SA Footy

Here's my crack at the 2013 ladder at end of minor round

1. Vikings - hard to see them dropping off
2. Flies - quality ins mixed with younger guys who have now been exposed to A grade footy should spell a good year
3. Shoes - always around the mark and have been slowly building for a while now. Mitton's last chance
4. Roos - gradual improvement over the last three years, should now expect to win most games. Won't do any damage in September
5. Cockledivers - improved a lot last year, should continue in 2013
6. Cobras - a bit like Porties, but not quite at the same level
7. Emus - on face value, not a lot of ins from last year. Would not have been happy missing finals last year
8. Falcons - unerachiever
9. Bombers - will fall far. Too many quality players gone. Will follow path of Flies and Emus from 2012
10. Hawks - splashing cash at kids for the second year in a row will see them improve
11. Saints - improving but still a long way off
12. Lions - hard to see them beating teams above them but will improve on last year and still be competitive for two or three quarters of most matches
12. Rams - better than last year but still a weekly struggle for Keamy, especially as injuries take hold and motivation falls away mid year
13. Sharks - same as the last eight or so years. Will probably show improvement during the opening month but drop away quickly after that

RFC 2010 wrote:Here's my crack at the 2013 ladder at end of minor round

1. Vikings - hard to see them dropping off
2. Flies - quality ins mixed with younger guys who have now been exposed to A grade footy should spell a good year
3. Shoes - always around the mark and have been slowly building for a while now. Mitton's last chance
4. Roos - gradual improvement over the last three years, should now expect to win most games. Won't do any damage in September
5. Cockledivers - improved a lot last year, should continue in 2013
6. Cobras - a bit like Porties, but not quite at the same level
7. Emus - on face value, not a lot of ins from last year. Would not have been happy missing finals last year
8. Falcons - unerachiever
9. Bombers - will fall far. Too many quality players gone. Will follow path of Flies and Emus from 2012
10. Hawks - splashing cash at kids for the second year in a row will see them improve
11. Saints - improving but still a long way off
12. Lions - hard to see them beating teams above them but will improve on last year and still be competitive for two or three quarters of most matches
12. Rams - better than last year but still a weekly struggle for Keamy, especially as injuries take hold and motivation falls away mid year
13. Sharks - same as the last eight or so years. Will probably show improvement during the opening month but drop away quickly after that

1. Vikings - Too strong all around the ground, have added playing depth in midfield and forward and only lost N.Eagletonp-clear favourites
2. Cockledivers-Big improvers and well coached, they will give Valley a run for their money
3. Roos - Will continue to be just about there, could easily make the GF if injuries are minimal
4. Wineflies - Some big ins, so would expect a strong showing from a respected team
5. Shoes - Around the mark, but not quite good enough
6. Emus - Will improve and can't confirm but hear they have recruited well
7. Falcons -Perennial underachievers. They have the cattle, but not the heart
8. Cove - Disappointing last year, can't see any real change this year
9. Bombers -Simply too many outs to be competitive
10. Saints - Could finish higher, look to be building a much better side
11. Hawks - Juniors will not make up for their lack of genuine talent at the club
12. Lions - Will battle hard, but just not enough talent
12. Rams - Nothing to excite their followers yet
13. Sharks - Nothing to see here

Think you will find Vikings have lost more than 1 player

Reynella lads certainly talking up their chances

Agree with most of these predictions but cant understand why people think Roos are around the mark. Miles off I reckon and not sure about their draw but if its harder than last year (which it should be) They will certainly get found out.

afc9798 wrote:

RFC 2010 wrote:Here's my crack at the 2013 ladder at end of minor round

1. Vikings - hard to see them dropping off
2. Flies - quality ins mixed with younger guys who have now been exposed to A grade footy should spell a good year
3. Shoes - always around the mark and have been slowly building for a while now. Mitton's last chance
4. Roos - gradual improvement over the last three years, should now expect to win most games. Won't do any damage in September
5. Cockledivers - improved a lot last year, should continue in 2013
6. Cobras - a bit like Porties, but not quite at the same level
7. Emus - on face value, not a lot of ins from last year. Would not have been happy missing finals last year
8. Falcons - unerachiever
9. Bombers - will fall far. Too many quality players gone. Will follow path of Flies and Emus from 2012
10. Hawks - splashing cash at kids for the second year in a row will see them improve
11. Saints - improving but still a long way off
12. Lions - hard to see them beating teams above them but will improve on last year and still be competitive for two or three quarters of most matches
12. Rams - better than last year but still a weekly struggle for Keamy, especially as injuries take hold and motivation falls away mid year
13. Sharks - same as the last eight or so years. Will probably show improvement during the opening month but drop away quickly after that

1. Vikings - Too strong all around the ground, have added playing depth in midfield and forward and only lost N.Eagletonp-clear favourites
2. Cockledivers-Big improvers and well coached, they will give Valley a run for their money
3. Roos - Will continue to be just about there, could easily make the GF if injuries are minimal
4. Wineflies - Some big ins, so would expect a strong showing from a respected team
5. Shoes - Around the mark, but not quite good enough
6. Emus - Will improve and can't confirm but hear they have recruited well
7. Falcons -Perennial underachievers. They have the cattle, but not the heart
8. Cove - Disappointing last year, can't see any real change this year
9. Bombers -Simply too many outs to be competitive
10. Saints - Could finish higher, look to be building a much better side
11. Hawks - Juniors will not make up for their lack of genuine talent at the club
12. Lions - Will battle hard, but just not enough talent
12. Rams - Nothing to excite their followers yet
13. Sharks - Nothing to see here

What happened to Towns were do you place them ??????
They may fly under every ones radar this season. Have lost a few players, but see good numbers on the track.

pantherman wrote:Agree with most of these predictions but cant understand why people think Roos are around the mark. Miles off I reckon and not sure about their draw but if its harder than last year (which it should be) They will certainly get found out.

Yeah agreed.
I think Reynella will do well as they play Christies, Edwardstown, MP and Noarlunga twice this year. They also play HV at home, Brighton at Home and Porties at Home. So you could pencil in at least 14 wins I reckon.
I don't think Brighton will fall that far from grace. A lot of outs but they have always been strong in B grade and juniors and from what's written on here the coach knows his stuff.
Cove will be up there again and with big Patty Gabb back in will help, but the loss of Luke Button and potentially Hare will be massive shoes to fill.
Surely Flaggies has to have a crack at the top 4 this year right??? Always do very well in preseason!
I see Craig Smith is returning to the Emu's anyone else returning? Beeching? Ewer?

What happened to Towns were do you place them ??????
They may fly under every ones radar this season. Have lost a few players, but see good numbers on the track.[/quote]

They are that insiginifcant that I completely forgot about them. Put them somewehere amongst the bottom 5

as you wood wrote:

afc9798 wrote:

RFC 2010 wrote:Here's my crack at the 2013 ladder at end of minor round

1. Vikings - hard to see them dropping off
2. Flies - quality ins mixed with younger guys who have now been exposed to A grade footy should spell a good year
3. Shoes - always around the mark and have been slowly building for a while now. Mitton's last chance
4. Roos - gradual improvement over the last three years, should now expect to win most games. Won't do any damage in September
5. Cockledivers - improved a lot last year, should continue in 2013
6. Cobras - a bit like Porties, but not quite at the same level
7. Emus - on face value, not a lot of ins from last year. Would not have been happy missing finals last year
8. Falcons - unerachiever
9. Bombers - will fall far. Too many quality players gone. Will follow path of Flies and Emus from 2012
10. Hawks - splashing cash at kids for the second year in a row will see them improve
11. Saints - improving but still a long way off
12. Lions - hard to see them beating teams above them but will improve on last year and still be competitive for two or three quarters of most matches
12. Rams - better than last year but still a weekly struggle for Keamy, especially as injuries take hold and motivation falls away mid year
13. Sharks - same as the last eight or so years. Will probably show improvement during the opening month but drop away quickly after that

