SA Footy

scottroo wrote:Think it’s scoring a certain amount while restricting the opponent to a certain amount

They won the GF last year and the runner up went up, they've won comfortably all 3 games this year, they were the best div 2 team I seen last year.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

scottroo wrote:Think it’s scoring a certain amount while restricting the opponent to a certain amount

They won the GF last year and the runner up went up, they've won comfortably all 3 games this year, they were the best div 2 team I seen last year.

Div 1 stayed the same.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

scottroo wrote:Think it’s scoring a certain amount while restricting the opponent to a certain amount

They won the GF last year and the runner up went up, they've won comfortably all 3 games this year, they were the best div 2 team I seen last year.

Quiet please

Brodlach wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

scottroo wrote:Think it’s scoring a certain amount while restricting the opponent to a certain amount

They won the GF last year and the runner up went up, they've won comfortably all 3 games this year, they were the best div 2 team I seen last year.

Quiet please

Is that better?

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Yep, amended fixtures should be online shortly Id suspect.

OK, I'm pretty interested in how the 15's pans out, Flinders Park have been on the arse end of some floggings but they've played the 3 strongest sides.

CLG should've been promoted from the get go.

We have also been on the receiving end of some floggings in the 15's as well and didn't go down. I haven't got exact scores but I would think our percentage would be maybe 8-10%.

What club gadj?

gadj1976 wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Yep, amended fixtures should be online shortly Id suspect.

OK, I'm pretty interested in how the 15's pans out, Flinders Park have been on the arse end of some floggings but they've played the 3 strongest sides.

CLG should've been promoted from the get go.

We have also been on the receiving end of some floggings in the 15's as well and didn't go down. I haven't got exact scores but I would think our percentage would be maybe 8-10%.

What div are you in? Walkies, Athelstone?

Does anyone know of any grades that got re-jigged?

Lightning McQueen wrote:Does anyone know of any grades that got re-jigged?

you would assume that most of them have

Bluedemon wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:Does anyone know of any grades that got re-jigged?

you would assume that most of them have

I've found one, Athelstone went from div 3 to div 4 in the 15's, it made sense as they were both 9 team comps.

They surprise me a bit as they were quite competitive two seasons back as were Gaza, they had a couple of absolute guns.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

gadj1976 wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Yep, amended fixtures should be online shortly Id suspect.

OK, I'm pretty interested in how the 15's pans out, Flinders Park have been on the arse end of some floggings but they've played the 3 strongest sides.

CLG should've been promoted from the get go.

We have also been on the receiving end of some floggings in the 15's as well and didn't go down. I haven't got exact scores but I would think our percentage would be maybe 8-10%.

What div are you in? Walkies, Athelstone?

2

Dutchy wrote:What club gadj?

Modbury.

gadj1976 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:What club gadj?

Modbury.

Have you guys lost a few players from last year? I know my lad's team beat you guys early in the season before he changed clubs but you were pretty competitive for most of the season.

The amount of play down players is ridiculous. Our under 14s team have been belted in 2 games so far not just on the scoreboard. We have been belted up physically, 4 concussion cases in first round alone. I've seen opposition players with beards and moustaches, 1 even drove away from the game.
If a team doesn't have any play down players, the opposition should have none.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

gadj1976 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:What club gadj?

Modbury.

Have you guys lost a few players from last year? I know my lad's team beat you guys early in the season before he changed clubs but you were pretty competitive for most of the season.

Not really. I think the comp has strengthened if anything. That team also has win about ten games in three years so confidence could be an issue.

Watched the Ingle Farm vs Brighton U16 girls game yesterday.. some of the Ingle Farm girls need an attitude check - i'd hate to coach that age group, must be bloody tough.

However, must say i've found a new favorite player - the #10 on the wing for BOS was incredible! After watching girls footy for a number of years now, have seen some handy girls over the journey, but not sure i've seen too many girls with a better kick than the young lady yesterday. Great vantage point as time keeper upstairs yesterday, her decision making and precision was top shelf.

Some very handy players in the Bombers lineup.

In other junior footy news, umpired U9s yesteday - covered 4km and was elite.

Cant walk today.

Moe wrote:The amount of play down players is ridiculous. Our under 14s team have been belted in 2 games so far not just on the scoreboard. We have been belted up physically, 4 concussion cases in first round alone. I've seen opposition players with beards and moustaches, 1 even drove away from the game.
If a team doesn't have any play down players, the opposition should have none.

I thought they stopped them completely.

Had the best umpiring Ive seen for a long time in our game yesterday, 2 young kids who let the game flow, paid the obvious frees and paid sling tackles consistently which meant all the boys adjusted their tackling techniques, great for all involved.

Dutchy wrote:Had the best umpiring Ive seen for a long time in our game yesterday, 2 young kids who let the game flow, paid the obvious frees and paid sling tackles consistently which meant all the boys adjusted their tackling techniques, great for all involved.

I witnessed the worst I've seen for some time, you're doing a pretty dreadful job when both boxes despise you.