SA Footy

Footy Chick wrote:

oldman wrote:the SANFL are involved,

The SANFL aren’t stepping in at all.

WOSFC have appealed to a SANFL tribunal as is their right after the SACFL have also told WOSFC that there is no valid permit.

The Bedge wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

oldman wrote:the SANFL are involved,

The SANFL aren’t stepping in at all.

WOSFC have appealed to a SANFL tribunal as is their right after the SACFL have also told WOSFC that there is no valid permit.

So they are involved.

He didn't say they were stepping in, he said they were involved

oldman wrote:Westmister appeal is happening.
Not sure why but the SANFL are involved, the permit in question was approved is my mail from very reliable source.

The Adelaide Footy League is no longer "Amateur" clubs are spending significant amounts of money to improve and becoming far more professional, it would appear after the last couple of weeks with decisions made by the league that clubs could be starting to question the leagues handling and professionalism.

gazzamagoo wrote:

oldman wrote:Westmister appeal is happening.
Not sure why but the SANFL are involved, the permit in question was approved is my mail from very reliable source.

The Adelaide Footy League is no longer "Amateur" clubs are spending significant amounts of money to improve and becoming far more professional, it would appear after the last couple of weeks with decisions made by the league that clubs could be starting to question the leagues handling and professionalism.

Allegedly the permit was approved, just not presented at the match.

oldman wrote:

gazzamagoo wrote:

oldman wrote:Westmister appeal is happening.
Not sure why but the SANFL are involved, the permit in question was approved is my mail from very reliable source.

The Adelaide Footy League is no longer "Amateur" clubs are spending significant amounts of money to improve and becoming far more professional, it would appear after the last couple of weeks with decisions made by the league that clubs could be starting to question the leagues handling and professionalism.

Allegedly the permit was approved, just not presented at the match.

Not sure presenting a permit at the match is required? I would have thought it pretty easy for Westminster to provide the approved permit and why would the league come to the decision it has if they approved the permit in the first place. Also why did Westminster wait till the end of the season before it decided to appeal?

Dutchy wrote:Morphie Parks going down? Going to be way too strong in Div 4

Sticks28 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Morphie Parks going down? Going to be way too strong in Div 4

That’s debatable - no depth whatsoever and wouldn’t suprise me if they lose a few - they are horrendous

gazzamagoo wrote:

southernbulldog wrote:Noticed Josh Glenn playing for Golden Grove yesterday.

Yep, I watched him play, GG have a crook old side, must be huge brown paper bags up that way!
Josh is lean & mean, could easily step back into SANFL next season but he wants to play on with Shenton & Co.

MoP wrote:

gazzamagoo wrote:

southernbulldog wrote:Noticed Josh Glenn playing for Golden Grove yesterday.

Yep, I watched him play, GG have a crook old side, must be huge brown paper bags up that way!
Josh is lean & mean, could easily step back into SANFL next season but he wants to play on with Shenton & Co.

Massive pick-up for GG. You don't get many young, ex-AFL players as a zero-pointer! According to all reports, serving the 4-year drug ban hasn't hindered his form.

oldman wrote:Obviously the Westminster appeal is not going anywhere. Wednesday night with no notification.

Former Glory wrote:

oldman wrote:Obviously the Westminster appeal is not going anywhere. Wednesday night with no notification.

Appeal successful

Under_Scrutiny wrote:

Former Glory wrote:

oldman wrote:Obviously the Westminster appeal is not going anywhere. Wednesday night with no notification.

Appeal successful

SCOTCH the big loser from this

Footy Chick wrote:

Under_Scrutiny wrote:

Former Glory wrote:

oldman wrote:Obviously the Westminster appeal is not going anywhere. Wednesday night with no notification.

Appeal successful

SCOTCH the big loser from this

Dunno about that, WOS have just spent 20k to probably get flogged this week and drop out anyway.

It's a lot of money to spend for the principle..

MW wrote:They just need to enrol one reception child and it will be covered

Footy Chick wrote:

MW wrote:They just need to enrol one reception child and it will be covered

You're possibly over-estimating Westminster's exclusivity