by smithy » Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:04 am
by Jabber » Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:02 am
smithy wrote:If as expected Cove leave the comp, what do you lot think the future is ?
Will we soldier on with limited teams or will clubs go their seperate ways ?
Last season a pact was made to stick together and try and build the comp.
Clearly, one of these clubs reneged on this and clubs are wondering what the future holds.
To be honest, there are still several unanswered questions.
How did the club come to the conclusion that it wanted to leave the SCA ?
Was it AGM, presso night, drunken bbq ?
If it was at an AGM, why wasn't it communicated to the SCA committee ?
If it wasn't at an AGM, then the constitution of the club mustn't exist.
Why does the club feel it needs to leave ?
Why wasn't a COve representative at the last SCA meeting ? to discuss this very matter
by smithy » Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:04 am
by smithy » Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:07 am
Jabber wrote:If just a simple "pact" has occured, and no detail on how to fix the problem, or any clear sign that sticking together is going to fix the problem, then can you really blame a club from finding more stable ground to build on?
by shoe boy » Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:31 am
by top gun » Fri Jun 11, 2010 11:45 am
smithy wrote:Jabber wrote:If just a simple "pact" has occured, and no detail on how to fix the problem, or any clear sign that sticking together is going to fix the problem, then can you really blame a club from finding more stable ground to build on?
Do you have any idea why 3 clubs left the association in the 1st place ?
Leaving a ship you put holes in would be more like it.
by Jabber » Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:02 pm
smithy wrote:All clubs agreed to stick together and work on getting trying to entice new clubs to the competition.
In recent times ICC and Hamilton have joined lower grades and it's hoped Flaggies will come up to A GRade.
If Cove want to leave, that's their perogative, just let the association know!
by Jabber » Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:03 pm
smithy wrote:All clubs agreed to stick together and work on getting trying to entice new clubs to the competition.
In recent times ICC and Hamilton have joined lower grades and it's hoped Flaggies will come up to A GRade.
If Cove want to leave, that's their perogative, just let the association know!
by Jabber » Fri Jun 11, 2010 12:04 pm
shoe boy wrote:The possible exit of Cove has galvinised the SCA in a way I have not seen in the past and to see past players and administrators get on board with a vision and strategic planning over the next 10 years the future of cricket in the south will have an exciting future in the next ten and many more after that.
by smithy » Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:43 pm
Jabber wrote:smithy wrote:All clubs agreed to stick together and work on getting trying to entice new clubs to the competition.
In recent times ICC and Hamilton have joined lower grades and it's hoped Flaggies will come up to A GRade.
If Cove want to leave, that's their perogative, just let the association know!
Yes, work on it how, thats my question, how were they to work on it?
by smithy » Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:48 pm
top gun wrote:smithy wrote:Jabber wrote:If just a simple "pact" has occured, and no detail on how to fix the problem, or any clear sign that sticking together is going to fix the problem, then can you really blame a club from finding more stable ground to build on?
Do you have any idea why 3 clubs left the association in the 1st place ?
Leaving a ship you put holes in would be more like it.
Tell me smithy why have 3 clubs left?
by top gun » Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:08 pm
smithy wrote:top gun wrote:smithy wrote:Jabber wrote:If just a simple "pact" has occured, and no detail on how to fix the problem, or any clear sign that sticking together is going to fix the problem, then can you really blame a club from finding more stable ground to build on?
Do you have any idea why 3 clubs left the association in the 1st place ?
Leaving a ship you put holes in would be more like it.
Tell me smithy why have 3 clubs left?
3 clubs left because of various decisions and attitudes made by some Cove players and officials in the early 90's.
This is fact and has come from committee members from those teams at the time.
That doesn't mean I think it's right or agree with the decision, just what I've been told.
by smithy » Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:13 pm
by Jabber » Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:28 pm
by shoe boy » Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:35 pm
by Jabber » Fri Jun 11, 2010 3:53 pm
shoe boy wrote:Jaber by any chance do you have one of them covers over your bonnet and grill!
by Offcutter » Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:33 pm
smithy wrote:I ain't going to make something like that up Topgun.
I'll give you an example - 1989 one day final a fight breaks out between a cove player and an Aldinga player,who I will not name, both as much in the wrong as each other.
Cove player gets suspended sentence, Aldinga player gets LIFE ban later reduced to 7 or 10 years I think.
A Cove committee member was president of the association at the time.
I saw the incident and I can comment on the fact that both players were as bad as each other on the day.
by smithy » Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:39 pm
Offcutter wrote:smithy wrote:I ain't going to make something like that up Topgun.
I'll give you an example - 1989 one day final a fight breaks out between a cove player and an Aldinga player,who I will not name, both as much in the wrong as each other.
Cove player gets suspended sentence, Aldinga player gets LIFE ban later reduced to 7 or 10 years I think.
A Cove committee member was president of the association at the time.
I saw the incident and I can comment on the fact that both players were as bad as each other on the day.
Yep, I was there on that day as well Smithy.. was a very "GRIM" day.....
by interested observer » Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:41 pm
Offcutter wrote:smithy wrote:I ain't going to make something like that up Topgun.
I'll give you an example - 1989 one day final a fight breaks out between a cove player and an Aldinga player,who I will not name, both as much in the wrong as each other.
Cove player gets suspended sentence, Aldinga player gets LIFE ban later reduced to 7 or 10 years I think.
A Cove committee member was president of the association at the time.
I saw the incident and I can comment on the fact that both players were as bad as each other on the day.
Yep, I was there on that day as well Smithy.. was a very "GRIM" day.....
by smithy » Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:43 pm
Jabber wrote:Its all Cove's fault.
Its so clear now.
The rest of the comp should shout with glee now that the nasty and evil Cove club get banished down the hill.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |