Re: Southern Football League
Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2020 4:07 pm
how the hell does Flagstaff Hill get to host finals?
woodublieve12 wrote:how the hell does Flagstaff Hill get to host finals?
shoe boy wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:how the hell does Flagstaff Hill get to host finals?
shoe boy wrote:Jim05 wrote:I said at the time that there was plenty to play out in this one and not to believe everything you hear.
I know what played out also and DUTCHY would know!
Without the full outcome if it is a slap on the wrist the decision is very poor and inconsistent .
woodublieve12 wrote:shoe boy wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:how the hell does Flagstaff Hill get to host finals?
Put the ordinary oval aside, surely the league could have read the room and realised this wasn't a smart idea???
Are there many flagstaff people on sfl board?
King wrote:shoe boy wrote:Jim05 wrote:I said at the time that there was plenty to play out in this one and not to believe everything you hear.
I know what played out also and DUTCHY would know!
Without the full outcome if it is a slap on the wrist the decision is very poor and inconsistent .
SB, if you know what played out please tell us all. Especially how you know it all, given you weren’t there. Otherwise admit you’re full of sh*t.
shoe boy wrote:King wrote:shoe boy wrote:Jim05 wrote:I said at the time that there was plenty to play out in this one and not to believe everything you hear.
I know what played out also and DUTCHY would know!
Without the full outcome if it is a slap on the wrist the decision is very poor and inconsistent .
SB, if you know what played out please tell us all. Especially how you know it all, given you weren’t there. Otherwise admit you’re full of sh*t.
Your club was found GUILTY of racial abuse !
Your angst should be directed at your club or those involved and am sure you are aware off?
King wrote:SB, my point is that you maintain you know what played out and yet you were not there. Therefore you are relying on second, third, fourth hand information and reading published articles which contained numerous errors of fact. The SFL investigation was able to decipher the fact from the fiction and delivered a considered, honest and reasonable decision. Classic case of don’t believe everything you read or hear! Also don’t judge a whole club on the actions of a couple of idiots.
King wrote:SB, my point is that you maintain you know what played out and yet you were not there. Therefore you are relying on second, third, fourth hand information and reading published articles which contained numerous errors of fact. The SFL investigation was able to decipher the fact from the fiction and delivered a considered, honest and reasonable decision. Classic case of don’t believe everything you read or hear! Also don’t judge a whole club on the actions of a couple of idiots.
The Bedge wrote:King wrote:SB, my point is that you maintain you know what played out and yet you were not there. Therefore you are relying on second, third, fourth hand information and reading published articles which contained numerous errors of fact. The SFL investigation was able to decipher the fact from the fiction and delivered a considered, honest and reasonable decision. Classic case of don’t believe everything you read or hear! Also don’t judge a whole club on the actions of a couple of idiots.
This could be the biggest load of shit I've ever read on this site.. and I've posted enough shit in my time myself!
I'd be embarrassed to be involved in your club right now.
hollywood7477 wrote:St Peters have a reputation as their supporters did it last year against an Indigenous Henley footballer in the Div1R GF. Supporters were ejected from the ground.
KegLeg wrote:I can’t comment on the off field stuff but on field are anyone going to get close to flaggies? Five in a row looks likely
meanderman wrote:Which club was the second off field incident? The way this has NOT been handled is disgraceful
shoe boy wrote:meanderman wrote:Which club was the second off field incident? The way this has NOT been handled is disgraceful
Same game.