1. Vikings - Too strong all around the ground, have added playing depth in midfield and forward and only lost N.Eagletonp-clear favourites
2. Cockledivers-Big improvers and well coached, they will give Valley a run for their money
3. Roos - Will continue to be just about there, could easily make the GF if injuries are minimal
4. Wineflies - Some big ins, so would expect a strong showing from a respected team
5. Shoes - Around the mark, but not quite good enough
6. Emus - Will improve and can't confirm but hear they have recruited well
7. Falcons -Perennial underachievers. They have the cattle, but not the heart
8. Cove - Disappointing last year, can't see any real change this year
9. Bombers -Simply too many outs to be competitive
10. Saints - Could finish higher, look to be building a much better side
11. Hawks - Juniors will not make up for their lack of genuine talent at the club
12. Lions - Will battle hard, but just not enough talent
12. Rams - Nothing to excite their followers yet
13. Sharks - Nothing to see here

What happened to Towns were do you place them ??????
They may fly under every ones radar this season. Have lost a few players, but see good numbers on the track.

Sorry, cut and pasted from RFC's list and didn't pick it up. I would put Townies between the Bombers and Saints.

Front & Centre wrote:Think you will find Vikings have lost more than 1 player

Reynella lads certainly talking up their chances

Only aware of N.Eagleton from HVFC at this stage, but they have also regained Sugg and Marks, plus added Gordon. Not sure if there's any truth to the McNamara thing, but either way I'd suggest Valley are equal to or stronger than last year. Will be interested to see what the final Reynella list looks like.

Is big Trev going around again at Morphies or has he gone back to Vic?

afc9798

1. Vikings - Too strong all around the ground, have added playing depth in midfield and forward and only lost N.Eagletonp-clear favourites
2. Cockledivers-Big improvers and well coached, they will give Valley a run for their money
3. Roos - Will continue to be just about there, could easily make the GF if injuries are minimal
4. Wineflies - Some big ins, so would expect a strong showing from a respected team
5. Shoes - Around the mark, but not quite good enough
6. Emus - Will improve and can't confirm but hear they have recruited well
7. Falcons -Perennial underachievers. They have the cattle, but not the heart
8. Cove - Disappointing last year, can't see any real change this year9. Bombers -Simply too many outs to be competitive
10. Saints - Could finish higher, look to be building a much better side
11. Hawks - Juniors will not make up for their lack of genuine talent at the club
12. Lions - Will battle hard, but just not enough talent
12. Rams - Nothing to excite their followers yet
13. Sharks - Nothing to see here

Bit harsh afc9798 given the list Cove had in 2012 they did very well to get to where they finished, losing 3 talls before the season started had to hurt. Only lost to the shoes as they ran out of talls and Ramsey had his face shattered all in all a good year. 2013 might just surprise a few..

RFC 2010 wrote:Here's my crack at the 2013 ladder at end of minor round

1. Vikings - hard to see them dropping off
2. Flies - quality ins mixed with younger guys who have now been exposed to A grade footy should spell a good year
3. Shoes - always around the mark and have been slowly building for a while now. Mitton's last chance
4. Roos - gradual improvement over the last three years, should now expect to win most games. Won't do any damage in September
5. Cockledivers - improved a lot last year, should continue in 2013
6. Cobras - a bit like Porties, but not quite at the same level
7. Emus - on face value, not a lot of ins from last year. Would not have been happy missing finals last year
8. Falcons - unerachiever
9. Bombers - will fall far. Too many quality players gone. Will follow path of Flies and Emus from 2012
10. Hawks - splashing cash at kids for the second year in a row will see them improve
11. Saints - improving but still a long way off
12. Lions - hard to see them beating teams above them but will improve on last year and still be competitive for two or three quarters of most matches
12. Rams - better than last year but still a weekly struggle for Keamy, especially as injuries take hold and motivation falls away mid year
13. Sharks - same as the last eight or so years. Will probably show improvement during the opening month but drop away quickly after that

This is similar to my thoughts except the roos won't finish top 4 with the tougher draw I still believe the bombers are a good chance to fill that 4th spot.. Flagies to miss out on the eight and reckon you have edwardstown in the right spot..

RFC 2010 wrote:Here's my crack at the 2013 ladder at end of minor round

1. Vikings - hard to see them dropping off
2. Flies - quality ins mixed with younger guys who have now been exposed to A grade footy should spell a good year
3. Shoes - always around the mark and have been slowly building for a while now. Mitton's last chance
4. Roos - gradual improvement over the last three years, should now expect to win most games. Won't do any damage in September
5. Cockledivers - improved a lot last year, should continue in 2013
6. Cobras - a bit like Porties, but not quite at the same level
7. Emus - on face value, not a lot of ins from last year. Would not have been happy missing finals last year
8. Falcons - unerachiever
9. Bombers - will fall far. Too many quality players gone. Will follow path of Flies and Emus from 2012
10. Hawks - splashing cash at kids for the second year in a row will see them improve
11. Saints - improving but still a long way off
12. Lions - hard to see them beating teams above them but will improve on last year and still be competitive for two or three quarters of most matches
12. Rams - better than last year but still a weekly struggle for Keamy, especially as injuries take hold and motivation falls away mid year
13. Sharks - same as the last eight or so years. Will probably show improvement during the opening month but drop away quickly after that

Hard to disagree with most of that but can't have Brighton missing the eight! They have lost some real quality which may have them struggle to beat the top couple but i think they will still handle the majority of teams easily. Top 8 certainties and i still think 3rd-5th. Happy to be proven wrong

Ill have a crack.

1. Valley - won last year with a few missing. Cant be any worse i wouldnt think.
2. Noarlunga - The minor round specialists. Will win enough to finish high up again.
3. Pt Noarl - I reckon they have built something last year. Expect to be a real contender.
4. Reynella - Their kids will benefit hugely from their finish to last year. Add a couple of ins and they should be back up the ladder.
5. M Vale - A soft draw and some inclusions on and off field will see big improvement.
6. Cove - Could be anywhere between 3rd and 6th. One of those sides that seems to drop a game they shouldnt now and again.
7. Brighton - Obviously lost a few, but good depth. Their Tough draw will be their nemesis.
8. M Parks - Improved a lot last year, but now everyone is aware of what they can do. Wont win as many against the top sides this year.
9. F Hill - The whole club is doing extremely well, but just lack that polish at the top level. Similar to last year.
10. Edwardstown - Honestly dont know! Does anyone!
11. Christies - Expecting a bit more improvement under cratey. Still a long way to go.
12. Lonsdale - Just better than the 3 below.
13. Hackham - Recruited some guys that can kick and catch. They are only young though, so will take some time.
14. Marion - Continuing the long road ahead. Hopefully a bit more improvement.
15. Aldinga - I hope im wrong, but im not hearing great things. Some more cricket scores coming.

Dutchy wrote:Is big Trev going around again at Morphies or has he gone back to Vic?

Yes, Trev will be playing this year.

vics01 wrote:afc9798

1. Vikings - Too strong all around the ground, have added playing depth in midfield and forward and only lost N.Eagletonp-clear favourites
2. Cockledivers-Big improvers and well coached, they will give Valley a run for their money
3. Roos - Will continue to be just about there, could easily make the GF if injuries are minimal
4. Wineflies - Some big ins, so would expect a strong showing from a respected team
5. Shoes - Around the mark, but not quite good enough
6. Emus - Will improve and can't confirm but hear they have recruited well
7. Falcons -Perennial underachievers. They have the cattle, but not the heart
8. Cove - Disappointing last year, can't see any real change this year9. Bombers -Simply too many outs to be competitive
10. Saints - Could finish higher, look to be building a much better side
11. Hawks - Juniors will not make up for their lack of genuine talent at the club
12. Lions - Will battle hard, but just not enough talent
12. Rams - Nothing to excite their followers yet
13. Sharks - Nothing to see here

Bit harsh afc9798 given the list Cove had in 2012 they did very well to get to where they finished, losing 3 talls before the season started had to hurt. Only lost to the shoes as they ran out of talls and Ramsey had his face shattered all in all a good year. 2013 might just surprise a few..

To qualify my comments, I meant disappointing compared to what they had been. Totally agree they did well with what they had at their disposal, but certainly went backwards from previous seasons where they looked a lot more dangerous.

Would be very surprised if Flaggies finished as high as predicted in some of these ladders. Hearing rumblings of a mass exodus of some real quality. Do have proven depth through the B grade, which may just keep them in the hunt for a 8 - 12 finishing position. Unfortunately appears to be a backward step after a few years of matching it with the real powerhouses of the competition.

Specky McGee wrote:Would be very surprised if Flaggies finished as high as predicted in some of these ladders. Hearing rumblings of a mass exodus of some real quality. Do have proven depth through the B grade, which may just keep them in the hunt for a 8 - 12 finishing position. Unfortunately appears to be a backward step after a few years of matching it with the real powerhouses of the competition.

This i would agree with Flaggies showed a lot of promise in 2011, then they needed to continue in 2012 but only to go backwards.
They have lost a lot and gain only a few, but led to believe that purse strings were closed tight(as they have a healthy bank account) and the Coach should have bowed out at the end of last season.

But things could change after the bonding weekend (at Loxton)with minimal footballers attending, only 1/3 of its Senior's A & B attending. great start for a team that wants to improve

I to don't rated Flaggies in the top 8 more like in the the group of 11 to 15.

as you wood wrote:

Specky McGee wrote:Would be very surprised if Flaggies finished as high as predicted in some of these ladders. Hearing rumblings of a mass exodus of some real quality. Do have proven depth through the B grade, which may just keep them in the hunt for a 8 - 12 finishing position. Unfortunately appears to be a backward step after a few years of matching it with the real powerhouses of the competition.

This i would agree with Flaggies showed a lot of promise in 2011, then they needed to continue in 2012 but only to go backwards.
They have lost a lot and gain only a few, but led to believe that purse strings were closed tight(as they have a healthy bank account) and the Coach should have bowed out at the end of last season.

But things could change after the bonding weekend (at Loxton)with minimal footballers attending, only 1/3 of its Senior's A & B attending. great start for a team that wants to improve

I to don't rated Flaggies in the top 8 more like in the the group of 11 to 15.[/quote

Mass exodus ???

Who has left? I know of smith SANFL and Shane Heinrich to Peake. Do agree tho loss of a couple of key players could send flaggies spiralling down the ladder.

barry footynut wrote:

as you wood wrote:

Specky McGee wrote:Would be very surprised if Flaggies finished as high as predicted in some of these ladders. Hearing rumblings of a mass exodus of some real quality. Do have proven depth through the B grade, which may just keep them in the hunt for a 8 - 12 finishing position. Unfortunately appears to be a backward step after a few years of matching it with the real powerhouses of the competition.

This i would agree with Flaggies showed a lot of promise in 2011, then they needed to continue in 2012 but only to go backwards.
They have lost a lot and gain only a few, but led to believe that purse strings were closed tight(as they have a healthy bank account) and the Coach should have bowed out at the end of last season.

But things could change after the bonding weekend (at Loxton)with minimal footballers attending, only 1/3 of its Senior's A & B attending. great start for a team that wants to improve

I to don't rated Flaggies in the top 8 more like in the the group of 11 to 15.[/quote

Mass exodus ???

Who has left? I know of smith SANFL and Shane Heinrich to Peake. Do agree tho loss of a couple of key players could send flaggies spiralling down the ladder.

Heinrich as a 'Key Player' is a bit of a stretch...