Clubs in strife

Adelaide Footy League Talk

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby marbles » Fri Apr 11, 2014 6:26 pm

how much does the league charge a club to play a team in a division??
User avatar
marbles
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4139
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 5:27 pm
Location: Titan
Has liked: 276 times
Been liked: 259 times

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Look Good In Leather » Fri Apr 11, 2014 6:28 pm

jo172 wrote:
Look Good In Leather wrote:
jo172 wrote:
Look Good In Leather wrote:A-graders from Div1-3 are 3 points each
B-grades from Div1-3 are 2 points each as are A-Graders from Div4 down

Unless they recruit spuds, they can bring in minimal players.

Effectively the points system only lets you tinker around the edges


Wrong.

B Grade players are worth nothing (apart from SANFL reserves, VFL reserves etc)


Not according to the CFL regulations.


http://www.saafl.asn.au/uploads/Pages/p ... _copy1.pdf


That is from 2012

see page 46 http://www.sacommunityfootball.com.au/f ... h_2014.pdf
User avatar
Look Good In Leather
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2070
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 9:50 am
Has liked: 150 times
Been liked: 284 times
Grassroots Team: Christies Beach

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Q. » Fri Apr 11, 2014 7:52 pm

morell wrote:
Yank Man wrote:
morell wrote:
Bombers4EVA wrote:Get rid of the points system and paying players and all will be good.
Those two things are definitely factors, but they 2/10s of the overall picture.

Player apathy
Work/Sport Quandary
Competition from other sports
Time poor lifestyles
Geography
Demographics
Club density

etc

It's a complicated story.



A-get used the the points system, the majority are in favour and it's here to stay. Yes I believe there should be more flexibility with it, maybe that will come in time.
B-get used to player payments it's here for good, times changed years ago. Smart clubs work a way to compete without throwing big $$$$ around. Be it right or wrong it ain't changing. :)
I've racked my feeble mind on how to get rid of player payments (for lower divisions in particular) as I think it's having a massive derogatory impact on our sport and league. The only solutions I've ever thought of either require a massive shift in the mindset of the league, sport and its players, or a massive influx of resources to monitor and police it...or support from the state and feds:

If player x is getting income from playing sport, that should be taxed, unless I am mistaken.

Therefore, technically, players that receive said income could be audited and fined by the ATO.

If this happened enough times eventually individuals and clubs would have to begin declaring their payments.

If that then happened for long enough, then there would be records available for, say, an office of Recreation and Sport to begin putting a stamp on it, and possibly, providing some of those records to approved governing bodies, such as the SAAFL.

From there, they could put in policies and regulation to control it.

Pipe dream and perhaps draconian.


Can we then claim for expenses like equipment, medical, insurances etc?
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2396 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Cohiba » Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:47 pm

Q. wrote:
morell wrote:
Yank Man wrote:
morell wrote:
Player apathy
Work/Sport Quandary
Competition from other sports
Time poor lifestyles
Geography
Demographics
Club density

etc

It's a complicated story.



A-get used the the points system, the majority are in favour and it's here to stay. Yes I believe there should be more flexibility with it, maybe that will come in time.
B-get used to player payments it's here for good, times changed years ago. Smart clubs work a way to compete without throwing big $$$$ around. Be it right or wrong it ain't changing. :)
I've racked my feeble mind on how to get rid of player payments (for lower divisions in particular) as I think it's having a massive derogatory impact on our sport and league. The only solutions I've ever thought of either require a massive shift in the mindset of the league, sport and its players, or a massive influx of resources to monitor and police it...or support from the state and feds:

If player x is getting income from playing sport, that should be taxed, unless I am mistaken.

Therefore, technically, players that receive said income could be audited and fined by the ATO.

If this happened enough times eventually individuals and clubs would have to begin declaring their payments.

If that then happened for long enough, then there would be records available for, say, an office of Recreation and Sport to begin putting a stamp on it, and possibly, providing some of those records to approved governing bodies, such as the SAAFL.

From there, they could put in policies and regulation to control it.

Pipe dream and perhaps draconian.


Can we then claim for expenses like equipment, medical, insurances etc?


Of course.......also Work Cover for injuries sustained at the "office"..... :roll: :)
User avatar
Cohiba
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:53 am
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 41 times

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby easy TIGA » Fri Apr 11, 2014 11:27 pm

Cohiba wrote:
easy TIGA wrote:Has the points system had a negative effect on grass roots football? Is it more of a coincidence that when this came in, it made college sides stronger and the less aussie rules populated area weaker?


