by wristwatcher » Wed Sep 09, 2015 3:05 am
by Grahaml » Wed Sep 09, 2015 3:46 am
wristwatcher wrote:bennymacca wrote:wristwatcher wrote:Great catch Maxi. Made that look a lot easier than it was. Very cool take as it was travelling.
I know he has played a few tests already, but is he a chance to come back in at number 6 at all?
No chance at all. Is a World X1 short form player but not even in our test second 11. Maybe as a professional 12th man
How bad is Wades keeping. I figured it had improved as he is playing for his country again but his hands are still not technically sound. Horrid miss stumping of Morgan, brutally bad
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Sep 09, 2015 10:42 am
Grahaml wrote:
Maxwell is absolutely a chance to play more tests. Averages north or 40 at first class level and I think that will only improve as he works a few things out. Handy with the ball and in the field, he could be at least as valuable as Symonds was. I distinctly remember people saying the same things about him back in the day and he proved them to be well off the mark. The thing that Maxwell has in his favour is he is a very clever cricketer. He's constantly trying to read the opponents to outwit them. It's how he gets most of his wickets. However, he seems to get caught too much in trying to out think bowlers when he's batting in the longer forms rather than just playing the ball on its merits. Certainly a better batting option at 6 than anyone named Marsh.
by wristwatcher » Wed Sep 09, 2015 11:03 am
Grahaml wrote:wristwatcher wrote:bennymacca wrote:wristwatcher wrote:Great catch Maxi. Made that look a lot easier than it was. Very cool take as it was travelling.
I know he has played a few tests already, but is he a chance to come back in at number 6 at all?
No chance at all. Is a World X1 short form player but not even in our test second 11. Maybe as a professional 12th man
How bad is Wades keeping. I figured it had improved as he is playing for his country again but his hands are still not technically sound. Horrid miss stumping of Morgan, brutally bad
Maxwell is absolutely a chance to play more tests. Averages north or 40 at first class level and I think that will only improve as he works a few things out. Handy with the ball and in the field, he could be at least as valuable as Symonds was. I distinctly remember people saying the same things about him back in the day and he proved them to be well off the mark. The thing that Maxwell has in his favour is he is a very clever cricketer. He's constantly trying to read the opponents to outwit them. It's how he gets most of his wickets. However, he seems to get caught too much in trying to out think bowlers when he's batting in the longer forms rather than just playing the ball on its merits. Certainly a better batting option at 6 than anyone named Marsh.
by bennymacca » Wed Sep 09, 2015 11:05 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Grahaml wrote:
Maxwell is absolutely a chance to play more tests. Averages north or 40 at first class level and I think that will only improve as he works a few things out. Handy with the ball and in the field, he could be at least as valuable as Symonds was. I distinctly remember people saying the same things about him back in the day and he proved them to be well off the mark. The thing that Maxwell has in his favour is he is a very clever cricketer. He's constantly trying to read the opponents to outwit them. It's how he gets most of his wickets. However, he seems to get caught too much in trying to out think bowlers when he's batting in the longer forms rather than just playing the ball on its merits. Certainly a better batting option at 6 than anyone named Marsh.
Unfortunately an average of over 40 isn't as good as it sounds given the flat aussie decks and the often poor attacks getting around at shield level due to half of the country's best bowlers are generally injured.
We should get a north island and a south island team from New Zealand to enter our shield comp to vary up the conditions for when we travel.........................and to get the Redbacks off the bottom of the table.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Sep 09, 2015 11:16 am
bennymacca wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Grahaml wrote:
Maxwell is absolutely a chance to play more tests. Averages north or 40 at first class level and I think that will only improve as he works a few things out. Handy with the ball and in the field, he could be at least as valuable as Symonds was. I distinctly remember people saying the same things about him back in the day and he proved them to be well off the mark. The thing that Maxwell has in his favour is he is a very clever cricketer. He's constantly trying to read the opponents to outwit them. It's how he gets most of his wickets. However, he seems to get caught too much in trying to out think bowlers when he's batting in the longer forms rather than just playing the ball on its merits. Certainly a better batting option at 6 than anyone named Marsh.
Unfortunately an average of over 40 isn't as good as it sounds given the flat aussie decks and the often poor attacks getting around at shield level due to half of the country's best bowlers are generally injured.
We should get a north island and a south island team from New Zealand to enter our shield comp to vary up the conditions for when we travel.........................and to get the Redbacks off the bottom of the table.
Well then why doesn't every shield batsman average 40?
by bennymacca » Wed Sep 09, 2015 11:22 am
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Sep 09, 2015 12:25 pm
bennymacca wrote:Hehe fair.
I reckon on spinning decks they could play maxwell ahead of marsh, this Bangladesh squad announcement is probably the most interesting in memory, I can't remember a time when it was so wide open for spots
by Grahaml » Wed Sep 09, 2015 1:07 pm
wristwatcher wrote:
A chance way down the road. He currently averages 13 in test cricket.
With the loss of both openers and Wato for Bangladesh and their dry dusty wickets he would have to be more chance there than anywhere to get a game but I can't see him getting a game until he had a genuine break out shield season with the bat.
This is a bloke who left a ball and it hit middle and leg. I think sometimes people can get their forms of the game a little muddled. I'd rather see a genuine batsmen in there.
by RB » Wed Sep 09, 2015 2:15 pm
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 09, 2015 2:39 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by bennymacca » Wed Sep 09, 2015 2:47 pm
Zartan wrote:Maxwell could potentially become another Warner type person at test cricket.
FWIW I cant stand the bloke and wouldn't want him in the side, but you cant deny he has an uncanny ability to whack a ball lol, and can be a dangerous batsman.
by wristwatcher » Wed Sep 09, 2015 5:17 pm
Grahaml wrote:wristwatcher wrote:
A chance way down the road. He currently averages 13 in test cricket.
With the loss of both openers and Wato for Bangladesh and their dry dusty wickets he would have to be more chance there than anywhere to get a game but I can't see him getting a game until he had a genuine break out shield season with the bat.
This is a bloke who left a ball and it hit middle and leg. I think sometimes people can get their forms of the game a little muddled. I'd rather see a genuine batsmen in there.
Averages 13 in 3 tests. Hardly a big sample.
The highlighted section though is comedy gold. That was a T20 game. And you think others get their forms of the game muddled up?
by The Bedge » Wed Sep 09, 2015 5:21 pm
wristwatcher wrote:Is it a tough concept for you to deal with that to wear the baggy green you need to earn it in whites and not from pyjama wearing shits and giggles or even one day cricket.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by wristwatcher » Wed Sep 09, 2015 6:16 pm
Zartan wrote:wristwatcher wrote:Is it a tough concept for you to deal with that to wear the baggy green you need to earn it in whites and not from pyjama wearing shits and giggles or even one day cricket.
That concept disappeared a long time ago I'm afraid..
by bennymacca » Wed Sep 09, 2015 6:44 pm
wristwatcher wrote:Grahaml wrote:wristwatcher wrote:
A chance way down the road. He currently averages 13 in test cricket.
With the loss of both openers and Wato for Bangladesh and their dry dusty wickets he would have to be more chance there than anywhere to get a game but I can't see him getting a game until he had a genuine break out shield season with the bat.
This is a bloke who left a ball and it hit middle and leg. I think sometimes people can get their forms of the game a little muddled. I'd rather see a genuine batsmen in there.
Averages 13 in 3 tests. Hardly a big sample.
The highlighted section though is comedy gold. That was a T20 game. And you think others get their forms of the game muddled up?
He has been total puss in tests that's why it's not a bigger sample.
I am quite clear it was a 20/20 game. It's just the worst leave in the history of cricket. The ability to leave the ball is a required skill in Test cricket. Does it make sense now chuckles. You want a guy picked for Test cricket based on one day form.
Is it a tough concept for you to deal with that to wear the baggy green you need to earn it in whites and not from pyjama wearing shits and giggles or even one day cricket.
by wristwatcher » Wed Sep 09, 2015 7:29 pm
bennymacca wrote:wristwatcher wrote:Grahaml wrote:wristwatcher wrote:
A chance way down the road. He currently averages 13 in test cricket.
With the loss of both openers and Wato for Bangladesh and their dry dusty wickets he would have to be more chance there than anywhere to get a game but I can't see him getting a game until he had a genuine break out shield season with the bat.
This is a bloke who left a ball and it hit middle and leg. I think sometimes people can get their forms of the game a little muddled. I'd rather see a genuine batsmen in there.
Averages 13 in 3 tests. Hardly a big sample.
The highlighted section though is comedy gold. That was a T20 game. And you think others get their forms of the game muddled up?
He has been total puss in tests that's why it's not a bigger sample.
I am quite clear it was a 20/20 game. It's just the worst leave in the history of cricket. The ability to leave the ball is a required skill in Test cricket. Does it make sense now chuckles. You want a guy picked for Test cricket based on one day form.
Is it a tough concept for you to deal with that to wear the baggy green you need to earn it in whites and not from pyjama wearing shits and giggles or even one day cricket.
Warner smith Starc Lyon all say hi
by bennymacca » Wed Sep 09, 2015 10:34 pm
by Gozu » Thu Sep 10, 2015 12:35 am
bennymacca wrote:totes amazeballs post bae, that is like super kewl
by tigerpie » Thu Sep 10, 2015 12:42 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |