by Roo Ted » Wed Jul 09, 2014 2:49 pm
by Luke15 » Wed Jul 09, 2014 3:09 pm
Roo Ted wrote:At the weekend, 5 clubs were unable to field an U/14 team (1 third), 5 clubs were unable to field an U/15 team (1 third) and 3 clubs unable to field an U/18 team in their own right (1 fifth).
That is seriously broken.
by afc9798 » Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:12 pm
Roo Ted wrote:At the weekend, 5 clubs were unable to field an U/14 team (1 third), 5 clubs were unable to field an U/15 team (1 third) and 3 clubs unable to field an U/18 team in their own right (1 fifth).
That is seriously broken.
by Courtney Fish » Thu Jul 10, 2014 12:29 am
Luke15 wrote:Roo Ted wrote:At the weekend, 5 clubs were unable to field an U/14 team (1 third), 5 clubs were unable to field an U/15 team (1 third) and 3 clubs unable to field an U/18 team in their own right (1 fifth).
That is seriously broken.
So why keep pushing the issue to have 5 sides play on a Saturday. I think we should be grateful that most clubs are even fielding junior sides. Let's be honest it's not just the SFL that is broken I'd say majority of metropolitan football in SA is broken. Time the SFL & SAAFL got together and nutted something out.
by Numbers » Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:54 am
by shoe boy » Thu Jul 10, 2014 9:25 am
shoe boy wrote:mots02 wrote:shoe boy wrote:" IT ISNT BROKEN"
One of the most bizarre comments heard this year?
without the benefit of context, this is one of the most bizzare posts this year!
what or who isnt broken?!
The last word spoken b4 over riding the clubs of SFL.
by afc9798 » Thu Jul 10, 2014 10:16 am
Courtney Fish wrote:
Maybe these kids might find their way to nearby clubs struggling for numbers. They will be lost to the clubs eventually when there is no room in the Seniors for most of them. I'd say every club works hard to attract more juniors. There is enough kids playing in this league for most clubs to fill all grades except 18's which is obviously a bit thin on numbers. But most kids are at the bigger clubs with 2 or 3 sides per age group. And letting a club have 3 under 8's sides only increases the problem in the future.
by Esteban Vihaio » Thu Jul 10, 2014 9:18 pm
Numbers wrote:The SFL is not the AFL with TV rights to worry about that need 18 teams!
Why don't we look to move on without the struggling clubs!
A league with 12 strong clubs is better than a league with 15 where 3 really struggle!
by Luke15 » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:57 am
Esteban Vihaio wrote:Numbers wrote:The SFL is not the AFL with TV rights to worry about that need 18 teams!
Why don't we look to move on without the struggling clubs!
A league with 12 strong clubs is better than a league with 15 where 3 really struggle!
by afc9798 » Fri Jul 11, 2014 12:01 pm
by Dutchy » Fri Jul 11, 2014 1:09 pm
by afc9798 » Fri Jul 11, 2014 2:17 pm
Dutchy wrote:Good chance for Flaggies to bounce back and show they are good enough with another key game, last week was not the Flaggies team that Ive seen play competitive footy all year. Look forward to a good day at the footy tomorrow.
by Keyser Soze » Fri Jul 11, 2014 6:00 pm
Esteban Vihaio wrote:Numbers wrote:The SFL is not the AFL with TV rights to worry about that need 18 teams!
Why don't we look to move on without the struggling clubs!
A league with 12 strong clubs is better than a league with 15 where 3 really struggle!
How do you define struggling clubs?
- Clubs without a A grade finals appearance in over a decade? Aldinga and Hackham?
- Clubs that are not currently fielding all five Saturday sides independently? lonsdale, MVP, Noarlunga, Aldinga? marion, Edwardstown?
- Clubs that don't consistently field under 14's and under 16's on Saturdays? MVP, Edwardstown, Lonsdale, Marion.
- Clubs that don't consistently field under 14's and under 16's? Edwardstown, Marion, Lonsdale
Many ways to judge struggling clubs. Which one is it?
by marbles » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:42 pm
Luke15 wrote:Esteban Vihaio wrote:Numbers wrote:The SFL is not the AFL with TV rights to worry about that need 18 teams!
Why don't we look to move on without the struggling clubs!
A league with 12 strong clubs is better than a league with 15 where 3 really struggle!
How do you define struggling clubs?
- Clubs without a A grade finals appearance in over a decade? Aldinga and Hackham?
- Clubs that are not currently fielding all five Saturday sides independently? lonsdale, MVP, Noarlunga, Aldinga? marion, Edwardstown?
- Clubs that don't consistently field under 14's and under 16's on Saturdays? MVP, Edwardstown, Lonsdale, Marion.
- Clubs that don't consistently field under 14's and under 16's? Edwardstown, Marion, Lonsdale
Many ways to judge struggling clubs. Which one is it?[/quote
well there are 3 clubs listed in all of your categories so that says to.me they are really struggling. In my opinion if you cannot fill under 14s and 16s on a regular basis then you are gonna really struggle in the future
by Dutchy » Fri Jul 11, 2014 10:43 pm
by Bluedemon » Sat Jul 12, 2014 9:34 pm
by Numbers » Sun Jul 13, 2014 8:54 am
by the big bang » Sun Jul 13, 2014 9:33 am
Numbers wrote:Dutchy
What was the result of the FH v MV B grade game yesterday?
All other results are on sporting pulse except that grade!
by King » Sun Jul 13, 2014 11:46 am
Numbers wrote:Dutchy
What was the result of the FH v MV B grade game yesterday?
All other results are on sporting pulse except that grade!
by Oldman Munga » Sun Jul 13, 2014 3:51 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |