by Booney » Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:37 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:42 am
by mal » Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:13 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:18 am
by bennymacca » Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:23 am
mal wrote:I will post this before Dedja does
Which Bookmaker got to him ?
by mal » Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:26 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Could be Tommy, he was taking bets on a dead horse for the Melbourne cup and more importantly he knows what punters want
by geppscrossrams » Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:39 am
6. Dangerous and unfair bowling
(a) Bowling of fast short pitched balls
(i) The bowling of fast short pitched balls is dangerous and unfair if the bowler’s end umpire considers that by their repetition and taking into account their length, height and direction they are likely to inflict physical injury on the striker irrespective of the protective equipment he may be wearing. The relative skill of the striker shall be taken into consideration.
(ii) Any delivery which, after pitching, passes or would have passed over head height of the striker standing upright at the popping crease, although not threatening physical injury, shall be included with bowling under (i) above, both when the umpire is considering whether the bowling of fast short pitched balls has become dangerous and unfair and after he has so decided. The umpire shall call and signal No ball for each such delivery.
(b) Bowling of high full pitched balls
(i) Any delivery, other than a slow paced one, which passes or would have passed on the full above waist height of the striker standing upright at the popping crease is to be deemed dangerous and unfair, whether or not it is likely to inflict physical injury on the striker.
(ii) A slow delivery which passes or would have passed on the full above shoulder height of the striker standing upright at the popping crease is to be deemed dangerous and unfair, whether or not it is likely to inflict physical injury on the striker.
by Booney » Wed Mar 05, 2014 12:12 pm
by Dogwatcher » Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:18 pm
by MAY-Z » Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:24 pm
The ICC's playing conditions for ODIs, however, supersede the MCC's Laws for international cricket and according to them fast bowlers and spinners are treated the same. A bowler is warned after his first waist-high full toss, and barred from bowling if he bowls a second.
by bennymacca » Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:25 pm
MAY-Z wrote:the umpire didnt make any mistake at all (if anything he was generous giving him a third opportunity).
playing conditions are a step higher than the rules.The ICC's playing conditions for ODIs, however, supersede the MCC's Laws for international cricket and according to them fast bowlers and spinners are treated the same. A bowler is warned after his first waist-high full toss, and barred from bowling if he bowls a second.
by Jim05 » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:09 pm
bennymacca wrote:MAY-Z wrote:the umpire didnt make any mistake at all (if anything he was generous giving him a third opportunity).
playing conditions are a step higher than the rules.The ICC's playing conditions for ODIs, however, supersede the MCC's Laws for international cricket and according to them fast bowlers and spinners are treated the same. A bowler is warned after his first waist-high full toss, and barred from bowling if he bowls a second.
this is how i umpired it at local level, waist high is a no ball, for anyone.
by bennymacca » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:14 pm
by Jim05 » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:15 pm
bennymacca wrote:Would love a definite ruling on that, I was under the impression it changed a year or two ago
by MAY-Z » Wed Mar 05, 2014 6:29 pm
bennymacca wrote:Would love a definite ruling on that, I was under the impression it changed a year or two ago
by Dogwatcher » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:47 am
MAY-Z wrote:the umpire didnt make any mistake at all (if anything he was generous giving him a third opportunity).
playing conditions are a step higher than the rules.The ICC's playing conditions for ODIs, however, supersede the MCC's Laws for international cricket and according to them fast bowlers and spinners are treated the same. A bowler is warned after his first waist-high full toss, and barred from bowling if he bowls a second.
by bennymacca » Thu Mar 06, 2014 9:53 am
MAY-Z wrote:bennymacca wrote:Would love a definite ruling on that, I was under the impression it changed a year or two ago
You would need to consult your competitions specific playing conditions. The laws of the game say its not a no ball but each competition (just like the odi's) has its own specifics.
Personally I think it should be a no ball for any bowler as that makes it much simpler to adjudicate at every level and reduces any argument a to what is a slow bowler versus a fast bowler.
by Trader » Thu Mar 06, 2014 12:10 pm
MAY-Z wrote:Personally I think it should be a no ball for any bowler as that makes it much simpler to adjudicate at every level and reduces any argument a to what is a slow bowler versus a fast bowler.
by Rik E Boy » Tue Mar 18, 2014 1:53 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |