by human_torpedo » Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:50 pm
by piccachu » Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:52 pm
End of the day, there were 41 other players that day who were also on video playing that game, yet none of them threw an elbow to a head. 7 weeks seems steep, but the fact is he did it. Play the game within the spirit and rules, and there is no issue..
by teaoby » Fri Aug 03, 2012 1:59 pm
bubba love wrote:how could they appeal when theres clear evidence against him? everyone need to forget about the previous incident where uni's sent in evidence of a sling tackle and focus on whats happend here, a portland player deliberately elbowed a uni player in the head, theres no place for it in the game
by bubba love » Fri Aug 03, 2012 2:45 pm
by Dols » Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:51 pm
bubba love wrote:no they would not have dobbed themselves in but if portland had been filming the game and one of there players was elbowed in the head they would of done the exact same thing
by LMA » Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:58 pm
by numb nuts » Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:12 pm
Dols wrote:bubba love wrote:no they would not have dobbed themselves in but if portland had been filming the game and one of there players was elbowed in the head they would of done the exact same thing
what is uni going to do then when something like this happens and their player is responsible. Are other teams now going to get court orders for uni to produce the video? It can occur. It is suppose to be amateur league not amateur hour. Uni still disgraceful. And the league make up your own mind because if I put it here it will get removed.
by Snake_Eyes » Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:17 pm
by finn » Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:31 pm
numb nuts wrote:Dols wrote:bubba love wrote:no they would not have dobbed themselves in but if portland had been filming the game and one of there players was elbowed in the head they would of done the exact same thing
what is uni going to do then when something like this happens and their player is responsible. Are other teams now going to get court orders for uni to produce the video? It can occur. It is suppose to be amateur league not amateur hour. Uni still disgraceful. And the league make up your own mind because if I put it here it will get removed.
Uni are a disgrace of a footy club now. No one will ever trust them again. B4 it gets 2 late just them having cameras
by Jimmy_041 » Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:37 am
Snake_Eyes wrote:Video cameras do not win games.
My suggestion: Build a bridge.
by NO-MERCY » Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:14 am
by numb nuts » Sun Aug 05, 2012 2:28 am
NO-MERCY wrote:Can someone from Uni post it on here for all of us to see & let us judge for ourselves if it deserves 7 weeks.
Is it as clear as they say it is?
Let us be the judge.
by marbles » Sun Aug 05, 2012 2:39 pm
by NO-MERCY » Sun Aug 05, 2012 3:09 pm
by Sturtman » Sun Aug 05, 2012 4:17 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:Portland can still miss out on playing finals football, it will all come down to their last minor round clash with Modbury at the Dome in a fortnights time, how important was yesterdays game v Walkerville?
It may prove very costly.
by marbles » Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:06 pm
by Yank Man » Tue Aug 07, 2012 1:55 pm
marbles wrote:its a stellar looking couple of weeks for the top 3 teams
Adelaide Uni 12 wins
Pt Districts 12 wins
TTG 11 wins
Round 17
Uni vs Port (for top spot)
TTG vs Portland (TTG for home final)
Round 18
Uni vs Eastern (Win)
Port vs POC (Win?)
TTG vs Walkerville (For a possible home final if it beats Portland this week)
So one of Uni or Port should get to 14 wins (unless draws)
One will definitely get to 13 wins
But can TTG get 13 wins and allow their percentage and consistent season to bring them a home final?
Come on wolves!!!!
by Blacks130 » Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:21 pm
The TTG people were telling us last week they don't qualify for a home final - something to do with beer.marbles wrote:But can TTG get 13 wins and allow their percentage and consistent season to bring them a home final?
by Yank Man » Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:09 pm
Blacks130 wrote:The TTG people were telling us last week they don't qualify for a home final - something to do with beer.marbles wrote:But can TTG get 13 wins and allow their percentage and consistent season to bring them a home final?
by Blacks130 » Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:33 pm
The TTG people would be interested if that is right but they were pretty sure of it.Yank Man wrote:Blacks130 wrote:The TTG people were telling us last week they don't qualify for a home final - something to do with beer.marbles wrote:But can TTG get 13 wins and allow their percentage and consistent season to bring them a home final?
Think that has changed Blacks130. Clubs who were sponsored by breweries other than West End wern't allowed to host home finals a few years ago but I reckon that changed at an executive meeting either last year or this. The powers to be can clarify it.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |