SA Footy

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:09 pm**

What he has been charged for and the injuries sustained to the chap that he is alledged to have assualted could suggest that Richmond might be down a player for this year.

Richmond can elevate a rookie to replace an injured player, yet I am tipping that they cannot do the same to replace a player that is serving jail time?

http://snipurl.com/17rqn

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:20 pm**

With a name like Krakouer, they're no strangers for doing stir!
Just coz he's a footy player doesn't make him exempt from the law!
This is Australia not America (re. O.J. Simpson)
Still, under bizarre & rare circumstances such as this... I think the Tigers should be
allowed to let another player step up in his place!

Posted: **Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:56 pm**

Well if hes found guilty I reckon Richmond might as well get rid of him.

Posted: **Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:32 am**

No, Richmond are down two players...they signed Kingsley :lol:

After all, how 'hungry' can a millionare really get?

regards,

REB

Posted: **Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:43 am**

Rik E Boy wrote:No, Richmond are down two players...they signed Kingsley After all, how 'hungry' can a millionare really get?

regards,

REB

Kingo,a smart man,has figured if he wants to play finals football......... he he.

Posted: **Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:29 pm**

I hope he plays for Richmond this year- another reason they wont do much in 2007 :roll:

Posted: **Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:35 pm**

MatteeG wrote:I hope he plays for Richmond this year- another reason they wont do much in 2007

Bloody L Matteeeeeeeeee I'm not going to stand for that bollocks!!

...oh, that's right, he doesn't play for us anymore. :wink:

regards,

REB

SA Footy

Will Andrew Krakouer play for Richmond?

Will Andrew Krakouer play for Richmond?