SA Footy

Trader wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:

whufc wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:Go to:

https://mvic.sos.state.mi.us/Voter/Index

Insert this

JB.png

Go to top right

JB2.png

HOW ABOUT THEM APPLES!

Do you actually think only one party would look to take advantage of it though and the other would just sit back being the honest joe of the US.

Not the point. We don't actually know whether James voted red or blue. The point is there is definitely voter fraud.

While I agree that is fairly clear evidence of fraud, I wouldn't put it past the republicans to have done this themselves* to further create doubt over the mail-in ballots.

*I'm not saying as well, I'm saying this very example was done by them!!!

For what its worth, out of 150,000,000 votes I'd be shocked if there isn't 10,000 examples of things done poorly, incorrectly, etc.

whufc wrote:If its American doesn't that mean that the Application was received on 12 June 2020 and then sent the vote on 25 September and the vote was received on the 2 November 2020. What day was the vote.....am I missing the issue.

Trader wrote:

whufc wrote:If its American doesn't that mean that the Application was received on 12 June 2020 and then sent the vote on 25 September and the vote was received on the 2 November 2020. What day was the vote.....am I missing the issue.

James Bradley is one of those on the list of people with the 1900 year of birth.
The issue isn't the dates he applied and got sent a ballot etc, the issue is that he is apparently older than the oldest person in america.

Gozu wrote:I hope Trump ends up in the slammer for this. He's literally trying to destroy democracy. We all knew he was going to do this if he lost he would throw a tantrum and tie it all up in the courts. But wow, he's had two opportunities now to do proper respectful concession speeches and he's soiled himself both times.

At the end of the day the USA deserves this for electing a clown like Trump in the first place he was already a pig of a man before that he was obviously going to shit on the presidency when he got in and then on the country itself on the way out.

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Trader wrote:While I agree that is fairly clear evidence of fraud, I wouldn't put it past the republicans to have done this themselves* to further create doubt over the mail-in ballots.

*I'm not saying as well, I'm saying this very example was done by them!!!

For what its worth, out of 150,000,000 votes I'd be shocked if there isn't 10,000 examples of things done poorly, incorrectly, etc.

Where did you get 10,000 from? Where's the evidence?

How many dead people have lived in the USA in the past 232 years? There's your potential maximum limit of the fraud

And, again, I'm not saying one side is guilty / innocent.

Trader wrote:

whufc wrote:If its American doesn't that mean that the Application was received on 12 June 2020 and then sent the vote on 25 September and the vote was received on the 2 November 2020. What day was the vote.....am I missing the issue.

James Bradley is one of those on the list of people with the 1900 year of birth.
The issue isn't the dates he applied and got sent a ballot etc, the issue is that he is apparently older than the oldest person in america.

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Trader wrote:

whufc wrote:If its American doesn't that mean that the Application was received on 12 June 2020 and then sent the vote on 25 September and the vote was received on the 2 November 2020. What day was the vote.....am I missing the issue.

James Bradley is one of those on the list of people with the 1900 year of birth.
The issue isn't the dates he applied and got sent a ballot etc, the issue is that he is apparently older than the oldest person in america.

This was him 6 years ago.

He says moonshine, baccy & pussy every day is what's keeping him young

James Bradley.jpg

Trader wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:

Trader wrote:While I agree that is fairly clear evidence of fraud, I wouldn't put it past the republicans to have done this themselves* to further create doubt over the mail-in ballots.

*I'm not saying as well, I'm saying this very example was done by them!!!

For what its worth, out of 150,000,000 votes I'd be shocked if there isn't 10,000 examples of things done poorly, incorrectly, etc.

Where did you get 10,000 from? Where's the evidence?

How many dead people have lived in the USA in the past 232 years? There's your potential maximum limit of the fraud

And, again, I'm not saying one side is guilty / innocent.

There is no evidence for 10,000, its an opinion not a fact.
To expect every single one of 150 million votes to be perfect is an unrealistic expectation.

For example, James Bradley might be born in 1990, and when he typed it in it was a typo and the 9 and zero are next to each other, and it came out 1900.

Sure it looks dodgy, but to find 7 examples of typos in 150,000,000 for mine doesn't mean there is wide spread cheating going on.

#context

Q. wrote:Trump's speech is a shameless attempt to seize power via falsifications that nurture violence. It is a fascist attack on democracy and the election system.

Jimmy_041 wrote:

bulldogproud wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:Can't argue with Trump there, why oh why don't they want observers observing?

They did have observers there, in every count.
Cheers

They were made to stand back so they couldn't actually observe

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/pennsyl ... d=74040279

bulldogproud wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:

bulldogproud wrote:

Armchair expert wrote:Can't argue with Trump there, why oh why don't they want observers observing?

They did have observers there, in every count.
Cheers

They were made to stand back so they couldn't actually observe

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/pennsyl ... d=74040279

They were made to stand back a Covid-safe distance initially. That is nothing fraudulent.
Cheers

Booney wrote:I’m told that President Trump can’t get his messaging straight on counting the votes because he doesn’t understand what “stop the count” means. On a call this morning, an adviser had to explain to him that if they stopped counting votes right now, he would lose the election.

Q. wrote:

Q. wrote:Trump's speech is a shameless attempt to seize power via falsifications that nurture violence. It is a fascist attack on democracy and the election system.

Good to see that sections of the media cut off his lies and dangerous rhetoric. You could be forgiven for thinking we were watching a tinpot African dictator.