old farmer wrote:Sorry PG. I went back as little as round 8 2014 and found a home loss. Good story though.
Oh shit how could I forget about that!
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:34 pm
old farmer wrote:Sorry PG. I went back as little as round 8 2014 and found a home loss. Good story though.
by Senor Moto Gadili » Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:48 pm
Jetters wrote:Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Jetters wrote:Roaring Lion! wrote:Central United play hard but are a very disciplined unit of young blokes so it's sad to see that from the actions of 1 x loose cannon have cost them their season & any chance of playing finals this year but this will make the playing group hungry for success next season.
Harsh penalty seeing the huge improvement out there but guess this a huge warning to all clubs that bad behaviour is being cracked down on with heavy consequences & all coaches have to look out for their playing groups & remove these types of players from the ground for a rest before they get tired as that's when frustration boils over which now hurts your whole club.
This is bizarre comment.
Going by their record (what else could you go by!?) they are the most ill disciplined, or very close to, club in the SAAFL.
Not bizarre at all. I'm sure Roaring Lion's comment is based on his observations in 2014, not previous seasons. Those that have played against Central United in 2014 would agree that they have been hard at it, but disciplined......unfortunately for them, with one obvious exception.
You can't just ignore previous seasons.
And you can't disregard the most heavily penalised incident this year of shithousery as a mere exception. It more or less just never happens at 90% of clubs. Just a select few.
by Jetters » Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:52 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Jetters wrote:You can't just ignore previous seasons.
And you can't disregard the most heavily penalised incident this year of shithousery as a mere exception. It more or less just never happens at 90% of clubs. Just a select few.
Yes you can. How long do you expect a club to be judged on previous seasons? For all you know they may have replaced the entire playing list, committee and coach.
Fact of the matter is that only two players have been suspended from Central United this season - Brad Woodward for abusive language (1 week) back in something like Round 4, and this moron Bain, so that would tell me that they have been a disciplined side on every other occasion - and that is what the people who faced them will judge them on - not something they may have done in previous seasons.
by Jetters » Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:54 pm
This is bizarre comment.
Going by their record (what else could you go by!?) they are the most ill disciplined, or very close to, club in the SAAFL.
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:01 pm
Jetters wrote:Even if judged on this year they are one of the most heavily penalised clubs, this does not suggest a significant improvement from an objective point of view.
Jetters wrote:But this incident basically never happens at nearly all clubs!
by Esteban Vihaio » Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:58 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Jetters wrote:Even if judged on this year they are one of the most heavily penalised clubs, this does not suggest a significant improvement from an objective point of view.
Heavily penalised as in total matches received - yes
Heavily penalised as in total players incurring suspension - noJetters wrote:But this incident basically never happens at nearly all clubs!
Which part? The report? The suspension? The striking? The spitting?
It's obvious the SAAFL are enforcing severe penalties this year to send a very clear message to clubs and players, you only need to look at the severity of a lot of suspensions this year to see that.
10x players this season have been suspended for 5 or more games for an individual incident.
38x seperate clubs have fronted the tribunal this season.
by Yank Man » Mon Jul 28, 2014 8:13 pm
Jetters wrote:This is bizarre comment.
Going by their record (what else could you go by!?) they are the most ill disciplined, or very close to, club in the SAAFL.
Not bizarre at all. I'm sure Roaring Lion's comment is based on his observations in 2014, not previous seasons. Those that have played against Central United in 2014 would agree that they have been hard at it, but disciplined......unfortunately for them, with one obvious exception.
by Roaring Lion! » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:15 pm
by Yank Man » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:55 pm
Roaring Lion! wrote:Jetters that's the beauty about safooty forums is that everyone can make comments on what they see or games we are involved in or even have an opinion in general
by Jetters » Mon Jul 28, 2014 10:21 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Mon Jul 28, 2014 11:49 pm
Esteban Vihaio wrote:Did you post that? Or just think that?
The life bans? The what was it, 30+ games suspensions in one seasons? When the sh*t hit the umpires door?
BTW - A team can still be hard at it and win a flag
by carey » Mon Jul 28, 2014 11:54 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:36 am
by human_torpedo » Tue Jul 29, 2014 9:39 am
by morell » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:50 am
by Hefty » Tue Jul 29, 2014 10:57 am
Jetters wrote:Just sharing my opinion Yankman as Roaring Lion described
No one has anything to say in Div 3.
Im sure its frustrating and unfair on those who are doing the right thing, but for people to say they are disciplined is evidently not the case if they are responsible for the most feral incident in the SAAFL this year.
by jo172 » Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:06 am
by morell » Tue Jul 29, 2014 1:06 pm
by marbles » Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:26 pm
morell wrote:Exactly jo. I think what the league is doing is obviously working.
by beeroclock » Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:41 pm
marbles wrote:morell wrote:Exactly jo. I think what the league is doing is obviously working.
agree to most degrees but taking their victories away which they earnt fairly and squarely needs a rethink IMO
having future games confiscated and rewarded to the opposition is the fair way for me
9 weeks suspension = 9 future quarters forfeited & the game in which the incident occurred is also forfieted
so...
Round 14: Blackfriars rewarded victory (game of the incident)
Round 15: Angle rewarded victory - a CU forfieted game
Round 16: Mitchell Park rewarded victory - a CU forfeited game
CU now have 1 quarter carry over points
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |