Page 171 of 224

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:38 am
by heater31
marbles wrote:
carey wrote:
Q. wrote:How many points were deducted from each team?


9 from each side.


ewww mitchell park stuck in div 6 now :D


CU have Angle Vale and Mitchell Park to come yet. Barring another player brain fade they should be able to climb out of the bottom 2

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:39 am
by Look Good In Leather
carey wrote:
Q. wrote:How many points were deducted from each team?


9 from each side.

That's ridiculous

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:42 am
by carey
mighty hounds wrote:
Mr Beefy wrote:
norm11 wrote:
carey wrote:Was de-registered by the club and giving life.

Doesn't stop the damage the actions of one idiot has on a whole club tho.

What happened?

19/07/2014 23/07/2014 Brenton Bain Central United D6 Striking Negligent High Medium Guilty 3
19/07/2014 23/07/2014 Brenton Bain Central United D6 Spitting - - - Guilty 6


Is he the big FF?


No. The Goal kicking Bain is a forward pocket this guy plays wing half forward.

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:43 am
by carey
heater31 wrote:
marbles wrote:
carey wrote:
Q. wrote:How many points were deducted from each team?


9 from each side.


ewww mitchell park stuck in div 6 now :D


CU have Angle Vale and Mitchell Park to come yet. Barring another player brain fade they should be able to climb out of the bottom 2


I would expect Centrals to win there next 3 in AV, MP and Mawson Lakes 2 of them wins should be enough to stay in div 6

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:45 am
by marbles
would such a penalty be inflicted on a div 1 team?

or extend that...

is this penalty been inflicted to clubs who are on their last warnings, and are on agreements that they can remain in the comps, but if they cross the line theyll be heavily punished in this fashion?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:54 am
by beef
marbles wrote:would such a penalty be inflicted on a div 1 team?

Salisbury north Yes
Probably not any other team

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:55 am
by Q.
marbles wrote:would such a penalty be inflicted on a div 1 team?


If they breached their conditions, then yes?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:56 am
by The Informer
carey wrote:Was de-registered by the club and giving life.

Doesn't stop the damage the actions of one idiot has on a whole club tho.


Carey did his dad used to play out there?

For some reason i think i rememeber a Bain playing when i was out there?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 10:02 am
by marbles
Q. wrote:
marbles wrote:would such a penalty be inflicted on a div 1 team?


If they breached their conditions, then yes?


i edited the original post but arent penalties like this only given to clubs who have pissed the league off so much with previous incedents that theyve had to agree to these conditions to remain in the competitions

not all clubs face this possibility do they?

those with clean histories wouldnt lose points like this if a player strikes?

smithfield & CU have been hit hard because they are on the more strict affiliation agreement due to previous incidents?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 10:15 am
by zedman
marbles wrote:
Q. wrote:
marbles wrote:would such a penalty be inflicted on a div 1 team?


If they breached their conditions, then yes?


i edited the original post but arent penalties like this only given to clubs who have pissed the league off so much with previous incedents that theyve had to agree to these conditions to remain in the competitions

not all clubs face this possibility do they?

those with clean histories wouldnt lose points like this if a player strikes?

smithfield & CU have been hit hard because they are on the more strict affiliation agreement due to previous incidents?


yes to most..

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:17 pm
by human_torpedo
Will Schar's absence be just the tonic for Daniel Thomas to regain his mojo as the lead ruck at Rosies? Big wraps on him, especially his tap work, hopefully he can give the mids first use.. Handy grunt added back to the mdifield for Rosies tomorrow as well

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:20 pm
by zedman
human_torpedo wrote:Will Schar's absence be just the tonic for Daniel Thomas to regain his mojo as the lead ruck at Rosies? Big wraps on him, especially his tap work, hopefully he can give the mids first use.. Handy grunt added back to the mdifield for Rosies tomorrow as well


is he a brother of tyson?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 12:22 pm
by human_torpedo
zedman wrote:
human_torpedo wrote:Will Schar's absence be just the tonic for Daniel Thomas to regain his mojo as the lead ruck at Rosies? Big wraps on him, especially his tap work, hopefully he can give the mids first use.. Handy grunt added back to the mdifield for Rosies tomorrow as well


is he a brother of tyson?


Nah, unlike Tyson, Daniel has no Samoan heritage in him at all.. No relation

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 1:40 pm
by Lightning McQueen
carey wrote:Was de-registered by the club and giving life.

Doesn't stop the damage the actions of one idiot has on a whole club tho.


Very disappointing, I was only speaking last night to a mate from Fitzroy that gave you guys a huge wrap for your onfield conduct.

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 1:48 pm
by marbles
the ladder yet to be changed? is this another safooty.net fictional story

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:06 pm
by The Informer
marbles wrote:the ladder yet to be changed? is this another safooty.net fictional story

Nah pal this true, Carey would know and wouldnt make stuff up like that, plus i just soke to a key player for them and he said same.

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 2:14 pm
by marbles
The_Informer wrote:
marbles wrote:the ladder yet to be changed? is this another safooty.net fictional story

Nah pal this true, Carey would know and wouldnt make stuff up like that, plus i just soke to a key player for them and he said same.


haha ladder now changed :)

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:47 pm
by carey
Lightning McQueen wrote:
carey wrote:Was de-registered by the club and giving life.

Doesn't stop the damage the actions of one idiot has on a whole club tho.


Very disappointing, I was only speaking last night to a mate from Fitzroy that gave you guys a huge wrap for your onfield conduct.


There has been so much work put in this year. As far as internal suspensions for those not adhering to the rules the club set out at the start of the year but in light of this you cant help but feel its a huge kick in the guts and takes us 3 steps back.

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 7:16 pm
by morell
How have the playing group taken it carey? Any walked away? Or has it made everyone more determined?

Re: SAAFL division 6 2014

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 8:58 pm
by Yank Man
morell wrote:How have the playing group taken it carey? Any walked away? Or has it made everyone more determined?




WOW, just heard all of this. Shame because I thought CU were fantastic with their discipline against us, all bar Woodward getting a bit loose and Carey controlling the situation extremely well.

That said it smacks of poor reaction by the league, 9 pts???? Wtf is that all about. They know MP, AV and The Crabs are still pondering next year and CU will win 2 minimum of their next 3 and MP maybe 1 which keeps CU in Div 6 next year. I am becoming very very disillusioned with the current suspensions to players and clubs. I understand that clubs on notice need to do everything right but bloody hell really good people who bleed for their club are continually getting kicked up the arse and it's no fault of theirs. :twisted: