year.
No surprise they are better without a certain flog in their team.
Im more than happy to play any team that has "footsteps"Grundy as a key defender.
Another quality post by you..
I thought so, pretty factual I wouldve thought, Hewett and Papley the only rookies how many did Essendon have?
by daysofourlives » Sun Apr 24, 2016 3:13 pm
by woodublieve12 » Sun Apr 24, 2016 3:33 pm
daysofourlives wrote:sorry i knew i forgot one.
So that was Essendons GF side ave age, what was the sydney figure, im guessing its the entire lists average age not yesterdays team which is whats relevant
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |