by The Dark Knight » Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:36 pm
by The Dark Knight » Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:39 pm
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Warney is having a lend saying 250 plus on this deck is good. We'll get rolled inside 4 days.
by PatowalongaPirate » Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:39 pm
Jim05 wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:Warney is having a lend saying 250 plus on this deck is good. We'll get rolled inside 4 days.
Depends how long India want to bat for
by Brodlach » Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:47 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:Warney is having a lend saying 250 plus on this deck is good. We'll get rolled inside 4 days.
We'll need to bowl exceptionally and the Indian top order will have to fall like Ninepins for us to have a genuine chance of winning. Looking forward to seeing what day two brings us.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by stan » Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:29 pm
by Sharksta » Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:30 pm
by The Dark Knight » Fri Feb 24, 2017 5:49 am
by Bombers4EVA » Fri Feb 24, 2017 8:33 am
The Dark Knight wrote:Starc is a genuine number 8 and is a better allrounder than Mitch Marsh.
50 for Starc as he smacks another boundary. 53 from 47, Australia 9/250
by carey » Fri Feb 24, 2017 8:39 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Jim05 wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:Warney is having a lend saying 250 plus on this deck is good. We'll get rolled inside 4 days.
Depends how long India want to bat for
O'Keefe could be the Ace in the deck here. This pitch is bullshit and if he can get the ball to grip and bounce/turn on the right handers then a bag is to be had.
by Brodlach » Fri Feb 24, 2017 8:47 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by stan » Fri Feb 24, 2017 8:50 am
by The Dark Knight » Fri Feb 24, 2017 8:57 am
stan wrote:
by Bombers4EVA » Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:01 am
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:22 am
Bombers4EVA wrote:I reckon if you ask either of the Marsh brother's to show you their knees. You would find callouses on both knees from sucking a lot of "Chickens" to get their place on the team.
by bennymacca » Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:23 am
by Bombers4EVA » Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:26 am
bennymacca wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag43uW4AOFc
by stan » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:03 am
by Bombers4EVA » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:05 am
stan wrote:To be honest 256 is more than I thought we would make in any innings. Some good slogging by Starc at the end.
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
by Jim05 » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:12 am
Bombers4EVA wrote:stan wrote:To be honest 256 is more than I thought we would make in any innings. Some good slogging by Starc at the end.
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
Almost the way you should approach spin. Yeah it was a handy innings. I think we really need to "choke" India when we bowl and not give them a chance to build partnerships. Because as we have seen. They can make a lot of runs very quickly. I'm quite nervous about Lyon's chances of taking lots of wickets. But O'Keefe has the chances with his variations. How many variations does Agar have in his spin bowling?
by bennymacca » Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:14 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |