HICKS DECISION

Anything!

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Jimmy_041 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:01 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:That's ok, though, they're not Muslims or fighting for them.


If Israel declared war on Australia (or vice versa) it wouldn't be OK, would it?
Some dual nationalities are still required to do national service
I still don't understand why we allow dual nationality
You're either in Team Australia or you're not.....
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14043
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 726 times
Been liked: 1080 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Lightning McQueen » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:17 pm

Ronnie wrote:Lucky us, the Hicks bandwagon just rolls on, soon no doubt to be financially enriched.

Any if anyone is in any doubt, any doubt, about the benefits of a good academic and moral education, just take a minute to take in the twin spectacles of old man Terry and David.

So if you were illegally detained for 7 years you'd just put it behind you and let it be?

I do not support his choices in life but it is a case that I have monitored since I first saw him on the TV after being captured, it freaked me out a bit as I remember him as a pretty quiet kid that kept to himself pretty much and never really upset anyone.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51381
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4348 times
Been liked: 7942 times

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby woodublieve12 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:19 pm

i have more sympathy for the 2 guys in bali then i do for hicks...
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17278
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3034 times
Been liked: 2406 times

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Lightning McQueen » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:20 pm

woodublieve12 wrote:i have more sympathy for the 2 guys in bali then i do for hicks...

Wow.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51381
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4348 times
Been liked: 7942 times

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Jimmy_041 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:23 pm

Lightning McQueen wrote:
Ronnie wrote:Lucky us, the Hicks bandwagon just rolls on, soon no doubt to be financially enriched.

Any if anyone is in any doubt, any doubt, about the benefits of a good academic and moral education, just take a minute to take in the twin spectacles of old man Terry and David.

So if you were illegally detained for 7 years you'd just put it behind you and let it be?

I do not support his choices in life but it is a case that I have monitored since I first saw him on the TV after being captured, it freaked me out a bit as I remember him as a pretty quiet kid that kept to himself pretty much and never really upset anyone.


Until he decided to get trained to kill people
He was lucky he wasn't shot or skun alive by the Afghans
No sympathy at all - he found the adventure he was seeking. Mission accomplished =;
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14043
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 726 times
Been liked: 1080 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby woodublieve12 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:25 pm

He was captured fighting for the Taliban (to kill his own), he is not innocent, he got off on a technicality, he is no different to the vermin going over to fight in Syria...

He deserves no benefits.
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17278
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3034 times
Been liked: 2406 times

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Lightning McQueen » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:30 pm

woodublieve12 wrote:He was captured fighting for the Taliban (to kill his own), he is not innocent, he got off on a technicality, he is no different to the vermin going over to fight in Syria...

He deserves no benefits.



How do you know that he knew that he was fighting against Aussies?
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51381
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4348 times
Been liked: 7942 times

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Dogwatcher » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:32 pm

Jimmy_041 wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:That's ok, though, they're not Muslims or fighting for them.


If Israel declared war on Australia (or vice versa) it wouldn't be OK, would it?


I was being sarcastic - referring to the double standard that seems to be supported by media coverage, or lack thereof, that it's okay for Australians to disappear and take part in the battle against Muslims, but not okay to fight for forces of Muslim origin.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Dogwatcher » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:33 pm

Lightning McQueen wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:He was captured fighting for the Taliban (to kill his own), he is not innocent, he got off on a technicality, he is no different to the vermin going over to fight in Syria...

He deserves no benefits.



How do you know that he knew that he was fighting against Aussies?


I don't think he actually did fire on or was involved in actions against American or Australian forces.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Q. » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:40 pm

woodublieve12 wrote:He was captured fighting for the Taliban (to kill his own), he is not innocent, he got off on a technicality, he is no different to the vermin going over to fight in Syria...

He deserves no benefits.


Why shouldn't people be able to fight for the Syrian Rebel movement. You realise it was being funded by the US and it's allies in the region.

As for Hicks, nothing justifies that period of detainment without charge and the torture received during incarceration.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2396 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Jimmy_041 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 2:59 pm

Q. wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:He was captured fighting for the Taliban (to kill his own), he is not innocent, he got off on a technicality, he is no different to the vermin going over to fight in Syria...

He deserves no benefits.

As for Hicks, nothing justifies that period of detainment without charge and the torture received during incarceration.


Correct. Should have let the Afghan Northern alliance sort him out when they captured him. Guantanamo Bay would have been a ski resort compared to what they would have done to him. Afghan women have a particular skill in making your skin crawl (literally)
User avatar
Jimmy_041
Coach
 
 
Posts: 14043
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:30 pm
Has liked: 726 times
Been liked: 1080 times
Grassroots Team: Prince Alfred OC

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby HH3 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:05 pm

Q. wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:He was captured fighting for the Taliban (to kill his own), he is not innocent, he got off on a technicality, he is no different to the vermin going over to fight in Syria...

He deserves no benefits.


Why shouldn't people be able to fight for the Syrian Rebel movement. You realise it was being funded by the US and it's allies in the region.

As for Hicks, nothing justifies that period of detainment without charge and the torture received during incarceration.


I think he means the ones going over to fight with the IS
I TOLD YOU SO

2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
User avatar
HH3
Coach
 
Posts: 11642
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:14 pm
Has liked: 3301 times
Been liked: 2433 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Q. » Thu Feb 19, 2015 3:33 pm

HH3 wrote:
Q. wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:He was captured fighting for the Taliban (to kill his own), he is not innocent, he got off on a technicality, he is no different to the vermin going over to fight in Syria...

He deserves no benefits.


Why shouldn't people be able to fight for the Syrian Rebel movement. You realise it was being funded by the US and it's allies in the region.

As for Hicks, nothing justifies that period of detainment without charge and the torture received during incarceration.


I think he means the ones going over to fight with the IS


ISIS was part of the Rebel movement and benefited from Western backing.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2396 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby shoe boy » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:01 pm

Q. wrote:
HH3 wrote:
Q. wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:He was captured fighting for the Taliban (to kill his own), he is not innocent, he got off on a technicality, he is no different to the vermin going over to fight in Syria...

He deserves no benefits.


Why shouldn't people be able to fight for the Syrian Rebel movement. You realise it was being funded by the US and it's allies in the region.

As for Hicks, nothing justifies that period of detainment without charge and the torture received during incarceration.


I think he means the ones going over to fight with the IS


[b]ISIS was part of the Rebel movement and benefited from Western backing.

[/b]
SPOT ON
User avatar
shoe boy
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4534
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 12:58 pm
Has liked: 488 times
Been liked: 209 times

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby woodublieve12 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:31 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:He was captured fighting for the Taliban (to kill his own), he is not innocent, he got off on a technicality, he is no different to the vermin going over to fight in Syria...

He deserves no benefits.



How do you know that he knew that he was fighting against Aussies?


I don't think he actually did fire on or was involved in actions against American or Australian forces.

Potentially he could have. That's why he was there...

Certainly wasn't there for a holiday, like he says...
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17278
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3034 times
Been liked: 2406 times

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Dogwatcher » Thu Feb 19, 2015 4:54 pm

woodublieve12 wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:
woodublieve12 wrote:He was captured fighting for the Taliban (to kill his own), he is not innocent, he got off on a technicality, he is no different to the vermin going over to fight in Syria...

He deserves no benefits.



How do you know that he knew that he was fighting against Aussies?


I don't think he actually did fire on or was involved in actions against American or Australian forces.

Potentially he could have. That's why he was there...

Certainly wasn't there for a holiday, like he says...


I agree, he wasn't there for a holiday.
But we should stick to the facts - he didn't fire on 'our boys'.
It doesn't change that he was there and that he shouldn't have been.
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Bully » Thu Feb 19, 2015 6:45 pm

hes guilty, and deserves nothing from any Australian !

on holidays hey champ......you don't fool me
Bully
Coach
 
Posts: 12496
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:28 am
Location: The best place on earth
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby Q. » Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:44 pm

Bully wrote:hes guilty , and deserves nothing from any Australian !

on holidays hey champ......you don't fool me


You must have missed the part where his conviction was overturned.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2396 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby dedja » Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:51 pm

Q. wrote:ISIS was part of the Rebel movement and benefited from Western backing.


Al-Qaeda says hello ...
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men
User avatar
dedja
Coach
 
 
Posts: 20417
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:10 pm
Has liked: 206 times
Been liked: 1024 times

Re: HICKS DECISION

Postby woodublieve12 » Thu Feb 19, 2015 10:59 pm

It's irrelevant who backed who (America backed them when the soviets were in that patch of the planet) regarding Hicks! you still have to pick sides and he picked the side which ended up shooting at and killing our own. You can say he never shot australians, that's irrelevant too. He would hve if he wasn't caught!!
Got off on a technicality!
I know he will but I wish he never gets a cent to tell his story...

Yep normal
Attachments
image.jpg
image.jpg (54.34 KiB) Viewed 5185 times
"Fellas, it’s OK to be in pain. It’s OK to hurt. It’s OK to be sad. It’s no longer OK to suffer in silence."
User avatar
woodublieve12
Coach
 
 
Posts: 17278
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:48 pm
Has liked: 3034 times
Been liked: 2406 times

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |