SA Footy

morell wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Make Hackham look like angels yet wouldn't let them in!

Would hope the AdFL treated a current and (reasonably) long term affiliate a bit different to someone coming late to the party yeah?

Not aware of their members running onto the field to hit an official

Dutchy clearly very keen to dump their rubbish on to the AdFL.
We've got enough problems as it is, we won't be taking yours.

Dutchy wrote:

morell wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Make Hackham look like angels yet wouldn't let them in!

Would hope the AdFL treated a current and (reasonably) long term affiliate a bit different to someone coming late to the party yeah?

Not aware of their members running onto the field to hit an official

Well no but as I said, North Pines have been a long term affiliate of the SAAFL (AdFL) whereas Hackham haven't. They're an existing customer, in other words.

The standards are therefore obviously going to be very different.

I'd suggest if North Pines were doing this in some other league and wanted to join they wouldn't even get to the table.

Trader wrote:Dutchy clearly very keen to dump their rubbish on to the AdFL.
We've got enough problems as it is, we won't be taking yours.

Bit harsh, Hackham have had their on field issues but I can't remember any off field issues that seem to haunt the clubs up North

Should've given NP the arse.

Zartan wrote:Should've given NP the arse.

Suspect there is a bit of self interest in this viewpoint

morell wrote:

Zartan wrote:Should've given NP the arse.

Suspect there is a bit of self interest in this viewpoint

The second he heard Nth Pines were out he would've went straight to vulture mode stalking carcus!

At least half a dozen messages would've been sent.

carey wrote:The second he heard Nth Pines were out he would've went straight to vulture mode stalking carcus!

At least half a dozen messages would've been sent.

Turn it up.. only vulture around here are all the D5 premiership players flooding back to win a cheap D7 flag

Zartan wrote:

carey wrote:The second he heard Nth Pines were out he would've went straight to vulture mode stalking carcus!

At least half a dozen messages would've been sent.

Turn it up.. only vulture around here are all the D5 premiership players flooding back to win a cheap D7 flag

I've never won a Div 5 flag mate sorry to disappoint.

I notice you didn't deny!

carey wrote:I've never played Div 5 mate sorry to disappoint!

For the record, no one off top of my head at NP interests me that i would bother chasing or contacting to come play for me

Dutchy wrote:

Trader wrote:Dutchy clearly very keen to dump their rubbish on to the AdFL.
We've got enough problems as it is, we won't be taking yours.

Bit harsh, Hackham have had their on field issues but I can't remember any off field issues that seem to haunt the clubs up North

Dutchy, please......
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-29/a ... fmredir=sm
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/messenger ... 572bee2cd0

Not sure how the HFC can control something that an individual does near Adelaide Oval. The other incident was on-field which I acknowledged has been an issue.

Dutchy wrote:Not sure how the HFC can control something that an individual does near Adelaide Oval. The other incident was on-field which I acknowledged has been an issue.

A) seems to be the definition of off field
B) every club in this situation seems to say how can they control an individual. Whether running from the boundary into the fray at or near Adelaide oval
C) if smackham were in the the ADFL with their reputation, would you want them in your league?

No angels but plenty of worse examples in the ADFL in recent times.

Anyway mute point, sadly the club will struggle to survive I suspect.

Dutchy wrote:No angels but plenty of worse examples in the ADFL in recent times.

Anyway mute point, sadly the club will struggle to survive I suspect.

Hate to pick on you mate, but it's a moot point, not mute. Bit of a pet peeve of mine.

Up there with alot instead of a lot.
Boom recruit instead of boon recruit.

morell wrote:

Dutchy wrote:No angels but plenty of worse examples in the ADFL in recent times.

Anyway mute point, sadly the club will struggle to survive I suspect.

Hate to pick on you mate, but it's a moot point, not mute. Bit of a pet peeve of mine.

Up there with alot instead of a lot.
Boom recruit instead of boon recruit.

You'd think there better then that hey?

I'm weird, some of them don't bother me. I think if it's obviously just a typo, mistake or laziness instead of actually not knowing, I am more forgiving.

I typed this sentence incredibly carefully to avoid any mistakes.

morell wrote:I'm weird, some of them don't bother me. I think if it's obviously just a typo, mistake or laziness instead of actually not knowing, I am more forgiving.

I typed this sentence incredibly carefully to avoid any mistakes.

I think you covered that topic in one fell swoop

Lightning McQueen wrote:You'd think there better then that hey?

i see what you did there!