Adelaide Oval Football Membership Price Increase

[Red Rocket]

Give Port $20m a year and they would still find a way to blow it. Maybe all the money has gone into that black hole at Alberton.
Cant wait until they start losing again and their fans drop off like flies again, will be great to see the tarps at AO

[LaughingKookaburra]

If you think over the years the AFL would have pumped as much coin in to Port as the SANFL has then you're off your head.

[kickinit]

If you think over the years the AFL would have pumped as much coin in to Port as the SANFL has then you're off your head.

The money the SANFL pumped in is only small change to the AFL. The money the afl gets from the TV deal would of been worth more then what the sanfl pumped in all up. So to think they wouldn't is just plain stupid.

[dedja]

Give them all a fair deal and then charge the earth for them to field a side in the SANFL

Probably the way to go to be honest. Seriously the SANFL making 15mil on teams they dont hold licenses for maybe a bit extreme.

That's why they sold the licenses at ridiculously low prices because this agreement was already entered into.
If the Crows want to pay cost price plus compensation and the Power two dozen empty bottles plus the compensation they've receieved then the SANFL will be all ears as well as compensation for revenue lost at Footy Pk.
300 million should cover it.

The reason behind moving to AO was to have a lean management so the clubs could make more money. The SANFL was suppose to make it's money through the sale or renting out Footy park. At the current moment the SANFL isn't doing it part it agree to when it entered the SMA board, it also could find it self in a tricky situation if it doesn't change it ways.

If Port keep squealing like stuck pigs and don't like the deal they signed up to, in which the SMA delivered exactly what they said and were contracted to, then go ahead and build your own stadium, and while you're at it, pay back all the SANFL money you've blown through incompetence.

How faarking hard is it? Profit --> Revenue > Expenditure

Should be sponsored by Centrelink FFS ...

[kickinit]

If Port keep squealing like stuck pigs and don't like the deal they signed up to, in which the SMA delivered exactly what they said and were contracted to, then go ahead and build your own stadium, and while you're at it, pay back all the SANFL money you've blown through incompetence.

How faarking hard is it? Profit --> Revenue > Expenditure

Should be sponsored by Centrelink FFS ...

Oh poor Dedja coming here to have a cry about port again. The SMA was contracted to produce a lean management for AO. The SANFL making $14.9m isn't what they were contracted to do. At the current moment the SANFL have broken there agreement on the SMA board. We also have our own stadium the one the Government owns and renovated for us. You are always welcome to head back to the crap hole at west lakes if you don't like it. Because at this very moment the SANFL are on the verge of only having west lakes.

[dedja]

Which contract clause did the SMA break? The same contract that Port signed at the time.

And FFS, go back to school and learn English.

[Jim05]

If Port keep squealing like stuck pigs and don't like the deal they signed up to, in which the SMA delivered exactly what they said and were contracted to, then go ahead and build your own stadium, and while you're at it, pay back all the SANFL money you've blown through incompetence.

How faarking hard is it? Profit --> Revenue > Expenditure

Should be sponsored by Centrelink FFS ...

Oh poor Dedja coming here to have a cry about port again. The SMA was contracted to produce a lean management for AO. The SANFL making $14.9m isn't what they were contracted to do. At the current moment the SANFL have broken there agreement on the SMA board. We also have our own stadium the one the Government owns and renovated for us. You are always welcome to head back to the crap hole at west lakes if you don't like it. Because at this very moment the SANFL are on the verge of only having west lakes.

Id be quite happy for the 2 AFL teams to get all the revenue from AO, then they can both pay $5m a year to play in the SANFL, Crows can then pay rent for West Lakes and everyone lives happily

[daysofourlives]

If Port keep squealing like stuck pigs and don't like the deal they signed up to, in which the SMA delivered exactly what they said and were contracted to, then go ahead and build your own stadium, and while you're at it, pay back all the SANFL money you've blown through incompetence.

How faarking hard is it? Profit --> Revenue > Expenditure

Should be sponsored by Centrelink FFS ...

Oh poor Dedja coming here to have a cry about port again. The SMA was contracted to produce a lean management for AO. The SANFL making $14.9m isn't what they were contracted to do. At the current moment the SANFL have broken there agreement on the SMA board. We also have our own stadium the one the Government owns and renovated for us. You are always welcome to head back to the crap hole at west lakes if you don't like it. Because at this very moment the SANFL are on the verge of only having west lakes.

Id be quite happy for the 2 AFL teams to get all the revenue from AO, then they can both pay $5m a year to play in the SANFL, Crows can then pay rent for West Lakes and everyone lives happily

Yep and when Port drop back to sub 20k crowds the SANFL's income isnt affected and this time it will be up to the AFL to bail Port out

[kickinit]

Which contract clause did the SMA break? The same contract that Port signed at the time.

And FFS, go back to school and learn English.

The clause in the contract that states they are meant to run the SMA to a lean budget to generate maximum returns to the AFL clubs.

[Jim05]

Which contract clause did the SMA break? The same contract that Port signed at the time.

And FFS, go back to school and learn English.

The clause in the contract that states they are meant to run the SMA to a lean budget to generate maximum returns to the AFL clubs.

Perhaps you missed the part in the contract where Demetriou gave the SANFL a grace period

[cracka]

Wow, there is only about 4 posts related to the actual topic, is that a record.

[daysofourlives]

Wow, there is only about 4 posts related to the actual topic, is that a record.

Oh the Forum Police have arrived

[stan]

Wow, there is only about 4 posts related to the actual topic, is that a record.

Although its nice that it didnt turn into a No AFL in the SANFL thread.

[JK]

Which contract clause did the SMA break? The same contract that Port signed at the time.

And FFS, go back to school and learn English.

The clause in the contract that states they are meant to run the SMA to a lean budget to generate maximum returns to the AFL clubs.

Noine is going to present nor sign a contract with such loose wording (open to interpretation from each party that has their own vested interest)

[Booney]

Is it, in simple terms, the return Adelaide and Port got was based on the estimated crowds they would draw in?

ie - Adelaide 40,000 and Port 30,000 ( I know these aren't the numbers )

Meanwhile Adelaide draw 47,000 and Port 44,000 and the revenue stayed at the same level as the estimates provided?

[carey]

Is it, in simple terms, the return Adelaide and Port got was based on the estimated crowds they would draw in?

ie - Adelaide 40,000 and Port 30,000 ( I know these aren't the numbers )

Meanwhile Adelaide draw 47,000 and Port 44,000 and the revenue stayed at the same level as the estimates provided?

Way to sensible of a theory for this thread, Please move on Booney..........

[stan]

After weeks of coping it about the stadium deal the SANFL has fire a shot back at he AFL. Preparing to hand over a 10mil cheque to clear the debt with the AFL and hence reduce there power.

Its a good move by the SANFL, basically saying the clubs cam whinge all they like, we are in charge.

Well played SANFL.