Dols wrote:Blokes like no mercy, continuous bullshit posts. Fine talk about the game not all the other crap.
Don't like it don't read it.
Don't get much out of your posts!

by NO-MERCY » Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:08 pm
Dols wrote:Blokes like no mercy, continuous bullshit posts. Fine talk about the game not all the other crap.
by smac » Mon Apr 16, 2012 6:22 pm
by Old Dog New Tricks » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:14 pm
by LMA » Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:52 pm
Old Dog New Tricks wrote:I hear a particular real estate office on Semaphore Rd was like Rundle Mall with board members from a losing club on the weekend going in and out of the El Presidente's office.
Surely not crisis talks already![]()
![]()
by NO-MERCY » Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:49 pm
LMA wrote:Old Dog New Tricks wrote:I hear a particular real estate office on Semaphore Rd was like Rundle Mall with board members from a losing club on the weekend going in and out of the El Presidente's office.
Surely not crisis talks already![]()
![]()
n your attempt at humour is actually on Military Rd![]()
by Old Dog New Tricks » Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:49 pm
Quite right, doesn't change the fact thoughLMA wrote:Old Dog New Tricks wrote:I hear a particular real estate office on Semaphore Rd was like Rundle Mall with board members from a losing club on the weekend going in and out of the El Presidente's office.
Surely not crisis talks already![]()
![]()
Century 21 or Brock Harcourts ?
I think the one that is the main ingredient in your attempt at humour is actually on Military Rd![]()
by lutz » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:10 pm
Old Dog New Tricks wrote:I hear a particular real estate office on Semaphore Rd was like Rundle Mall with board members from a losing club on the weekend going in and out of the El Presidente's office.
Surely not crisis talks already![]()
![]()
by Old Dog New Tricks » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:39 pm
by Cash 123 » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:10 am
Old Dog New Tricks wrote:LMA wrote:Quite right, doesn't change the fact thoughOld Dog New Tricks wrote:I hear a particular real estate office on Semaphore Rd was like Rundle Mall with board members from a losing club on the weekend going in and out of the El Presidente's office.
Century 21 or Brock Harcourts ?
I think the one that is the main ingredient in your attempt at humour is actually on Military Rd![]()
by barry_watson » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:14 pm
lutz wrote:New Era wrote:2:15 PM
Sat 14/Apr 17.17-119 Portland def. Port District 16.15-111![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm tipping Rocket should start wearing a steel vest to ward of the steak knives that'll be coming his way
haha yea think he could use it to protect his ribs too.
Frustrating game to watch from my perspective. Districts skills were pretty average, particularly entry into the forward line. The umpires were very quick to blow the whistle, a lot of soft free kicks paid to both sides!! (Not saying it was the reason Portland won)
Portland were very determined all day, and too good. A few new blokes I didnt recognise. Draper was very good on Johncock, giving away 30kgs (I'd say), made it tough for him all day. Perkins was solid as usual, and did pretty well against a big body in Beeching; both of em rucked most of the day n woulda been stuffed by the end of the game! Miller was good when he wanted to be, but went missing for too much of the game. Wareing was BOG imo, kicking 4 in the first half, and setting the example for his side, was a bit quieter in the second half, not sure if it's because he changed his boots, or cos he was getting tagged![]()
Cochiarro was solid all day, as was Prior, who kept Catterall and at times Beeching pretty quiet. De Palma kicked a few goals at important times to stabilise Portland. Laslett's second half was very good, and a big reason they held off a late come back from Districts after they were 5 goals down at 3/4 time. Gein did an ok keeping Mcdowall relatively quiet, and Dickenson was ok on a wing.
Gates, Rosenthal, and Maddern were pretty good for Districts, trying hard all day. Too many blokes went missing for PDFC, and will be interesting to see if any/many changes are made this week.
I wasn't sure what to expect from Portland before Saturday, but think they'll win a few games at home this season, they play it pretty well!
Districts will have to put in a lot more effort than what they produced Saturday if theyre going to have a chance against Walkerville, who are appear to be in great form already!
PS great effort by Flinders Park, I did not excpect that result either. A bit surprised with their B grade result though, Adelaide Uni are strong in that grade, but Flinders were last year too, n are supposed to have heaps of depth.
by piccachu » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:17 pm
Is that the maddern from port magpies?
by Slots It Through » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:25 pm
piccachu wrote:Is that the maddern from port magpies?
nope
by The Dark Knight » Wed Apr 18, 2012 5:26 pm
piccachu wrote:Is that the maddern from port magpies?
nope
by dukes » Thu Apr 19, 2012 12:10 am
by Old Dog New Tricks » Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:22 am
Interesting observation dukes. I wonder if the school or the old toffs turn a blind eye to the dillution of what an Old Scholars FC is in the name of trying to move up the grades.dukes wrote:Quite a contingent of ex Mt lofty players at paoc with premiership players broadbridge, chapman, 2x artis brothers and Temne all joining in recent years ? Is this a chance coincidence or a deliberate recruiting ploy ?
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:02 am
by finn » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:12 am
Old Dog New Tricks wrote:Interesting observation dukes. I wonder if the school or the old toffs turn a blind eye to the dillution of what an Old Scholars FC is in the name of trying to move up the grades.dukes wrote:Quite a contingent of ex Mt lofty players at paoc with premiership players broadbridge, chapman, 2x artis brothers and Temne all joining in recent years ? Is this a chance coincidence or a deliberate recruiting ploy ?
I know I wouldn't be too happy if my son was an old scholar and was missing out on a game before non old scholars. Still, I would imagine it would be very difficult to stick to your roots these days otherwise a club would probably meet the same fate as the old Teachers FC. Can anyone tell me if you still have to be a University student to play at Unis.
by teaoby » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:13 am
dukes wrote:Quite a contingent of ex Mt lofty players at paoc with premiership players broadbridge, chapman, 2x artis brothers and Temne all joining in recent years ? Is this a chance coincidence or a deliberate recruiting ploy ?
by teaoby » Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:16 am
finn wrote:Old Dog New Tricks wrote:Interesting observation dukes. I wonder if the school or the old toffs turn a blind eye to the dillution of what an Old Scholars FC is in the name of trying to move up the grades.dukes wrote:Quite a contingent of ex Mt lofty players at paoc with premiership players broadbridge, chapman, 2x artis brothers and Temne all joining in recent years ? Is this a chance coincidence or a deliberate recruiting ploy ?
I know I wouldn't be too happy if my son was an old scholar and was missing out on a game before non old scholars. Still, I would imagine it would be very difficult to stick to your roots these days otherwise a club would probably meet the same fate as the old Teachers FC. Can anyone tell me if you still have to be a University student to play at Unis.
Nope, you don't have to. That ruling was changed years ago along but long after the rule that you had to play with University if you went there. The vast majority (about 98%) of players are students or are alumni of the University however.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |