SA Footy

Zartan wrote:

Booney wrote:Nothing of the sort has been said, it was someone speculating what might be said.

Yeah I realise that, but it's a fair speculation given everytime something is reported the Rosewater incident always seems to find it's way into the article - look at the Modbury report the other day, right at the top a link to the Rosewater story

norm11 wrote:Is this from Saint Paul's game ?? 3 or 4 weeks ago ??

Brodlach wrote:

Zartan wrote:

Booney wrote:Nothing of the sort has been said, it was someone speculating what might be said.

Yeah I realise that, but it's a fair speculation given everytime something is reported the Rosewater incident always seems to find it's way into the article - look at the Modbury report the other day, right at the top a link to the Rosewater story

That is exactly why I thought it would come up

Robb_Stark wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Robb_Stark wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:Is this official?

least north pines still have that million dollar upgrade coming

Already complete mate

i have the headline North Pines kicked out of the league but from the ashes paralowie merge

carey wrote:Well 7 of us playing behind Mitchell Park anyway..........

morell wrote:I must be confused. I swear the last game Para Hills played before this year was a winning GF in Div 5?

morell wrote:The reigning Div 5 Premiers far too good today. Some real strength around the ball and class up forward. Was all a bit matey with Lynt, Smithy, Bangers and Nusk before the game. Glad a bit of mongrel crept in.

Was fun to play on carey for a bit! Old fella is moving well. The Real Number 3 was rubbish in the Bs and rubbish on the sidelines but was funny to see him waddling around nonetheless. Hope your injury isn't too bad OKC!

The banter from the numpties in front of the club was in all honesty pretty shite - I expected some zingers! Was glad to purposefully move into their pocket to take the licks and make their day. Clearly the "type this up morell" pundits struggle with reading comprehension - the result only confirmed what I've been hammering about you twits.

morell wrote:Right right I am confused. My bad. Its hard when teams win flags and then fold for a year,

carey wrote:

morell wrote:The reigning Div 5 Premiers far too good today. Some real strength around the ball and class up forward. Was all a bit matey with Lynt, Smithy, Bangers and Nusk before the game. Glad a bit of mongrel crept in.

Was fun to play on carey for a bit! Old fella is moving well. The Real Number 3 was rubbish in the Bs and rubbish on the sidelines but was funny to see him waddling around nonetheless. Hope your injury isn't too bad OKC!

The banter from the numpties in front of the club was in all honesty pretty shite - I expected some zingers! Was glad to purposefully move into their pocket to take the licks and make their day. Clearly the "type this up morell" pundits struggle with reading comprehension - the result only confirmed what I've been hammering about you twits.

Likewise Morell playing on you from the first bounce was something I didn't expect to be honest, although having a bit of a chat was good. I can assure all the doubters on here he is actually a nice bloke! Thought you went well when you went on to Hanson by the way.

I'm not sure the result itself constitutes the Div 5 premiership side talk nor what you've been banging on about for 6 months tho. Facts are it was a very evenly fought contest. A simply stat of the scoring shots tells you that, Para Hills had 20 Mitchell Park had 18, Mitchell Park also kicked about 3 out of bounds on the full. You also seem to forget at one stage either late in the first in early in the second (I cant quite recall the timing) the score board read Para Hills 2.4 to Mitchel Park 1.7, Turn that in to 7.1 or even 6.2 and its a total different story especially had Nat kicked them early ones and starts the Brett Lee chain saw celebrations that seems to get you blokes up and about. Para Hills also basically full strength (1 Out) and Mitchell Park have 5-6 to come back in, I'm sure it will be totally different at your ground.

I thought you had 2 clear stand outs on the day #5 Trav Hyde was awesome in the middle as was #4 Walczak across half back other mentions must go to Bradford and yourself for the job on Hanson. Also thought your runner was outstanding! what an angry little man

The niggle was good, Nothing over the top just 2 evenly matched sides trying to get an edge. Mitchell Park have played a physical style of game for as long I can remember and yesterday was no different and I thought we matched you guys in that area.

I must also mention the 2 umpires who I thought umpired the game very well.

cracka wrote:

morell wrote:Right right I am confused. My bad. Its hard when teams win flags and then fold for a year,

Could even be (dare I say it) wrong.

morell wrote:

cracka wrote:

morell wrote:Right right I am confused. My bad. Its hard when teams win flags and then fold for a year,

Could even be (dare I say it) wrong.

It was a play on words - purposefully wrong. Meant to be funny but clearly I need to work on my material.