SA Footy

OKC! wrote:Why not give him a go. Only playing the Churches.

Playing A&SCA so shut up

p.s. Churches pumped Ingle Farm in a trial game last week - Sandercock wicketless

Well slightly harder match up you would have thought.

ATCA association side is just a little better than Ingle Farm,

OKC! wrote:

Sonofbrowny25 wrote:

Computer Crashed wrote:

Tony Clifton wrote:Payneham all out for 30

That's massive compared to ROCS second innings yest.
25 I think.

Sandercock 6/15 including a hatrick...

Why not give him a go. Only playing the Churches.

That's what Pooraka said about Atco in last years t20 Como lol

OKC! wrote:ATCA association side is just a little better than Ingle Farm,

Not if you ask some of the Farmers

Anyone got scores from the ATCA v ASCA game yesterday?

whufc wrote:
That's what Pooraka said about Atco in last years t20 Como lol

Yeah we played 4 or 5 young guys and didnt give them enough respect.

Having said that, they were rubbish, we lost that game, it wasnt like they had a batter that took us apart or a great bowling spell, we were just horrible.

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:Anyone got scores from the ATCA v ASCA game yesterday?

Washed out, postponed to a later date - Cover pitch was apparently under water

OKC! wrote:

whufc wrote:
That's what Pooraka said about Atco in last years t20 Como lol

Yeah we played 4 or 5 young guys and didnt give them enough respect.

Having said that, they were rubbish, we lost that game, it wasnt like they had a batter that took us apart or a great bowling spell, we were just horrible.

OKC! wrote:Yeah we played 4 or 5 young guys and didnt give them enough respect.

OKC! wrote:Having said that, they were rubbish, we lost that game

Sounds like you are still not giving them enough respesct..

Zartan wrote:

OKC! wrote:Yeah we played 4 or 5 young guys and didnt give them enough respect.

OKC! wrote:Having said that, they were rubbish, we lost that game

Sounds like you are still not giving them enough respesct..

Not at all.

We didn't give them the respect by putting out the team we did on the day. We expected to win and that was our problem.
If we played them again we would not do that again.

We may not rock up literally vomitting in the bushes from an all nighter at the skippers house while use were warming up!!

whufc wrote:We may not rock up literally vomitting in the bushes from an all nighter at the skippers house while use were warming up!!

What?

OKC! wrote:

whufc wrote:We may not rock up literally vomitting in the bushes from an all nighter at the skippers house while use were warming up!!

What?

No doubt at full strength in a proper game you would have flogged us but we didn't take the game overly serious either, five of us had been at the captains house the night before and still hadn't been to bed when we rocked up

I had to vomitt before the start and during the innings change due to my lack of ability to handle my drink

OKC! wrote:

whufc wrote:
That's what Pooraka said about Atco in last years t20 Como lol

Yeah we played 4 or 5 young guys and didnt give them enough respect.

Having said that, they were rubbish, we lost that game, it wasnt like they had a batter that took us apart or a great bowling spell, we were just horrible.

Very gracious!

Tony Clifton wrote:

OKC! wrote:

whufc wrote:
That's what Pooraka said about Atco in last years t20 Como lol

Yeah we played 4 or 5 young guys and didnt give them enough respect.

Having said that, they were rubbish, we lost that game, it wasnt like they had a batter that took us apart or a great bowling spell, we were just horrible.

Very gracious!

I think the score was like 80 odd chased down. Niether team was any good.

and WHFC, I know, same story with a couple of those young guys, bus straight from HQ I think!

Zartan wrote:

OKC! wrote:Why not give him a go. Only playing the Churches.

Playing A&SCA so shut up

p.s. Churches pumped Ingle Farm in a trial game last week - Sandercock wicketless

I would be very surprised if Ingle Farm were anywhere near full strength, both opening bowlers did not play, but C grade opening bowler did. Easy for Sandercock to go wicketless when he didnt play, if your referring to Lachlan!

Lloyd Bridges wrote:

Zartan wrote:

OKC! wrote:Why not give him a go. Only playing the Churches.

Playing A&SCA so shut up

p.s. Churches pumped Ingle Farm in a trial game last week - Sandercock wicketless

I would be very surprised if Ingle Farm were anywhere near full strength, both opening bowlers did not play, but C grade opening bowler did. Easy for Sandercock to go wicketless when he didnt play, if your referring to Lachlan!

Yeah that's right, Sandercock didn't play lol

But from the team that played ROCS last round, 8/11 did play, including Sandery

Zartan wrote:

Lloyd Bridges wrote:

Zartan wrote:

OKC! wrote:Why not give him a go. Only playing the Churches.

Playing A&SCA so shut up

p.s. Churches pumped Ingle Farm in a trial game last week - Sandercock wicketless

I would be very surprised if Ingle Farm were anywhere near full strength, both opening bowlers did not play, but C grade opening bowler did. Easy for Sandercock to go wicketless when he didnt play, if your referring to Lachlan!

Yeah that's right, Sandercock didn't play lol

But from the team that played ROCS last round, 8/11 did play, including Sandery

Don't worry, we have all of those Church boys' names and phone numbers ....big recruiting drive for next season.

2 ties in LO5 yesterday. Would suggest that has never happened and will never happen again

Pooraka v Grange is a strange result on day 1.

Pooraka 7/55 in 42 overs after bowling Grange out for 115? WTF.