by Leaping Lindner » Sun Jan 22, 2012 2:42 am
by Sojourner » Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:27 pm
by dedja » Sun Jan 22, 2012 4:59 pm
by southee » Sun Jan 22, 2012 5:32 pm
Leaping Lindner wrote:Crusader Abbott is on a mission.....
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/i ... 6249986992
As Abbott is supposedly a Christian (Catholics are Christian right?) where does this fit into the whole Love thy neighbour and Do unto others thing?
by Gozu » Sun Jan 22, 2012 5:45 pm
by story of my life » Mon Jan 23, 2012 10:48 am
southee wrote:Leaping Lindner wrote:Crusader Abbott is on a mission.....
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/i ... 6249986992
As Abbott is supposedly a Christian (Catholics are Christian right?) where does this fit into the whole Love thy neighbour and Do unto others thing?
About as much a gillard being a unionist and open and honest to the people of Australia ....
Oh hang on a minute
by Sky Pilot » Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:49 pm
story of my life wrote:southee wrote:Leaping Lindner wrote:Crusader Abbott is on a mission.....
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/i ... 6249986992
As Abbott is supposedly a Christian (Catholics are Christian right?) where does this fit into the whole Love thy neighbour and Do unto others thing?
About as much a gillard being a unionist and open and honest to the people of Australia ....
Oh hang on a minute
gillard was a lawyer
by Leaping Lindner » Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:43 am
Sky Pilot wrote:story of my life wrote:southee wrote:Leaping Lindner wrote:Crusader Abbott is on a mission.....
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/i ... 6249986992
As Abbott is supposedly a Christian (Catholics are Christian right?) where does this fit into the whole Love thy neighbour and Do unto others thing?
About as much a gillard being a unionist and open and honest to the people of Australia ....
Oh hang on a minute
gillard was a lawyer
Speaks volumes for her lack of credibility
by dedja » Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:55 pm
by GWW » Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:04 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:51 pm
GWW wrote:Heard someone senior from the Defence Force say the other day they would probably ignore this direction as they wouldn't be prepared to breach International Law.
by DOC » Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:54 pm
GWW wrote:Heard someone senior from the Defence Force say the other day they would probably ignore this direction as they wouldn't be prepared to breach International Law.
by dedja » Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:56 pm
by DOC » Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:58 pm
dedja wrote:Probably dumping leaky boats full of people in someone else's territorial waters ... Just saying
by dedja » Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:59 pm
by GWW » Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:08 pm
DOC wrote:GWW wrote:Heard someone senior from the Defence Force say the other day they would probably ignore this direction as they wouldn't be prepared to breach International Law.
What law would that be?
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:15 pm
by GWW » Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:26 pm
by stan » Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:59 am
DOC wrote:GWW wrote:Heard someone senior from the Defence Force say the other day they would probably ignore this direction as they wouldn't be prepared to breach International Law.
What law would that be?
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:07 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |