Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 10:51 amLol .. Thats better FC 
Dog_ger wrote:Women that complain too much...
Oh s***, here we go, hold on for the ride.
Page 3 of 1939
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 10:51 amPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:39 amOh s***, here we go, hold on for the ride.
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:44 amcennals05 wrote:Booney wrote:cennals05 wrote:People that say anythink and somethink.
LMFAO,a Centrals fan picking on pronounciation!
Add to my list people that can't spell pronunciation!! LOL
Did you arrive at that spelling or your own,or did you consult an online dictionary?
Either way........
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 12:20 pmBooney wrote:cennals05 wrote:Booney wrote:cennals05 wrote:People that say anythink and somethink.
LMFAO,a Centrals fan picking on pronounciation!
Add to my list people that can't spell pronunciation!! LOL
Did you arrive at that spelling or your own,or did you consult an online dictionary?
Either way........
I'm just one of those rare Central supporters that learnt how to read and write.
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 1:25 pmcennals05 wrote:Booney wrote:cennals05 wrote:Booney wrote:cennals05 wrote:People that say anythink and somethink.
LMFAO,a Centrals fan picking on pronounciation!
Add to my list people that can't spell pronunciation!! LOL
Did you arrive at that spelling or your own,or did you consult an online dictionary?
Either way........
I'm just one of those rare Central supporters that learnt how to read and write.
...and then jump on the biggest bandwagon since 1914.
regards,
REB
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:06 pmNew ODI Cricket rules.
But in particular, "Power Play".
Make a rule that sounds like the fielding team uses it to their advantage, using their POWER. When really, there was never a rule to say they CAN'T have only two men out for as long as they please.
Yet another rule to gear the game towards batting (As if it wasn't enough already).
But in particular, "Power Play".
Make a rule that sounds like the fielding team uses it to their advantage, using their POWER. When really, there was never a rule to say they CAN'T have only two men out for as long as they please.
Yet another rule to gear the game towards batting (As if it wasn't enough already).
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 2:53 pm24. People that use the term "Build a Bridge"
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 3:10 pmAnything that involves Gretel Killeen
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 3:17 pmTroyGFC wrote:Cyclists.
In particular, those cyclists who think that their bicycle is an amphibious urban assault vehicle, riding it at full speed on the sidewalk, darting on and off the road at will when the traffic suits them, riding full tilt across pedestrian crossings, furiously chasing any driver who gives a warning toot when they stray out of the bicycle lane, hurting the eyes with that pooncey lime-green and yellow f*cking spandex clothing, emblazoned with 2,512 different advertising slogans in a European language, descending en masse upon cafes where they stack their bikes four-deep across the walkway while they hog the outdoor dining areas, sipping their pooncey lattes, whining about inconsiderate drivers who don't concede to their right to the entire roadspace, the right which is God-given to them on account of their chosen mode of transport being allegedly "eco-friendly" - like visual pollution and urban clutter are any less evil.
Yeah, cyclists. I hate the f*ckers.
Mmm I feel one has been down to cafes down the bay!!!!
It's not just the bay..... Have a walk up rundle street on a saturday or sunday morning.
When i've seen there bikes all stacked up blocking the path, i've often thought how funny it would be to take one of their bikes and ride off on it.... then seeing them trying to run after me in those dicky little shoes they wear.
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:04 pmPseudo wrote:
Yeah, cyclists. I hate the f*ckers.
Bravo!!
Especially when they ride 2 astride - one in the bike lane, one outside. Cnuts.
And what about those tools riding those legs-in-the-air contraptions? I dont' know how to explain it to those who've not seen them, suffice to say it looks painful.
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:10 pmBad Adelaide drivers.
Commodores.
Bad Adelaide drivers driving Commodores. A lethal combination.
Commodores.
Bad Adelaide drivers driving Commodores. A lethal combination.
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:11 pmWell said Pseudo and zipzpa, I agree 100% with all of that.
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 12:49 pmzipzap wrote:Especially when they ride 2 astride - one in the bike lane, one outside.
I only recently found out that this is actually legal. I always figured that the "Share the Road" slogan worked both ways.
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:46 pmzipzap wrote:Bad Adelaide drivers driving Commodores. A lethal combination.
What about bad Adelaide Commodore drivers who, on weekends, ride two astride on "legs in the air contraptions" ignoring red lights and being general pains in the arse? They're out there.
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2006 4:56 pm Go Commodore !Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:03 amGilly wrote:zipzap wrote:Bad Adelaide drivers driving Commodores. A lethal combination.
What about bad Adelaide Commodore drivers who, on weekends, ride two astride on "legs in the air contraptions" ignoring red lights and being general pains in the arse? They're out there.
They're the worst!
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:58 am1. Driving down Anzac Highway, looking towards the bay and seeing highrise instead of sea.
2. People whinging about other SANFL clubs alledged over spending without really knowing the facts.
3. Port Power making a "financial loss" year after year, and therefore not giving any return to the owner of their AFL licence (the SANFL). If any other buisiness made a loss every year, they wouldn't be in buisiness anymore.
4. Sports administrators that change rules for the sake of change. If there is a genuine reason for change, then change, if not leave it alone. If it aint broke, don'y f@ck with it.
5. Anyone that would program a Grand Final the day before a working day.
2. People whinging about other SANFL clubs alledged over spending without really knowing the facts.
3. Port Power making a "financial loss" year after year, and therefore not giving any return to the owner of their AFL licence (the SANFL). If any other buisiness made a loss every year, they wouldn't be in buisiness anymore.
4. Sports administrators that change rules for the sake of change. If there is a genuine reason for change, then change, if not leave it alone. If it aint broke, don'y f@ck with it.
5. Anyone that would program a Grand Final the day before a working day.
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:10 pm- People who jump on the band wagon of a successful sporting team without seeing through the hard yartds of when they were crap. (i.e. All the roosters supporters who haven't been to a game in there life who all of a sudden jumped on when they started winning last year)
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:12 pmIan wrote:
3. Port Power making a "financial loss" year after year, and therefore not giving any return to the owner of their AFL licence (the SANFL). If any other buisiness made a loss every year, they wouldn't be in buisiness anymore.
How about just Port Power full stop.!!!!!!
Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:13 pmPeople who buy $7 worth of groceries in front of you with their ATM card.
People who take 15 minutes at an ATM.
(These came up today for me! lol)
People who take 15 minutes at an ATM.
(These came up today for me! lol)