by gadj1976 » Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:00 pm
by mighty hounds » Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:11 pm
by daysofourlives » Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:11 pm
mighty hounds wrote:If zones come into the game then i will stop watching, idea is ridiculous
by LaughingKookaburra » Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:35 pm
by test » Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:42 pm
LaughingKookaburra wrote:perhaps we should get the umpiring right first before we start worrying about other things. Reward the bloke first to the footy more and penalise incorrect disposal. If there is issues after that still then we can at least tick off the basics on the list.
FWIW the biggest issue to me is the number of teams in the comp.
by Q. » Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:56 pm
by daysofourlives » Sun Aug 09, 2015 11:08 pm
Q. wrote:The football doesn't need fixing. The umpiring needs a goddam overhaul.
by Ian » Mon Aug 10, 2015 6:31 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:perhaps we should get the umpiring right first before we start worrying about other things. Reward the bloke first to the footy more and penalise incorrect disposal. If there is issues after that still then we can at least tick off the basics on the list.
FWIW the biggest issue to me is the number of teams in the comp.
by cracka » Mon Aug 10, 2015 6:54 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:55 am
by Booney » Mon Aug 10, 2015 9:27 am
by mighty hounds » Mon Aug 10, 2015 10:32 am
daysofourlives wrote:mighty hounds wrote:If zones come into the game then i will stop watching, idea is ridiculous
I dont mind having one player must be in F50 at all times. As long as one player has to be it opens the door for a Tony Lockett type to come back into the game and I can guarantee coaches will not leave that type of player one out so will send another back, then the attacking coach will send one to man him up. Then the defensive coach will want an extra so he sends another one which the forward coach will man up and before you know it we'll have 6 players in the forward line again.
Problem solved, unless im missing something
by marbles » Mon Aug 10, 2015 10:33 am
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Aug 10, 2015 10:39 am
by mighty hounds » Mon Aug 10, 2015 10:42 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:There are far too many teams and the talent pool is thin
not sure we need to implement zones etc
the game like global warming has always been in a cycle.
Only 10yrs ago the same debate was happening with the Swans and then came along Geelongs attacking style.
now the game has slipped into defence first but we have the Dogs coming through and opening the game up just as the Cats were able to do.
the main issue is the umpiring and ridiculous tinkering of the rules....
by marbles » Mon Aug 10, 2015 10:48 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:I think we should step back in time and untweak a few things that didn't need tweaking.
* Piss the interchange cap off.
by Q. » Mon Aug 10, 2015 11:11 am
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Aug 10, 2015 11:17 am
Q. wrote:Ah yes, tired players, just what we need. Tired players translates to lower disposal efficiency. Lower disposal efficiency equals turnovers. Turnovers makes footy shit to watch.
by Rik E Boy » Mon Aug 10, 2015 12:40 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |