Page 1 of 1

Rule 37.5

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 12:12 pm
by jo172
Over the last lustrum we seem to have an annual argument regarding clubs exercising their right under rule 37.5 and refuse their right of promotion after making a Grand Final. We have seen the flow on effects from club's doing this causing chaos on the rest of the League.

My question is, with Salisbury's decision (which I agree with Shrek, it's piss weak) should the Clubs consider amending Rule 37.5 to the effect that A Grade Grand Finalists cannot refuse promotion (I can understand that there may be some cause for leeway where a C Grade wins A7)

I personally can't see what negative effect an amendment of this type would have.

Thoughts?

Re: Rule 37.5

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 6:33 pm
by woodublieve12
Should never ever be an option.

Re: Rule 37.5

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 8:23 pm
by Q.
I guess the rule is there if a grand finalist experiences a significant player retention issue following the season and the club feels it may not be competitive in their current division, let alone the division above.

Re: Rule 37.5

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 8:30 pm
by wonder_kid
Which salisbury clearly are not losing 15 a graders ! B grade went undefeated lol absolute joke really!

Re: Rule 37.5

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 8:34 pm
by woodublieve12
whats the point of having a promotion or relegation system if clubs are not going to adhere to it?

Re: Rule 37.5

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2015 8:46 pm
by heater31
If I was a Salisbury board member I would be very nervous at walking into a hostile AGM the next time it's held....

Re: Rule 37.5

PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2015 12:13 am
by Look Good In Leather
heater31 wrote:If I was a Salisbury board member I would be very nervous at walking into a hostile AGM the next time it's held....


After winning an undefeated premiership?

Perhaps if they do not go undefeated...