MW wrote:can't believe i am engaging, but what % of vac and % of unvacc do those deaths equal?
Come on in
Depends on whether you consider 2 shot or 3 shot as being vaxxed
Hence why they are trying to change the definition to 3 shot
That day might be atypical but they dont mind using unusual stats to back up their narrative.
Not6ice how they try and deflect by talking about the ages
Have a listen to Chant in NSW
https://twitter.com/aussieval10/status/ ... 19456?s=21"A booster protects you. And I have made it very clear that for omicrom you need to consider 3 doses as being up to date and for some people 4.
So there is no doubt you need the 3 doses and anyone who is, um, feeling that 2 doses is enough, is incorrect
The science is very clear on that"
So, if I was to have my 1st 2 jabs in the coming weeks, I would not be protected?
The science is (apparently) very clear on that"
When caught out, it's the stupid that double down and that's what our health "professionals" are doing
I harp back to: