Re: Things that give you the sh1ts

His argument was he thought it was a feral cat, that's why he shot it.
Spargo wrote:His argument was he thought it was a feral cat, that's why he shot it.
Spargo wrote:His argument was he thought it was a feral cat, that's why he shot it.
Footy Chick wrote:If it was a person he shot in the head, he would've got time, because it would've been attempted murder.
Wedgie wrote:He was protecting his chooks. If the cat had killed one of the chooks would the cat owner have been threatened with jail time by the RSPCA?
Id rather die from a shot to the head than being mauled to death.
The only people cruel to animals in these sort of cases are the irresponssible morons that let their cats roam wherver they want to, preferably they'd be the animals that were put down.
HH3 wrote:If a dog got out and wandered onto your property, would you think it was acceptable to shoot it?
HH3 wrote:Wedgie wrote:He was protecting his chooks. If the cat had killed one of the chooks would the cat owner have been threatened with jail time by the RSPCA?
Id rather die from a shot to the head than being mauled to death.
The only people cruel to animals in these sort of cases are the irresponssible morons that let their cats roam wherver they want to, preferably they'd be the animals that were put down.
He's a pretty good shot if he got the cat in the head while it was attacking chooks.
I agree that people shouldn't let cats roam free, but cats are shifty little bastards and sometimes get out. If mine got past me and a neighbour shot him, I don't know what would happen.
I'm pretty sure the cat owner can be fined if their cat kills someones animals. How many chickens died?
Zartan wrote:Footy Chick wrote:If it was a person he shot in the head, he would've got time, because it would've been attempted murder.
You're comparing a cat with a person?
Footy Chick wrote:Spargo wrote:His argument was he thought it was a feral cat, that's why he shot it.
Feral or not, shooting anything in the head with an arrow is inhumane. That's why we have traps.
If it was a person he shot in the head, he would've got time, because it would've been attempted murder.
HH3 wrote:Wedgie wrote:He was protecting his chooks. If the cat had killed one of the chooks would the cat owner have been threatened with jail time by the RSPCA?
Id rather die from a shot to the head than being mauled to death.
The only people cruel to animals in these sort of cases are the irresponssible morons that let their cats roam wherver they want to, preferably they'd be the animals that were put down.
He's a pretty good shot if he got the cat in the head while it was attacking chooks.
I agree that people shouldn't let cats roam free, but cats are shifty little bastards and sometimes get out. If mine got past me and a neighbour shot him, I don't know what would happen.
I'm pretty sure the cat owner can be fined if their cat kills someones animals. How many chickens died?
cracka wrote:HH3 wrote:Wedgie wrote:He was protecting his chooks. If the cat had killed one of the chooks would the cat owner have been threatened with jail time by the RSPCA?
Id rather die from a shot to the head than being mauled to death.
The only people cruel to animals in these sort of cases are the irresponssible morons that let their cats roam wherver they want to, preferably they'd be the animals that were put down.
He's a pretty good shot if he got the cat in the head while it was attacking chooks.
I agree that people shouldn't let cats roam free, but cats are shifty little bastards and sometimes get out. If mine got past me and a neighbour shot him, I don't know what would happen.
I'm pretty sure the cat owner can be fined if their cat kills someones animals. How many chickens died?
He shot it 4 times
Wedgie wrote:Whats your husband's opinion on the matter HH3?
HH3 wrote:Looks like he was heaps aggressive with chickens hey.
HH3 wrote:Wedgie wrote:Whats your husband's opinion on the matter HH3?
He's my life partner until the government gets with the times.
Wedgie wrote:HH3 wrote:Looks like he was heaps aggressive with chickens hey.
Ive seen many pictures of lions with people looking harmless too, doesn't mean they're like that all of the time.
A good owner will kill any predator of his or her pets on their own property.
A bad owner will allow their pets on others property.
Its quite simple.
HH3 wrote:Wedgie wrote:HH3 wrote:Looks like he was heaps aggressive with chickens hey.
Ive seen many pictures of lions with people looking harmless too, doesn't mean they're like that all of the time.
A good owner will kill any predator of his or her pets on their own property.
A bad owner will allow their pets on others property.
Its quite simple.
No a good person will assess the situation and do what's best for everybody. A good person wouldn't shoot a cat with a bow and arrow 4 times. Think about it. How long would it take you to set and reset a bow and arrow 4 times. And wouldn't you think the threat the cat poses to your chickens is much less when it has one or two arrows in it?
The chicken story is a load of shit to try to get out of jail time.
He's a sadistic piece of shit.