Re: Pakis v Aussies
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:21 pm
whufc wrote:Pakis 1/1
Johnson with an absolute sand shoe crusher, plumb lbw
I read on the commentary that Hafeez reviewed it! WADH, was there any doubt with it at all?
whufc wrote:Pakis 1/1
Johnson with an absolute sand shoe crusher, plumb lbw
The Dark Knight wrote:whufc wrote:Pakis 1/1
Johnson with an absolute sand shoe crusher, plumb lbw
I read on the commentary that Hafeez reviewed it! WADH, was there any doubt with it at all?
whufc wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:whufc wrote:Pakis 1/1
Johnson with an absolute sand shoe crusher, plumb lbw
I read on the commentary that Hafeez reviewed it! WADH, was there any doubt with it at all?
Yep waster of review,
Umpires had the finger up before the guys even appealed
He reviews after discussion with other batsmen
Was hitting middle 10cm up the stumps
stan wrote:Like the look of this aussie side. Off to a good start as well.
bennymacca wrote:must admit i havent seen much of okeefe, but he looks pretty decent. reckon he would be an ok one day bowler too - why did we persist with doherty?
locky801 wrote:2/47 after 25 overs, exciting stuff
locky801 wrote:2/47 after 23 overs, exciting stuff
bennymacca wrote:locky801 wrote:2/47 after 25 overs, exciting stuff
I think it has been great. Pakis has to dig in after losing two early ones and they did that.
whufc wrote:Rogers drops Azhar after a set plan creates a chance
Was a toughish chance admittedly
whufc wrote:locky801 wrote:2/47 after 23 overs, exciting stuff
Yeah very slow, I'm fairness they were 2/10 and in fairness all 5 of our bowlers have bowled very accurate
Commentators mentioned the last two times the pakis have played at this ground they have won the toss, batted and then got bowled out for 90 and 167 in their first innings
locky801 wrote:whufc wrote:locky801 wrote:2/47 after 23 overs, exciting stuff
Yeah very slow, I'm fairness they were 2/10 and in fairness all 5 of our bowlers have bowled very accurate
Commentators mentioned the last two times the pakis have played at this ground they have won the toss, batted and then got bowled out for 90 and 167 in their first innings
Have to keep the board ticking over, even with just singles, putting up the shutters is fine when you lose a couple of quick ones but if then you lose 3 or 4 more you can find yourself 6 for not very many which has obviously happened here before with them, 3 runs in nearly 10 overs in ridiculous
whufc wrote:What injury does James Pattinson have at the moment?
Would be in my best 11 if fit
whufc wrote:What injury does James Pattinson have at the moment?
Would be in my best 11 if fit