by Brock Landers » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:56 am
by A Mum » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:07 am

by cuzzy » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:07 am
Brock Landers wrote:So did anyone train last night or are training tonight? I saw 3 amatuer league clubs doing their stuff at West Beach last night.
If so how strenuous was it/will it be?
P.S. Congrats to Carnas.
by A Mum » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:09 am
cuzzy wrote: 45 in victor today!!
by BJ Ernest » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:52 am
words of wisdom wrote:Come on ladies, how many times does BJ have to tell you Wilunga dont pay players. They just play for the love of the game![]()
On a serious note congrats to my good mates Carnaz & Ness on the healthy arrival of another footballer, little Dion.
by LuvsFooty » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:55 am
by Brock Landers » Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:19 am
BJ Ernest wrote:words of wisdom wrote:Come on ladies, how many times does BJ have to tell you Wilunga dont pay players. They just play for the love of the game![]()
On a serious note congrats to my good mates Carnaz & Ness on the healthy arrival of another footballer, little Dion.
WoW im not saying players dont get paid. Does it make everyone feel good to blindly guess what our players are getting paid?? I think worrying about your own nest would be where i looked first. Im telling you noone gets over $200 a game and as far as i know, noone gets that figure either. In the end, and i say this a fair bit, if clubs want to pay money then good on them, if it improves the standard of the comp and attracts some interest then great.
I will say this tho, recruiting guys that are getting old and wont be at the club in 3-5 years i dont believe to be the way to go. The points system is their to encourage guys to stay around, if the players you recruit are only good for 1-2 years of footy then you will never get the full reward (playing wise) from them.
by words of wisdom » Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:20 am
BJ Ernest wrote:words of wisdom wrote:Come on ladies, how many times does BJ have to tell you Wilunga dont pay players. They just play for the love of the game![]()
On a serious note congrats to my good mates Carnaz & Ness on the healthy arrival of another footballer, little Dion.
WoW im not saying players dont get paid. Does it make everyone feel good to blindly guess what our players are getting paid?? I think worrying about your own nest would be where i looked first. Im telling you noone gets over $200 a game and as far as i know, noone gets that figure either. In the end, and i say this a fair bit, if clubs want to pay money then good on them, if it improves the standard of the comp and attracts some interest then great.
I will say this tho, recruiting guys that are getting old and wont be at the club in 3-5 years i dont believe to be the way to go. The points system is their to encourage guys to stay around, if the players you recruit are only good for 1-2 years of footy then you will never get the full reward (playing wise) from them.
I know 4 a fact, maybe not in 09, that players currently playing 4 willunga have got $200-$250. Im also quite comfortable with players getting $$$ in football & my nest
by Grape Ape » Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:36 am
LuvsFooty wrote:
Excuse my ignorance but who is Gooch and why do we continue to talk about clubs paying out $$$ for players? Every club has done it or is doing it. Its part and parcel of the game and unless your the club treasurer you will probably never know what goes on behind closed doors.
by Toughcall » Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:47 am
by Grape Ape » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:13 am
Toughcall wrote:All clubs ideally would want the recruits to play as long as possible, but with the points the club's will concentate on holding thier juniors (0 points), which is challenging enough. Not all clubs in the association live 30 minutes from Adelaide.
by Toughcall » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:28 am
by words of wisdom » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:33 am
Grape Ape wrote:Toughcall wrote:All clubs ideally would want the recruits to play as long as possible, but with the points the club's will concentate on holding thier juniors (0 points), which is challenging enough. Not all clubs in the association live 30 minutes from Adelaide.
Which is why the points system is advantages clubs with a stronger population base. I find it strange that clubs like Myponga & Yank supported it.
by cuzzy » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:39 am
words of wisdom wrote:Grape Ape wrote:Toughcall wrote:All clubs ideally would want the recruits to play as long as possible, but with the points the club's will concentate on holding thier juniors (0 points), which is challenging enough. Not all clubs in the association live 30 minutes from Adelaide.
Which is why the points system is advantages clubs with a stronger population base. I find it strange that clubs like Myponga & Yank supported it.
Agree GA. Its funny that people outside of those clubs can see it....
Is there a proposal going around the GSFL at the moment to change the point system? More points to the lower ranked clubs?
by LuvsFooty » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:57 am
by ball breaker » Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:05 pm
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
by ball breaker » Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:09 pm
LuvsFooty wrote:At times I dont agree with some of the finer points of the system, but it does certainly make your recruiting department a lot more stratgegic. In the GSFL the dominance of Willunga has probably offset the effectiveness of the system but it was never intended to be an overnight fix. Even in the first year of the system I think the comp was a lot more even than the previuos year. I think you will hear of a few clubs going to the tribunal with matters in the coming months, with some issues. For example we have a player who has played 12 games in 2 years (2 more than the required 10 to be a zero point player) We also have a player who plays with another club that played with us for 2 years but only managed 19 senior games (6 short of the required 25 to be a zero point player). For the lower clubs these are the small descrepencies that are costing us.
by Toughcall » Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:27 pm
by LuvsFooty » Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:54 pm
ball breaker wrote:LuvsFooty wrote:At times I dont agree with some of the finer points of the system, but it does certainly make your recruiting department a lot more stratgegic. In the GSFL the dominance of Willunga has probably offset the effectiveness of the system but it was never intended to be an overnight fix. Even in the first year of the system I think the comp was a lot more even than the previuos year. I think you will hear of a few clubs going to the tribunal with matters in the coming months, with some issues. For example we have a player who has played 12 games in 2 years (2 more than the required 10 to be a zero point player) We also have a player who plays with another club that played with us for 2 years but only managed 19 senior games (6 short of the required 25 to be a zero point player). For the lower clubs these are the small descrepencies that are costing us.
Luvsfooty... the points system does make things difficult mate. But i guess with everything the rules are black and white although life is 'grey'... it's the only way the system will work if the rule makers follow the wordings. If they set a precedent by allowing some players/clubs to challenge some minor points (ie those mentioned above) i believe it will make a mockery of the system. Whilst this is 'new' we should let it run and after each season discuss the positives and negatives of it and implement any changes for the greater good of our great competition!
by emerson » Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:59 pm
Football
Other Footy Leagues
Country Footy
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |

