Re: AdFL Tribunal Listing
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2022 4:59 pm
2 weeks for attempted striking??
Fools Gold wrote:2 weeks for attempted striking??
MoP wrote:No surprise to see Haysman (SPOC) get 4 weeks. Interesting, though, to see that Wisman (Glenunga) got suspended when he didn't even give away a free kick, but Gibson (SPOC) got sent off for his tackle, but didn't get anything.
More confusion/mixed messaging from HQ. Based on what I saw, I think Wisman deserved his suspension, but thought Gibson may have got one, too.
The Bedge wrote:MoP wrote:No surprise to see Haysman (SPOC) get 4 weeks. Interesting, though, to see that Wisman (Glenunga) got suspended when he didn't even give away a free kick, but Gibson (SPOC) got sent off for his tackle, but didn't get anything.
More confusion/mixed messaging from HQ. Based on what I saw, I think Wisman deserved his suspension, but thought Gibson may have got one, too.
HQ have repeatedly said they don’t sift through the 45 match videos a week.
My understanding is SPOC complained about Wisemen. Did Glenunga complain about Gibson ? If they did and it is as you say he might’ve got one.
I don’t think there’s any confusion at all except your understanding of how incidents are brought to Leagues attention because if they are, like or not, HQ are normnally onto it.
What time is the tackle you are talkng about ?
scottroo wrote:Is whelan related to the coach?
Trader wrote:Fair effort to go from 7 weeks to none!
Well done to the Woody South defence team!
I wonder if the league will apologise to the lad for putting his name out there for a week as guilty to a fairly serious charge.
bloods08 wrote:Trader wrote:Fair effort to go from 7 weeks to none!
Well done to the Woody South defence team!
I wonder if the league will apologise to the lad for putting his name out there for a week as guilty to a fairly serious charge.
Looks like the appeal was dismissed to me.
The Bedge wrote:bloods08 wrote:Trader wrote:Fair effort to go from 7 weeks to none!
Well done to the Woody South defence team!
I wonder if the league will apologise to the lad for putting his name out there for a week as guilty to a fairly serious charge.
Looks like the appeal was dismissed to me.
That's how I read it?
The Bedge wrote:Tribunal is like the Casino - house always wins.
Trader wrote:The Bedge wrote:Tribunal is like the Casino - house always wins.
Haha, thanks lads, appreciate the clarification.
Surprised he only got a suspended week added. Basically a free appeal!