Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2021 3:12 pmMr Beefy wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Bad timing. It would've been better being introduced a few weeks ago IMO. That way clubs could've built that into their selection criteria when interviewing players or finding out if their existing players would need to be replaced.
It hasnt actually been introduced.... yet
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2021 4:33 pmPosted: Thu Dec 09, 2021 10:20 pmharambe1 wrote:is the league going to assume responsibility for any side effects? or are they going to normalise myocarditis and pericarditis in healthy young athletes?
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 1:23 amHector wrote:harambe1 wrote:is the league going to assume responsibility for any side effects? or are they going to normalise myocarditis and pericarditis in healthy young athletes?
I'm sure you have evidence to back this up?
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 7:26 amHector wrote:harambe1 wrote:is the league going to assume responsibility for any side effects? or are they going to normalise myocarditis and pericarditis in healthy young athletes?
I'm sure you have evidence to back this up?
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 9:27 amPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 9:57 ammarbles wrote:With 90.6% of south australians now having their 1st dose jab already there really wont be a major absence of players, and those without jabs will already be at present facing major scrutiny to get the jab from employers and soon no proof of jab then no entry anywhere so the antivaxxers will inevitably have to join the majority or go live off the grid in the flinders ranges
of course the league will say double jab essential. as will gyms and all other sports.
not that i agree with be forced with getting pumped with experimental vaccines and hoping they have no side effects, but thats another story not suited for footy forums.
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 10:12 amHector wrote:harambe1 wrote:is the league going to assume responsibility for any side effects? or are they going to normalise myocarditis and pericarditis in healthy young athletes?
I'm sure you have evidence to back this up?
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 4:54 pmPosted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 8:50 pmFooty Chick wrote:You can all keep your cool Covid stories out of this forum
If you want to play conspiracy theorist, post here http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=43003
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 9:44 pmdaysofourlives wrote:Footy Chick wrote:You can all keep your cool Covid stories out of this forum
If you want to play conspiracy theorist, post here http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=43003
Its completely relevant, more censorship from the most important issue we will ever face in our life times, just because somewhere dares not agree with you
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 10:20 pmdaysofourlives wrote:Footy Chick wrote:You can all keep your cool Covid stories out of this forum
If you want to play conspiracy theorist, post here http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=43003
Its completely relevant, more censorship from the most important issue we will ever face in our life times, just because somewhere dares not agree with you
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2021 10:30 pmThey are not his theories... Ctrl + C, Ctrl + PFooty Chick wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Footy Chick wrote:You can all keep your cool Covid stories out of this forum
If you want to play conspiracy theorist, post here http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=43003
Its completely relevant, more censorship from the most important issue we will ever face in our life times, just because somewhere dares not agree with you
IT ONLY NEEDS TO BE IN ONE FORUM. KEEP YOUR THEORIES IN THE GENERAL FORUM OR BYE BYE.
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2021 5:23 pmHe is printing them off too???Mr Beefy wrote:They are not his theories... Ctrl + C, Ctrl + PFooty Chick wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Footy Chick wrote:You can all keep your cool Covid stories out of this forum
If you want to play conspiracy theorist, post here http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=43003
Its completely relevant, more censorship from the most important issue we will ever face in our life times, just because somewhere dares not agree with you
IT ONLY NEEDS TO BE IN ONE FORUM. KEEP YOUR THEORIES IN THE GENERAL FORUM OR BYE BYE.
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2021 3:39 pmMr Beefy wrote:They are not his theories... Ctrl + C, Ctrl + PFooty Chick wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Footy Chick wrote:You can all keep your cool Covid stories out of this forum
If you want to play conspiracy theorist, post here http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=43003
Its completely relevant, more censorship from the most important issue we will ever face in our life times, just because somewhere dares not agree with you
IT ONLY NEEDS TO BE IN ONE FORUM. KEEP YOUR THEORIES IN THE GENERAL FORUM OR BYE BYE.
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2021 1:11 pmdaysofourlives wrote:Footy Chick wrote:You can all keep your cool Covid stories out of this forum
If you want to play conspiracy theorist, post here http://safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=43003
Its completely relevant, more censorship from the most important issue we will ever face in our life times, just because somewhere dares not agree with you
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2021 2:07 pmPosted: Tue Dec 14, 2021 7:17 pmDutchy wrote:Adelaide Footy League boss John Kernahan says the competition will implement a no jab, no play Covid-19 vaccine policy if directed to by the SANFL and SA Health officials.
The competition already has a no jab, no entry policy in place for league offices as per duty of care for its staff but is waiting on guidance regarding players and club staff.
Kernahan said he would be happy to work alongside the SANFL regarding a policy.
“If the last two seasons have taught us anything with regards to Covid it is to not plan too far ahead but this is one issue we are happy to collaborate with the SANFL on,” Kernahan said.
“Generally speaking, we are pro-choice but in parallel with that, if there are consequences of choosing not to be vaccinated and it includes not playing footy, then so be it.”
Kernahan, on behalf of the Adelaide Footy League, sent an update to all clubs on Friday, in it stating “we are at least open to it (a policy) being mandated in the near future”.
However, he has also expressed the competition’s frustration at the decision being left to local organisations.
“It is unfortunate something like this is being left to the SANFL rather than it being a universal directive from the State Government or SA Health that all can refer to whether that be education, industry or recreation, otherwise we’re all marching to a different beat,” Kernahan said.
“It seems to me the South Australian community at least by majority is screaming out for some direction even if only due to 80 per cent of the population being vaccinated by choice in any event.
“The clubs are very aware this isn’t necessarily an agenda item we can solve on our own and the league is only a microcosm of the wider community.”
Reigning division one premiers Prince Alfred Old Collegians said it would accept any directive from the league.
“The club will wait for direction from the ADFL, which we understand is dealing with the SANFL and other competitions,” co-chairman Tim Hall said.
“We are looking forward to completing the full season without disruption through Covid.”
Reds star player and competition best and fairest Jack Trengove was also eager to get a full season under his belt.
“I just hope we can get back to playing footy seasons that are as normal as possible again,” he said.
“Getting through a full season uninterrupted is the ultimate goal, and doing whatever is required to ensure that happens safely is what myself and the whole football club will be doing.”
An imminent decision and announcement by the SANFL is expected – with guidelines for local community competitions expected to be included.
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2021 9:49 am