SA Footy

How bout someone actually just names clubs and tells the full story, rather than this constant cryptic crap.

The league never kicks anyone out in the end. They didn't let Wingies back in after a the single team thing kicked in but that's about it. SN (and I'm taking a wild guess at this )could end up on a AAAA and get a couple of points docked per game suspension.
Let's say they get the flick, would Seaton get an invite to div 2 and then there is a shuffle or does the league extend an invite to our higher ranked southern friends? Combo of both?

laser wrote:The league never kicks anyone out in the end. They didn't let Wingies back in after a the single team thing kicked in but that's about it. SN (and I'm taking a wild guess at this )could end up on a AAAA and get a couple of points docked per game suspension.
Let's say they get the flick, would Seaton get an invite to div 2 and then there is a shuffle or does the league extend an invite to our higher ranked southern friends? Combo of both?

Scotch and Pembroke would be asked to stay up before Seaton were offered a spot

bird of prey wrote:How bout someone actually just names clubs and tells the full story, rather than this constant cryptic crap.

Salisbury North & Salisbury West

bird of prey wrote:How bout someone actually just names clubs and tells the full story, rather than this constant cryptic crap.

He prob heard that from Mick Evans at the waterloo sunday morning.

Footy Chick wrote:

laser wrote:The league never kicks anyone out in the end. They didn't let Wingies back in after a the single team thing kicked in but that's about it. SN (and I'm taking a wild guess at this )could end up on a AAAA and get a couple of points docked per game suspension.
Let's say they get the flick, would Seaton get an invite to div 2 and then there is a shuffle or does the league extend an invite to our higher ranked southern friends? Combo of both?

Scotch and Pembroke would be asked to stay up before Seaton were offered a spot

Ah yes of course. Thanks FC for keeping me on track.

Ive heard one of the most idiotic things for 2017. The salisibury north and west peeps are putting together a ticket of clubs on amended affiliations to run for election at this years AGM with the intention of getting rid of those agreements. A President friend of mine got a phone call in the last few days from the Norf people trying to rally support. Good luck with that you igorant fools. Who's going to vote for that besides the clubs on AAAs and how many of them are there, 4 or 5 ?

As my mate told you, my club reckons the league is too soft on you let alone letting you off your aggreements.

Old Red wrote:Who's going to vote for that besides the clubs on AAAs and how many of them are there, 4 or 5 ?.

I wouldn't be so certain clubs on AAA's would vote for them to be removed either though..

Old Red wrote:Ive heard one of the most idiotic things for 2017. The salisibury north and west peeps are putting together a ticket of clubs on amended affiliations to run for election at this years AGM with the intention of getting rid of those agreements. A President friend of mine got a phone call in the last few days from the Norf people trying to rally support. Good luck with that you igorant fools. Who's going to vote for that besides the clubs on AAAs and how many of them are there, 4 or 5 ?

As my mate told you, my club reckons the league is too soft on you let alone letting you off your aggreements.

A league run by Salisbury North, Salisbury West, Smithfield and Eastern Park. What could go wrong?

Is Gino their proposed President?

#bringbackthecdfa

Vote 1 Gino

jo172 wrote:A league run by Salisbury North, Salisbury West, Smithfield and Eastern Park. What could go wrong?

Is Gino their proposed President?

First rule of fight club.. I mean of the new league - introducing the "1 on 1" rule they have in Ice Hockey.