Is that why you "deserted" a sinking ship....or was it just for the money........ :roll:


While it's none of your business. I gave the chics my all when I was there and family was my reasoning as to why I left to a club I live 2 minutes away from. I wasn't blaming points system on kilburns down fall. Simply asking what people thought. But thanks for the personal attack.
easy TIGA
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:09 pm
Has liked: 34 times
Been liked: 35 times

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Cohiba » Sat Apr 12, 2014 1:54 am

easy TIGA wrote:
Cohiba wrote:
easy TIGA wrote:Has the points system had a negative effect on grass roots football? Is it more of a coincidence that when this came in, it made college sides stronger and the less aussie rules populated area weaker?


Is that why you "deserted" a sinking ship....or was it just for the money........ :roll:


While it's none of your business. I gave the chics my all when I was there and family was my reasoning as to why I left to a club I live 2 minutes away from. I wasn't blaming points system on kilburns down fall. Simply asking what people thought. But thanks for the personal attack.


PG bailed me up on my post and copped for it being a smart alec remark.... it was crass and offer my apologies......and have removed the post.
User avatar
Cohiba
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:53 am
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 41 times

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Tony Clifton » Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:53 am

Look Good In Leather wrote:
jo172 wrote:
Look Good In Leather wrote:
In 2013 Pulteney had 534 boys enrolled
CBC 1135
Trinity 1842
Blackfriars 1005
Mercedes 591

Whilst it is not instant, that is going to make a huge difference to the average district club that may have 100-200 players in their junior ranks in a season.

In 5-10 years time, these will be power clubs unless they don't capitalise on it. Likewise clubs like Henley, TTG, Modbury, PNU and Golden Grove should be very strong.

How many of those kids play football though? Those schools would only have a handful of football teams. Certainly less than a mid-sized football club.

Plus any of those kids who are decent at football would be playing junior club footy for someone else. Not all of them gravitate to their old scholars team.

They've had kids at their school for umpteen years and aren't powerhouses.
This is Tony Clifton! A name to respect! A name to fear!
User avatar
Tony Clifton
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2674
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:00 pm
Has liked: 1462 times
Been liked: 244 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Yank Man » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:47 am

Mr Beefy wrote:Incorrect 2 and 0 and 2



Div 2 reserves players attract 2 points each under CFL regs for 2013. ;)
Yank Man
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2868
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 7:15 am
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 317 times
Grassroots Team: Edwardstown

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby FOURTH ESTATE » Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:52 am

If they leave the league and if these country league apply the pts to those players. Country clubs not in favour of this one from memory.
2017, 2019 & 2020 PREMIERS
RICHMOND, RICHMOND, RICHMOND.


Let that be a lesson to you Sturt. You don't beat Glenelg 3 times in a row in Grand Finals and get away with it.
User avatar
FOURTH ESTATE
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3667
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:08 pm
Location: Front Row in the "Black Hole" of Allegiant Stadium
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 128 times
Grassroots Team: Broadview

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby heater31 » Sat Apr 12, 2014 10:36 am

Cohiba wrote:
Q. wrote:
morell wrote:
Yank Man wrote:[quote="morell"]

Player apathy
Work/Sport Quandary
Competition from other sports
Time poor lifestyles
Geography
Demographics
Club density

etc

It's a complicated story.



A-get used the the points system, the majority are in favour and it's here to stay. Yes I believe there should be more flexibility with it, maybe that will come in time.
B-get used to player payments it's here for good, times changed years ago. Smart clubs work a way to compete without throwing big $$$$ around. Be it right or wrong it ain't changing. :)
I've racked my feeble mind on how to get rid of player payments (for lower divisions in particular) as I think it's having a massive derogatory impact on our sport and league. The only solutions I've ever thought of either require a massive shift in the mindset of the league, sport and its players, or a massive influx of resources to monitor and police it...or support from the state and feds:

If player x is getting income from playing sport, that should be taxed, unless I am mistaken.

Therefore, technically, players that receive said income could be audited and fined by the ATO.

If this happened enough times eventually individuals and clubs would have to begin declaring their payments.

If that then happened for long enough, then there would be records available for, say, an office of Recreation and Sport to begin putting a stamp on it, and possibly, providing some of those records to approved governing bodies, such as the SAAFL.

From there, they could put in policies and regulation to control it.

Pipe dream and perhaps draconian.


Can we then claim for expenses like equipment, medical, insurances etc?


Of course.......also Work Cover for injuries sustained at the "office"..... :roll: :)[/quote]

With the supposed figures of player payments it could be argued that it is not a hobby anymore. SANFL players are taxed like a 2nd job, including the reserves players that are paid peanuts!

Filling out mountains of work cover paper work should also put a stop to clubs throwing cash about Willy billy...
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16539
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 525 times
Been liked: 1263 times

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Bombers4EVA » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:22 pm

Yesterday arvo on Triple M. Ditts and Roo were discussing about Kilburn again and the word going around is that they are going to play in Div 3 in the next round. But if they cant get players then they could be looking at folding. Did anyone else here the conversation yesterday around 4:30pm?
Bombers4EVA
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:05 am
Has liked: 326 times
Been liked: 89 times

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Yank Man » Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:27 am

Interesting that round 3 saw 19 games throughout the league decided by between 104pts and 436, with 7 of them A grade clubs. Seems like more than the obvious are struggling particularly with depth. :(
Yank Man
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2868
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 7:15 am
Has liked: 57 times
Been liked: 317 times
Grassroots Team: Edwardstown

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Cohiba » Sun Apr 27, 2014 12:30 pm

Yank Man wrote:Interesting that round 3 saw 19 games throughout the league decided by between 104pts and 436, with 7 of them A grade clubs. Seems like more than the obvious are struggling particularly with depth. :(


It's been cooked and done before but on Yank's stats..... and history would suggest....... a merge for some of these Clubs would preserve proud traditions and this at least would be a better outcome than seeing"pride before a fall" result as a sad end to a Club and it's supporters.
User avatar
Cohiba
Reserves
 
 
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 11:53 am
Has liked: 10 times
Been liked: 41 times

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Q. » Sun Apr 27, 2014 2:37 pm

We're being slightly alarmist. Yes, a couple of those margins are effin huge, but it's always been a case that the bottom teams get pumped by the top teams.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2396 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby bickle » Sun Apr 27, 2014 5:00 pm

....
Last edited by bickle on Sun Apr 27, 2014 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bickle
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 487
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:45 pm
Location: Always In Front
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby bickle » Sun Apr 27, 2014 5:01 pm

bickle wrote:yeah there seems to be a "have" V's a "have's not" going around more than usual this year.
money is an issue with some clubs having more money than sense then there's the have more cents than money.
but I would say there's other issues that effect clubs, players not committed to play at the highest level the club is in, not experienced enough committees, lack of volunteers to do the unrewarded stuff that happens in the back ground & the big one creating the right culture for your club. some clubs will have to take a hit to get that culture right.
I know Angle Vale have lost a few players but there has been about 10-12 clearances with the other 30 not playing cause of work, family, just about to start one or fear of getting injured. we've seen this with 10 regular A grade starters missing from the first 3 rounds of the season due to work or slight injuries. no depth.
maybe this is the leveller year that shapes what's to come in the next few years with clubs going on or slowly getting buried against the so called bigger clubs.
whatever happens we'll still have a local game of footy to go see even though you might not really support that club.
have heard the SAAFL are brain storming about how to fix mass exits from clubs to keep them viable. you never know they might re float the idea they had a few years ago of north, south east & west divisions, or whatever they were going to call it.
from what I've heard around the traps this is an issue with the SAAFL.
will have to wait & see their proposal on this problem, if there is in fact a problem.
User avatar
bickle
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 487
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 9:45 pm
Location: Always In Front
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby morell » Sun Apr 27, 2014 6:32 pm

Q. wrote:We're being slightly alarmist. Yes, a couple of those margins are effin huge, but it's always been a case that the bottom teams get pumped by the top teams.

Agree, but it's usually 20 goal margins, not 30, 40 and 50. Also, the sheer number of clubs copping these margins is unprecedented in my time.
User avatar
morell
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6384
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:56 pm
Has liked: 2017 times
Been liked: 1141 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Q. » Sun Apr 27, 2014 7:40 pm

What's unprecedented is the whinging. Two years ago you just copped it on the chin and rebuilt the next year.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2396 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby bennymacca » Sun Apr 27, 2014 8:59 pm

Q. wrote:We're being slightly alarmist. Yes, a couple of those margins are effin huge, but it's always been a case that the bottom teams get pumped by the top teams.


any more than a 20 goal thrashing is too much. and definitely shouldnt happen in a competition that has divisions designed to eliminate that.
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: Clubs in strife

Postby Q. » Sun Apr 27, 2014 10:50 pm

It's not designed to eliminate it, it's designed to give clubs a chance at rebuilding in the following year by playing at a slightly lower standard.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2396 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  Adelaide Footy League

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |