by Dogwatcher » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:46 am
by Dogwatcher » Thu Apr 16, 2015 11:47 am
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 1:05 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Sorry, because it was posted with your other commentary, I thought you were inferring something. Apologies.
by bulldogproud2 » Thu Apr 16, 2015 4:23 pm
stan wrote:I wasnt aware that apparently Labor had an election promise of 100k new jobs by next year. I would say they would be in the negative at the moment as currently they are reducing the public service numbers.
by stan » Thu Apr 16, 2015 5:58 pm
bulldogproud2 wrote:stan wrote:I wasnt aware that apparently Labor had an election promise of 100k new jobs by next year. I would say they would be in the negative at the moment as currently they are reducing the public service numbers.
The main reason the Libs are keeping quiet is because Labor were reasonably on track prior to the change of Federal government. Over 30000 jobs had been created to that point. Unfortunately 20000 of these, primarily in manufacturing have gone under the Abbott government.
by RustyCage » Thu Apr 16, 2015 7:02 pm
by Psyber » Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:07 pm
by heater31 » Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:18 pm
by Psyber » Fri Apr 17, 2015 5:39 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:30 pm
bulldogproud2 wrote:stan wrote:I wasnt aware that apparently Labor had an election promise of 100k new jobs by next year. I would say they would be in the negative at the moment as currently they are reducing the public service numbers.
The main reason the Libs are keeping quiet is because Labor were reasonably on track prior to the change of Federal government. Over 30000 jobs had been created to that point. Unfortunately 20000 of these, primarily in manufacturing have gone under the Abbott government.
by stan » Mon Apr 20, 2015 4:14 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Apr 20, 2015 5:10 pm
by stan » Mon Apr 20, 2015 6:02 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:12 pm
stan wrote:Bloody hell Jim, im sick of your crap. This damn use of facts and figures to back up your argument has no place in this forum.
by Gozu » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:17 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:The Govt don't like me.....
I'm doing analysis for one media outlet and they're getting the "heat" for being too "enthusiastic" and not just accepting the Govt line
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Apr 20, 2015 10:36 pm
Gozu wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:The Govt don't like me.....
I'm doing analysis for one media outlet and they're getting the "heat" for being too "enthusiastic" and not just accepting the Govt line
The Bolt Report doesn't count as a media outlet.
by stan » Tue Apr 21, 2015 12:10 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Tue Apr 21, 2015 12:21 pm
stan wrote:Poor Tom, the feds think he is a absolute lunatic. Lol some good old fashioned name calling.
by Dogwatcher » Tue Apr 21, 2015 12:29 pm
by stan » Tue Apr 21, 2015 12:37 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:stan wrote:Poor Tom, the feds think he is a absolute lunatic. Lol some good old fashioned name calling.
It was very funny
You watch TK sue for defamation now.
They are going to have to build those new courts just to house his cases
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |