SA Footy

Executive Member wrote:

number2 wrote:

Zartan wrote:

number2 wrote:Cant be good!

If found guilty, will be graded nothing other than intentional.

My point is he has been reported for headbutting so even if he didn't mean it then it will be negligent and get weeks.
Surely cant be found not guilty considering what has been said on this forum in regards to people seeing it happen live!

not sure the tribunal read the forum, they all have lives

I never read it

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Do Pooraka get the points for the match?

Come on LK, you are smarter than that. In all sport you only lose points and have them given to the opponent if you have effectively cheated with the players that have taken the field/pitch etc. in a particular game or games such as playing an ineligible player due to not being cleared, assumed name, too many player points, dodgy permits (which some have found out this year), playing whilst under suspension etc. etc.

Breaching a condition of affiliation be it the dreaded AAA, salary cap, drug offence etc. you lose competition points. It's not as though wins are actually taken off you, it's simply the deduction of points, hence why is the case of Salisbury North and Eastern Park this season the win column still shows the amount of games they have actually won and it's just the points column that has been reduced.

I think it is looking like Kenilworth stay and Rosewater go to Div 6.

Down the Hill wrote:

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Do Pooraka get the points for the match?

Come on LK, you are smarter than that. In all sport you only lose points and have them given to the opponent if you have effectively cheated with the players that have taken the field/pitch etc. in a particular game or games such as playing an ineligible player due to not being cleared, assumed name, too many player points, dodgy permits (which some have found out this year), playing whilst under suspension etc. etc.

Breaching a condition of affiliation be it the dreaded AAA, salary cap, drug offence etc. you lose competition points. It's not as though wins are actually taken off you, it's simply the deduction of points, hence why is the case of Salisbury North and Eastern Park this season the win column still shows the amount of games they have actually won and it's just the points column that has been reduced.

Yeah the more I think about it that was dumb and I'll cop that.

Division 6 2018 - Kenilworth vs Trinity, the players fuel bill will be enough to revive the economy.

Bullrider wrote:Division 6 2018 - Kenilworth vs Trinity, the players fuel bill will be enough to revive the economy.

Never know they Trinity might have a trip there this year.

Bullrider wrote:Division 6 2018 - Kenilworth vs Trinity, the players fuel bill will be enough to revive the economy.

Kenilworth have travelled their in the past and will travel wherever they need to play

Zartan wrote:Headbutting seems all the rage this year - 6x separate reports this season for it lol.

5 of them in the last 5 weeks....something in the air?

Inallseriousness wrote:

Zartan wrote:Headbutting seems all the rage this year - 6x separate reports this season for it lol.

5 of them in the last 5 weeks....something in the air?

Plenty of air in the heads of the players delivering the headbutts..

quote="Zartan"]

number2 wrote:Cant be good!

If found guilty, will be graded nothing other than intentional.[/quote]

My point is he has been reported for headbutting so even if he didn't mean it then it will be negligent and get weeks.
Surely cant be found not guilty considering what has been said on this forum in regards to people seeing it happen live![/quote]
I never read it [/quote]

Found guilty and suspended for 7 games

Looks like rosewater have lost 7 points kooks stay up

Should the league consider demoting 3 sides and promoting top 3 from Div 6 considering Kenilworth weren't good enough to stay up off their own accord?

bloods08 wrote:Should the league consider demoting 3 sides and promoting top 3 from Div 6 considering Kenilworth weren't good enough to stay up off their own accord?

Couldnt kenilworth request to drop a grade. Would think they would want to stay up and improve on this season

bloods08 wrote:Should the league consider demoting 3 sides and promoting top 3 from Div 6 considering Kenilworth weren't good enough to stay up off their own accord?

On the same premise the third team wasn't good enough to go up?

Brodlach wrote:On the same premise the third team wasn't good enough to go up?

Make up a bit for last years minor premier ans grand finalist not being allowed to go up due to the new sides..

Meh, obviously haven't learnt from their previous offences, egg on a lot of peoples faces, President is awfully quiet considering he was the leader of the Rosewater rebirth, new club, new values, same dickheads ruining the club, blah blah blah......

SKUNK wrote:Meh, obviously haven't learnt from their previous offences, egg on a lot of peoples faces, President is awfully quiet considering he was the leader of the Rosewater rebirth, new club, new values, same dickheads ruining the club, blah blah blah......

Bit harsh all year they been good and one person has gone and wrecked it. If this was a first offense by the person then the club could not have seen this coming

Robb_Stark wrote:

SKUNK wrote:Meh, obviously haven't learnt from their previous offences, egg on a lot of peoples faces, President is awfully quiet considering he was the leader of the Rosewater rebirth, new club, new values, same dickheads ruining the club, blah blah blah......

Bit harsh all year they been good and one person has gone and wrecked it. If this was a first offense by the person then the club could not have seen this coming

Not his first offence, previous was trivial but when on thin ice you don't skate.

SKUNK wrote:

Robb_Stark wrote:

SKUNK wrote:Meh, obviously haven't learnt from their previous offences, egg on a lot of peoples faces, President is awfully quiet considering he was the leader of the Rosewater rebirth, new club, new values, same dickheads ruining the club, blah blah blah......

Bit harsh all year they been good and one person has gone and wrecked it. If this was a first offense by the person then the club could not have seen this coming

Not his first offence, previous was trivial but when on thin ice you don't skate.

Excuse my ignorance but where can you see tribunal record for a player ?

SKUNK wrote:Meh, obviously haven't learnt from their previous offences, egg on a lot of peoples faces, President is awfully quiet considering he was the leader of the Rosewater rebirth, new club, new values, same dickheads ruining the club, blah blah blah......

Carn, no need to be having a crack like that.. Don't you reckon the President, majority players, supporters, support staff wouldn't be feeling like crap right now?

They've copped their punishment, and this could potentially have a bigger impact on player/sponsor retention/recruitment, let it be - putting the boots in on her isn't adding any value.