Dogwatcher wrote:I understand the Liberals will today vote to support the parliamentary review into the current SACA situation.
There's no margin in not supporting the review, which is seen by many as a vote-getting exercise for Labor's Paul Caica, who is pushing for investigation.
There's a perception that SACA has followed all the correct protocols and have enough evidence to support their decision-making processes.
If you read SACA's five page rebuttal to Parliament, you would realize that last statement of yours is totally false - more holes in it than swiss cheese!! They are extremely worried by this enquiry, as it will show up all their lies and deceptions.
Also, this has nothing to do with Paul Caica wanting a promotion or being a vote getting exercise, he just wants SACA to be held accountable seeing the government give them so much money!
Notice SACA continue to be underhanded, just appointed two people to the SACA Board with no cricket experience, more "yes" men/women for them to get thru all of Bradshaw/Sinclair's wishes, what a joke. They knew one more person quit Board over their handlings of this disaster and they had no quorum to make this decision.