SA Footy

today the bays were $1.02 and sturt $1.03, pity the poor fools who took the odds on the tiges, but surely to have teams at 50/1 on and 33/1 on is unacceptable from a betting agency, why dont they just say they wont take bets on those sides? bullshite as far as i am concerned

what were south paying? i know west were $16

Tassie Blues wrote:what were south paying? i know west were $16

south were 11.00

stampy wrote:today the bays were $1.02 and sturt $1.03, pity the poor fools who took the odds on the tiges, but surely to have teams at 50/1 on and 33/1 on is unacceptable from a betting agency, why dont they just say they wont take bets on those sides? bullshite as far as i am concerned

Why wouldn't they? I'd have a little nibble at a team paying 33/1. A lot of people probably would. So that's how they make their money.

stampy wrote:today the bays were $1.02 and sturt $1.03, pity the poor fools who took the odds on the tiges, but surely to have teams at 50/1 on and 33/1 on is unacceptable from a betting agency, why dont they just say they wont take bets on those sides? bullshite as far as i am concerned

why is that bullshite

as a punter you choose whether or not to put your money on

they dont hold a gun to your head saying you HAVE to take the $1.02/$1.03

bayman wrote:

Tassie Blues wrote:what were south paying? i know west were $16

south were 11.00

did u have a few $$ on it bayman?