NEWS FLASH-SFL

A forum dedicated to the Southern Football League!

Re: NEWS FLASH-SFL

Postby AFLflyer » Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:00 pm

knees peterson wrote:
who know ZC maybe they would have, or HV or Cove might have thats for sure!


Didnt cove get knocked out by porties

so why would they care


they supported reynellas challenge - so who knows they may have, but unlikely I know - HV had a reason - REVENGE!
User avatar
AFLflyer
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 7:36 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 3 times

Re: NEWS FLASH-SFL

Postby THE MOLE » Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:08 pm

Valleysvirgin wrote:The story is true...and how delicious seeing as it was the Bombers who waved the rule book at the Valley last year in the 18's regarding a scenario that was nowhere near as serious as the facts are in this case resulting in 21 boys being let down at Taylors Rd.

...come to think of it, haven't they been serial squealers on a number of relatively minor rule infringements involving several SFL clubs over the last few years? If you want to live by the sword then you must be prepared to die by the sword.

Let's see if the SFL will stand by their precedent from last season (and the HFL's from last season also with the Blackwood B's). Do they want to upset one club or fifteen??

LOL....how'd you like to be the Bombers Club Secretary at the moment? A great cure for loneliness I would suggest.


I think happy valley would of.........
THE MOLE
Under 18s
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:14 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: NEWS FLASH-SFL

Postby BringBackDBush » Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:34 am

This is an administrative technicality. He’s not an over aged player playing in an under aged comp.
He’s wasn’t even coming from one SFL club to another SFL club.
I’m sure all concerned must have known one thing and that is he’s played quite a few games for Brighton, he’s not some end of season ring in.
The only reason Reynella would have put in a protest was in the hope of overturning the last game and giving them a shot at the GF. But surely they should have realized that if the error was that dire then every club in the league would have grounds to protest and the whole minor round premiership table would have to be re-written with Brighton at the bottom.
I’ll say again this is an administrative technicality, if Brighton is found to be fully or partially in the wrong surely the penalty would range from a reprimand to a fine.
Guys, this ain’t grand theft auto this ain’t the Dianna conspiracy.
Reynella administration you were wrong your reaction and expectations were not proportional to the crime. I think the emotion of missing out on the chance at Morphets, a chance they were expected to have from day one of this years comp has caused them to do something very embarrassing .
I can’t speak for every body but if I were in Reynella’s position I would NOT have bothered and I’ll say again.
This is an administrative technicality and Reynella you were wrong.
PG 4 PM
User avatar
BringBackDBush
Member
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 6:07 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Previous

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  SFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |