by gossipgirl » Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:40 am
by nuggety goodness » Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:40 am
by Booney » Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:45 am
nuggety goodness wrote:Q. wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:As soon as it is changed once the precedent will be set and you will see people marrying dogs, cats and probably inanimate objects too.
It doesn't set any precedent.
Allowing gay marriage won't have any legal effect on polygamy, incest or bestiality. They are separate areas of law.
Its already happened as I pointed out earlier...
by HH3 » Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:46 am
nuggety goodness wrote:Ok, expect a bump in the future though.
by Booney » Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:47 am
by Q. » Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:47 am
nuggety goodness wrote:Q. wrote:
It still doesn't set precedent. In Australia, they are separate areas of law.
Also, if you want to argue the slippery slope, then it starts at allowing marriage full stop. By logic, your argument that a man and woman can get married sets precedent for any other type of marriage.
Then saying that means that all law is then liable for being abolished and we would live in utter chaos...
Human nature is to push the boundaries and once someone else gets it changed then 'hey I might as well push my case too' because that is the mentality.
If I'm wrong then I'll shut up but just wait and see...
I feel like Noah right now. The rain is coming people!!!
by nuggety goodness » Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:49 am
HH3 wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:Ok, expect a bump in the future though.
Just out of interest, what are your views on gay people in general, regardless if they can get married or not. Are you against gay relationships, or do you think they should be viewed as the same as a straight relationship?
If you've said all this in another thread, whats it called, so I can have a look-see.
by HH3 » Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:53 am
nuggety goodness wrote:HH3 wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:Ok, expect a bump in the future though.
Just out of interest, what are your views on gay people in general, regardless if they can get married or not. Are you against gay relationships, or do you think they should be viewed as the same as a straight relationship?
If you've said all this in another thread, whats it called, so I can have a look-see.
People are people and they have the right to choose whatever lifestyle they like. I have friends that are gay, they know I dont agree with their lifestyle and they often dont agree with mine but I dont treat them any differently.
by bennymacca » Wed Jul 09, 2014 11:58 am
nuggety goodness wrote:HH3 wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:Ok, expect a bump in the future though.
Just out of interest, what are your views on gay people in general, regardless if they can get married or not. Are you against gay relationships, or do you think they should be viewed as the same as a straight relationship?
If you've said all this in another thread, whats it called, so I can have a look-see.
People are people and they have the right to choose whatever lifestyle they like. I have friends that are gay, they know I dont agree with their lifestyle and they often dont agree with mine but I dont treat them any differently.
by bennymacca » Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:00 pm
Q. wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:Q. wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:As soon as it is changed once the precedent will be set and you will see people marrying dogs, cats and probably inanimate objects too.
It doesn't set any precedent.
Allowing gay marriage won't have any legal effect on polygamy, incest or bestiality. They are separate areas of law.
Its already happened as I pointed out earlier...
It still doesn't set precedent. In Australia, they are separate areas of law.
Also, if you want to argue the slippery slope, then it starts at allowing marriage full stop. By logic, your argument that a man and woman can get married sets precedent for any other type of marriage.
by Booney » Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:10 pm
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:26 pm
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:30 pm
by Pseudo » Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:34 pm
Booney wrote:Polygamy is not a question of if you're allowed to, it's why the **** do you want to?
by Pseudo » Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:36 pm
nuggety goodness wrote:Ok, expect a bump in the future though.
by HH3 » Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:36 pm
by gossipgirl » Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:43 pm
nuggety goodness wrote:HH3 wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:Ok, expect a bump in the future though.
Just out of interest, what are your views on gay people in general, regardless if they can get married or not. Are you against gay relationships, or do you think they should be viewed as the same as a straight relationship?
If you've said all this in another thread, whats it called, so I can have a look-see.
People are people and they have the right to choose whatever lifestyle they like. I have friends that are gay, they know I dont agree with their lifestyle and they often dont agree with mine but I dont treat them any differently.
by Booney » Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:02 pm
The Ash Man wrote:I've run out of popcorn
by HH3 » Wed Jul 09, 2014 1:04 pm
Booney wrote:The Ash Man wrote:I've run out of popcorn
The consequences of which are the business of one man and his popcorn alone.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |