SA Footy

Q. wrote:

Apachebulldog wrote:This seems to be the norm by a lot of media outlets/interviewers pushing certain narratives and agendas cutting and splicing photo shopping missing out relevant facts etc etc

Oh boy. You realise that is Avi's entire Modus Operandi - he heavily edits and uses select footage for use on extreme right websites, like Tommy Robinson's, as a recruiting tool targeting adolescent males with poorly developed critical thinking skills and low emotional intelligence.

Thanks for proving my point though.

Booney wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Bum Crack wrote:Deactivated the Facebook account today. Over all the crap on there. This site will be my only source of bullshit from now on. Netflix, Prime, SAFooty and AFL will do me.

Yep, thinking the same, it's pure crap.

Me three, very much over it - except that I have a FB to look after (which, if I say so myself, appears to have to only good content on FB nowdays )

Purge some groups you follow, snooze some wankers who you thought were normal people, bit of a tidy up and you'll like it more.

Yes, there's a joke there.

am Bays wrote:F*** me, this thread makes me want to quit SAFooty.

To me this thread is about two blokes (Q and Apache) trying to prove who IS the biggest d!ck

The truth/balanced opinion is somewhere in the middle

am Bays wrote:F*** me, this thread makes me want to quit SAFooty.

To me this thread is about two blokes (Q and Apache) trying to prove who has the biggest d!cks

The truth/balanced opinion is somewhere in the middle

Booney wrote:

am Bays wrote:F*** me, this thread makes me want to quit SAFooty.

To me this thread is about two blokes (Q and Apache) trying to prove who has the biggest d!cks

The truth/balanced opinion is somewhere in the middle

I knew it would gather some traction, but not to this extent.

Bum Crack wrote:

Booney wrote:

am Bays wrote:F*** me, this thread makes me want to quit SAFooty.

To me this thread is about two blokes (Q and Apache) trying to prove who has the biggest d!cks

The truth/balanced opinion is somewhere in the middle

I knew it would gather some traction, but not to this extent.

It's almost getting as bad as the COVID thread

am Bays wrote:F*** me, this thread makes me want to quit SAFooty.

To me this thread is about two blokes (Q and Apache) trying to prove who has the biggest d!cks

am Bays wrote:F*** me, this thread makes me want to quit SAFooty.

To me this thread is about two blokes (Q and Apache) trying to prove who has the biggest d!cks

The truth/balanced opinion is somewhere in the middle

Magellan wrote:

am Bays wrote:F*** me, this thread makes me want to quit SAFooty.

To me this thread is about two blokes (Q and Apache) trying to prove who has the biggest d!cks

You mean they've both got more than one dick? Pull the other one.

Apachebulldog wrote:

Q. wrote:

Apachebulldog wrote:This seems to be the norm by a lot of media outlets/interviewers pushing certain narratives and agendas cutting and splicing photo shopping missing out relevant facts etc etc

Oh boy. You realise that is Avi's entire Modus Operandi - he heavily edits and uses select footage for use on extreme right websites, like Tommy Robinson's, as a recruiting tool targeting adolescent males with poorly developed critical thinking skills and low emotional intelligence.

Thanks for proving my point though.

Bravo Touche well done you also have proven my point as well LOL

This is something the MSM has been doing for a very long time.

So do you now acknowledge Jim Jeffries misrepresented and mislead his audience.

Do you acknowledge that he is scared to front up and explain why he did this.

Do you acknowledge that Jim Jeffries is a spineless gutless coward.

The evidence is at ya fingertips.

Cheerss

Oaksnaf wrote:

Q. wrote:

Oaksnaf wrote:No, there is no prize for being captain empathy, only wasted emotion.

Empathy has historically been viewed by men as a negative emotion. It was always viewed as a feminine trait, therefore negative, so fathers raised sons to be devoid of it. And the cycle repeats. It's a topic for another thread, but as fathers, it's up to us to break that cycle and play a key role in preventing male suicide, male on male violence, beating women with chopping boards, and in extremely worst case scenarios gunning down 51 people in a mosque.

Absolutely agree with the above. The above is what South Africa and many other countries must improve on.

In the specific situation that I made the comment in reference to, I believe the empathy is ill-directed, short lived and never acted upon to actually make change - so it is wasted emotion. Vandalising statues and posting on social media is not the answer.

am Bays wrote:F*** me, this thread makes me want to quit SAFooty.

To me this thread is about two blokes (Q and Apache) trying to prove who has the biggest d!cks

The truth/balanced opinion is somewhere in the middle

am Bays wrote:F*** me, this thread makes me want to quit SAFooty.

To me this thread is about two blokes (Q and Apache) trying to prove who has the biggest d!cks

The truth/balanced opinion is somewhere in the middle

Trader wrote:How's the outrage at Dan Andrews comments.
Seems the majority of South Australian's are part of this cancel culture of being outraged at anything that doesn't fit in our bubble!

What do they expect? Of course a premier is expected to think his own state is better than all others.

heater31 wrote:

Trader wrote:How's the outrage at Dan Andrews comments.
Seems the majority of South Australian's are part of this cancel culture of being outraged at anything that doesn't fit in our bubble!

What do they expect? Of course a premier is expected to think his own state is better than all others.

The Victorian premier's comments were taken out of context weren't they? He was promoting his own state in the first instance whilst also trying to deflect attention away from the failings of his government in other areas.

Trader wrote:

heater31 wrote:

Trader wrote:How's the outrage at Dan Andrews comments.
Seems the majority of South Australian's are part of this cancel culture of being outraged at anything that doesn't fit in our bubble!

What do they expect? Of course a premier is expected to think his own state is better than all others.

The Victorian premier's comments were taken out of context weren't they? He was promoting his own state in the first instance whilst also trying to deflect attention away from the failings of his government in other areas.

Agreed!

Yet the general south Australian population jumped straight to outrage and Facebook and twitter lit up with people calling him all sorts of names.

These days it seems everyone is just waiting for opportunities to absorb the role of the victim and be offended by anyone and anything.