by heater31 » Tue May 06, 2014 5:25 pm
by Bounce of the ball » Tue May 06, 2014 5:47 pm
by wild dog » Wed May 07, 2014 11:28 am
by wild dog » Wed May 07, 2014 11:34 am
Bounce of the ball wrote:Unfortunately for Symes this wasn't the first head knock. Maybe that needs to be taken into account as well. Yes the game has changed but was it that bad ? Least he didn't cop gutless ones from behind or in packs .Ironic.
by Dogwatcher » Thu May 08, 2014 10:36 am
bennymacca wrote:This is the exact reason the AFL want to legislate the bump out of the game, and if you look at it in this context they are right
by bennymacca » Thu May 08, 2014 10:58 am
by tigerpie » Thu May 08, 2014 11:19 am
by bennymacca » Thu May 08, 2014 11:25 am
by tigerpie » Thu May 08, 2014 11:34 am
by tigerpie » Fri May 09, 2014 11:28 am
tigerpie wrote:We have to expect collisions in our game...its a collision sport.
Cases like Viney's have to be dismissed.
Firstly...he couldnt stop for the threat of doing a knee.
Secondly...he couldnt spin out of the impact, as again, threat of doing a knee.
Players arent superhumans. They are limited by the mechanics of the body and mind.
All Viney could do was stay low and try to NOT hit him in the head....which he did.
Appeal upheld i reckon.
by The Apostle » Sat May 10, 2014 7:52 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |