SA Footy

Conway should be batting at 5

Dizzy has no idea!

Harry in the runs again.
Good to see as he’s copped his fair share of criticism over time

Fifty to everyones favourite Harry

Minimum Chips wrote:Wow - Conway at 9. We are crap!
Any chance of Gillespie taking some responsibility with selections? Sadly, when you have board members who are delusional by saying the cricket department are doing a great job, no wonder we keep getting these performances.
We pretty much need everything going our way to be at least half competitive. Being sent in on 2 greentops this week hasn't helped either.

Yes we are short of cattle in this state but geez some of our dismissals are bush league stuff. Who is teaching these blokes how to bat and why have our decent players regressed so much?
Hunt was on the verge of a test squad berth 12 months ago and has completely forgotten how to bat, McSweeney has been fast tracked by CA as a genuine prospect for national honours and now he is struggling. The whole program in this state is broken

amber_fluid wrote:Harry in the runs again.
Good to see as he’s copped his fair share of criticism over time

Will get shut down for this but actually think he is one of our most consistent bats.

If Carey comes back in the side whether that be shield or one dayers i would still find room for Nielson as a batter.

Dumb to take the single on the last ball of the 49th over

231 not enough but might not be a complete walloping

whufc wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:Harry in the runs again.
Good to see as he’s copped his fair share of criticism over time

Will get shut down for this but actually think he is one of our most consistent bats.

If Carey comes back in the side whether that be shield or one dayers i would still find room for Nielson as a batter.

Would definitely retain his spot, at least values his wicket (I know I have been critical of him in the past too but respect his form lately)

Armchair expert wrote:231 not enough but might not be a complete walloping

From 6/131 to 9/231 is good effort. About 40 - 60 short but better than all out 150!

whufc wrote:

amber_fluid wrote:Harry in the runs again.
Good to see as he’s copped his fair share of criticism over time

Will get shut down for this but actually think he is one of our most consistent bats.

If Carey comes back in the side whether that be shield or one dayers i would still find room for Nielson as a batter.

said that during his last match, has been very consistent and pulled us out the poo on more than one occasion

0/66

Brodlach wrote:Isn’t Jake injured?

Obviously not, Hunt gets one in the face and goes off injured and Lehmann comes on as sub fielder as the 12th man.

25 overs done and Vics are 1/134

SACK DIZZY FFS

Nah surely not

GET THE FIELD UP FFS

Armchair expert wrote:Nah surely not

nah no chance

locky801 wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:Nah surely not

nah no chance

Again the bowlers did well but batters failed again

amber_fluid wrote:

locky801 wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:Nah surely not

nah no chance

Again the bowlers did well but batters failed again

seems a common and regular statement doesnt it

Minimum Chips wrote:Ridiculous non-selection. Besides Tim Nielsen (even though they claim he isn't one but we all know he controls everything), who are the selectors?

Not playing today so might be injured?

I'm hearing Carey is playing for the Deadbacks this week. Not sure about Travis though.