Phantom Gossiper wrote:Well considering you gutless pricks are having a swipe at both Enfield and the committee - knowing full well they don't have profiles on here, what did you think?!?
I'm sure most if not all teams would've agreed that denying the permit was in the best interests of the comp not you prima donnas!! World doesn't revolve around Rose Park, all you do is whinge and complain!
Having a swipe at other clubs describes around 50% of your posts on this forum Phantom with the rest being some sort of whinge or complaint.
Phantom Gossiper wrote:I've heard Rose Park have cried and so the C&CCA have done a backflip anyway..
Crying and backflips is how you and your captain got appointed this year.
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Why would I play? I'm not at the club to play and the side is coming off two wins why change it? Think about it!
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Having said that I will play the occasional game in any grade when needed
You are obviously some combination of arrogant, naive and stupid to not realise how hypocritical and contradictory you are.
dark & stormy wrote:I still loves ya phantom......lol. I dont know any facts or whats going on with this chad parrish...but. we should encourage players to our comp regardless of their talents or who they are. if he owes money or doesnt who cares ? surely chad and the team that says he owes money can sort it out and keep it off an open forum ? I would love the challenge of playing against better players (even if it means a bruise or 10 ) all I am trying to say is we need new blood in our comp or we will be stagnent and the comp will dwindle away till no one is left. IMO...... im not a fan of anyone and I have burnt alot of bridges with the way I play but , I will still play with my head high and I still want to play against the best in our comp. let chad play I say......... well thats my 2 cents worth , like it or not lol.
The Riddler wrote:I hope the comp doesn't expect us to help out with association players when they give us no support!
no one expects you guys to help out with association games as they are played on Sundays and we learnt from the weekend none of you can give up both days of your weekend.
would also love to see how your club would react/whinge if an ex player owed u money and was still getting permits to play in round 4.
The Riddler wrote:I hope the comp doesn't expect us to help out with association players when they give us no support!
no one expects you guys to help out with association games as they are played on Sundays and we learnt from the weekend none of you can give up both days of your weekend.
would also love to see how your club would react/whinge if an ex player owed u money and was still getting permits to play in round 4.
Good morning Express and thank you for your constructive thoughtful input into the situation.
So you know Chad owes money? You know all the facts do you?
I'm sure if a ex Rose Park player did owe money and went elsewhere and followed the recommendations set down by all parties for a resolution, Rose Park would have no issue with him playing, why would you want to stop people from playing cricket?
I am also glad you can speak on behalf of the association and not want any Rose park players to play the association games.
Don't be so down, have a nice day and remember the sun comes up each day.
The Riddler wrote:I hope the comp doesn't expect us to help out with association players when they give us no support!
no one expects you guys to help out with association games as they are played on Sundays and we learnt from the weekend none of you can give up both days of your weekend.
would also love to see how your club would react/whinge if an ex player owed u money and was still getting permits to play in round 4.
Good morning Express and thank you for your constructive thoughtful input into the situation.
So you know Chad owes money? You know all the facts do you?
I'm sure if a ex Rose Park player did owe money and went elsewhere and followed the recommendations set down by all parties for a resolution, Rose Park would have no issue with him playing, why would you want to stop people from playing cricket?
I am also glad you can speak on behalf of the association and not want any Rose park players to play the association games.
Don't be so down, have a nice day and remember the sun comes up each day.
Never said association dont want rose park players to play association games. Just that u guys wouldnt put ur hands up to play on sunday. As u all showed 4 days ago.
The Riddler wrote:I hope the comp doesn't expect us to help out with association players when they give us no support!
no one expects you guys to help out with association games as they are played on Sundays and we learnt from the weekend none of you can give up both days of your weekend.
would also love to see how your club would react/whinge if an ex player owed u money and was still getting permits to play in round 4.
Good morning Express and thank you for your constructive thoughtful input into the situation.
So you know Chad owes money? You know all the facts do you?
I'm sure if a ex Rose Park player did owe money and went elsewhere and followed the recommendations set down by all parties for a resolution, Rose Park would have no issue with him playing, why would you want to stop people from playing cricket?
I am also glad you can speak on behalf of the association and not want any Rose park players to play the association games.
Don't be so down, have a nice day and remember the sun comes up each day.
Never said association dont want rose park players to play association games. Just that u guys wouldnt put ur hands up to play on sunday. As u all showed 4 days ago.
how can you say that ?????? we at NEK did not put a side in on sunday ...we have players that play in the assoc side on a sunday . para vista also did not play sunday , but still have players in the assoc side. your comments look like you are purely having a go at rose park ? I am not sticking up for rose park by any means ....lol...(we have a hate , hate relationship lol) but ......if you say crap like that then you better look at all sides that didnt play sunday but play assoc games . now back to more important things....YES WE WANT AND NEED DUTCHY BACK IN CHURCHES....YES...HE WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE....YES ..AUTO IS STILL THE ALMIGHTY HANDSOME ONE.....YES ..BALDO IS STILL AN ANGRY RANGA.....YES....LET CHAD PLAY....see you on saturday auto, keep the drinks cold.
no one expects you guys to help out with association games as they are played on Sundays and we learnt from the weekend none of you can give up both days of your weekend.
would also love to see how your club would react/whinge if an ex player owed u money and was still getting permits to play in round 4.[/quote]
Good morning Express and thank you for your constructive thoughtful input into the situation.
So you know Chad owes money? You know all the facts do you?
I'm sure if a ex Rose Park player did owe money and went elsewhere and followed the recommendations set down by all parties for a resolution, Rose Park would have no issue with him playing, why would you want to stop people from playing cricket?
I am also glad you can speak on behalf of the association and not want any Rose park players to play the association games.
Don't be so down, have a nice day and remember the sun comes up each day.[/quote]
Never said association dont want rose park players to play association games. Just that u guys wouldnt put ur hands up to play on sunday. As u all showed 4 days ago.[/quote]
how can you say that ?????? we at NEK did not put a side in on sunday ...we have players that play in the assoc side on a sunday . para vista also did not play sunday , but still have players in the assoc side. your comments look like you are purely having a go at rose park ? I am not sticking up for rose park by any means ....lol...(we have a hate , hate relationship lol) but ......if you say crap like that then you better look at all sides that didnt play sunday but play assoc games . now back to more important things....YES WE WANT AND NEED DUTCHY BACK IN CHURCHES....YES...HE WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE....YES ..AUTO IS STILL THE ALMIGHTY HANDSOME ONE.....YES ..BALDO IS STILL AN ANGRY RANGA.....YES....LET CHAD PLAY....see you on saturday auto, keep the drinks cold.[/quote]
This seriously isn't legit - he's a friggen Ranga, man I rated him til that comment. Im with D&S let Parish play - his involvement brings RP's average age down to 48yo.
I'm one of the many that obviously don't know the facts and have only read on as its a fairly slow day here at work but if he owes PH said amount then seriously why allow him to play? We all have to pay our yearly rego's why should this lad be any different?
Nobody has gotten a hand job in cargo shorts since 'Nam!
Lucky For Some wrote: This seriously isn't legit - he's a friggen Ranga, man I rated him til that comment. Im with D&S let Parish play - his involvement brings RP's average age down to 48yo.
I'm one of the many that obviously don't know the facts and have only read on as its a fairly slow day here at work but if he owes PH said amount then seriously why allow him to play? We all have to pay our yearly rego's why should this lad be any different?
Lucky For Some wrote: This seriously isn't legit - he's a friggen Ranga, man I rated him til that comment. Im with D&S let Parish play - his involvement brings RP's average age down to 48yo.
I'm one of the many that obviously don't know the facts and have only read on as its a fairly slow day here at work but if he owes PH said amount then seriously why allow him to play? We all have to pay our yearly rego's why should this lad be any different?
You're right you are so prob best to
Lol, providing the fact doesn't suit your argument? You blokes brought it to a public forum by the way. The last part of my comment stands, do you owe rego?? Do you pay your fees?? Why shouldn't he??
Nobody has gotten a hand job in cargo shorts since 'Nam!
Nobody is saying he shouldn't pay if he owes. He is disputing them saying he owes them money. Clearly both sides have their views on the matter hence the reason it is going to mediation. No player would go down that path without good reason.
Are you saying that if you wanted to change clubs and your old club asked you for hundreds of dollars that you believed you didn't owe you would just hand it over anyway?
fox wrote:Nobody is saying he shouldn't pay if he owes. He is disputing them saying he owes them money. Clearly both sides have their views on the matter hence the reason it is going to mediation. No player would go down that path without good reason.
Are you saying that if you wanted to change clubs and your old club asked you for hundreds of dollars that you believed you didn't owe you would just hand it over anyway?
That's not what I have said at all. But hold up it's common knowledge that you cant get cleared if there are outstanding monies owing to another club. This isn't a new rule (not in ours anyway).
Hypothetical question - answer if you want, If mediation falls over and Parish isn't cleared what happens to Rose Parks season? Shite would get hectic in the other forum if an unregistered player played half a season and the clearance never came through - is that fair??
And Moses, you didn't play for GG about a decade or so ago did you?
Nobody has gotten a hand job in cargo shorts since 'Nam!
