SA Footy

Booney wrote:Old mate #18 had an interesting day out, didn't he?

Salisbury West thought he had a great day.

Named him 5th best

jake the snake wrote:Is it true there’s an incident on video from the other division 6 game on the weekend?

It is true but that club is not an a AAA yet so I imagine they will be fine. Incident would be graded as reckless, low impact (probably would be medium but I think 4 weeks is too harsh of a penalty for it, so maybe change the intent to negligent) and high.

Lightning McQueen wrote:I love all the hypotheticals, I'm sure the league will do their investigations and work through it all.

I've seen the footage. No hypotheticals unless spoiling the opponents jaw with your knee and elbow is subjective

ramming23 wrote:

jake the snake wrote:Is it true there’s an incident on video from the other division 6 game on the weekend?

It is true but that club is not an a AAA yet so I imagine they will be fine. Incident would be graded as reckless, low impact (probably would be medium but I think 4 weeks is too harsh of a penalty for it, so maybe change the intent to negligent) and high.

Pretty sure a free kick was paid at the time too and maybe a 25, not 100% sure though I had beer goggles on.

MW wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:I love all the hypotheticals, I'm sure the league will do their investigations and work through it all.

I've seen the footage. No hypotheticals unless spoiling the opponents jaw with your knee and elbow is subjective

What we have seen is "fact", the proposed outcomes are hypotheticals, I know sweet FA on what the AAA sanctions are against Salisbury West so I'll wait and see the outcome in due time.

MW wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:I love all the hypotheticals, I'm sure the league will do their investigations and work through it all.

I've seen the footage. No hypotheticals unless spoiling the opponents jaw with your knee and elbow is subjective

Elbow is terrible - 8 to 10 weeks if history is any indication.

Knee I thought was ordinary at first, but more I watch it i'm inclined to think it was clumsy/poor judgement and not intentional - almost looks like he preparing to kick it off the ground, pulls out of the kick, collects the TOS player then kicks off the ground.. dunno.. definitely unnecessary but i'll give him benefit of the doubt on that one - not that it'll help his playing career anyway.

The Bedge wrote:

MW wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:I love all the hypotheticals, I'm sure the league will do their investigations and work through it all.

I've seen the footage. No hypotheticals unless spoiling the opponents jaw with your knee and elbow is subjective

Elbow is terrible - 8 to 10 weeks if history is any indication.

Knee I thought was ordinary at first, but more I watch it i'm inclined to think it was clumsy/poor judgement and not intentional - almost looks like he preparing to kick it off the ground, pulls out of the kick, collects the TOS player then kicks off the ground.. dunno.. definitely unnecessary but i'll give him benefit of the doubt on that one - not that it'll help his playing career anyway.

Agreed.

The Bedge wrote:

MW wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:I love all the hypotheticals, I'm sure the league will do their investigations and work through it all.

I've seen the footage. No hypotheticals unless spoiling the opponents jaw with your knee and elbow is subjective

Elbow is terrible - 8 to 10 weeks if history is any indication.

Knee I thought was ordinary at first, but more I watch it i'm inclined to think it was clumsy/poor judgement and not intentional - almost looks like he preparing to kick it off the ground, pulls out of the kick, collects the TOS player then kicks off the ground.. dunno.. definitely unnecessary but i'll give him benefit of the doubt on that one - not that it'll help his playing career anyway.

Think he loses any benefit of the doubt based on the other incident. People have gone quiet from early comments of nothing in it now that the vision is out.

Or people are happy for the league and tribunal to do their job, not the keyboard jury?

Post the footage on here please

and people wonder why I don't allow this stuff

Go look for it yourself

Can anyone tell me what the following have in common?

Dean Steele
Matt Leigh (x2)
Edwin Milera
Hayden Ramsey
Peter Lindsay
Mark Matheson
Jason Beveridge
Darrell McIntyre
Adam Jones (x2)*

*pending outcome of tribunal

The Bedge wrote:Can anyone tell me what the following have in common?

Dean Steele
Matt Leigh (x2)
Edwin Milera
Hayden Ramsey
Peter Lindsay
Mark Matheson
Jason Beveridge
Darrell McIntyre
Adam Jones (x2)*

*pending outcome of tribunal

All reports in matches in the last 2 seasons V Trinity and most are clubs on AAA

Footy Chick wrote:and people wonder why I don't allow this stuff

Go look for it yourself

Some of us don't use Stalkbook.

Computer Crashed wrote:Some of us don't use Stalkbook.

You have a son, use his.

Arch44 wrote:

The Bedge wrote:Can anyone tell me what the following have in common?

Dean Steele
Matt Leigh (x2)
Edwin Milera
Hayden Ramsey
Peter Lindsay
Mark Matheson
Jason Beveridge
Darrell McIntyre
Adam Jones (x2)*

*pending outcome of tribunal

All reports in matches in the last 2 seasons V Trinity and most are clubs on AAA

And I have little doubt that their ‘#&$@‘ of a coach would use other club’s AAA for his benefit too

Arch44 wrote:

The Bedge wrote:Can anyone tell me what the following have in common?

Dean Steele
Matt Leigh (x2)
Edwin Milera
Hayden Ramsey
Peter Lindsay
Mark Matheson
Jason Beveridge
Darrell McIntyre
Adam Jones (x2)*

*pending outcome of tribunal

All reports in matches in the last 2 seasons V Trinity and most are clubs on AAA

That list is nothing on Uni's, they're 2.0

The Bedge wrote:

Computer Crashed wrote:Some of us don't use Stalkbook.

You have a son, use his.

Find them for me.

Computer Crashed wrote:

The Bedge wrote:

Computer Crashed wrote:Some of us don't use Stalkbook.

You have a son, use his.

Find them for me.

Will be on Seven news tonight for your viewing pleasure

How the heck is this all trinity’s fault!?